Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add some documentation to the Travis script. #701

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2015

Conversation

mikejcurry
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is to add some documentation to the Travis build script based on the discussion in #699.

I’ve just put some information in the script and I haven’t gone into a huge amount of detail. The main thing I wanted to capture was the rationale for building the JVM twice rather than once - which makes perfect sense once you understand the coverage tool; but confused me at first.

Happy to restructure or move elsewhere if that is preferred.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 84.42%

Merging #701 into master will not affect coverage as of c11d54f

@@            master    #701   diff @@
======================================
  Files          162     162       
  Stmts         2228    2228       
  Branches        74      74       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
  Hit           1881    1881       
  Partial          0       0       
  Missed         347     347       

Review entire Coverage Diff as of c11d54f

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

ceedubs commented Nov 26, 2015

Wow great. Thanks! 👍

@non
Copy link
Contributor

non commented Nov 26, 2015

👍 This is great, thanks so much!

non added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2015
Add some documentation to the Travis script.
@non non merged commit 09bfac7 into typelevel:master Nov 26, 2015
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 26, 2015

Bit late but nice :)

@mikejcurry mikejcurry deleted the add-docs-to-travis-build branch December 11, 2015 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants