Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Test Monad map/flatMap coherence law #736

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2015
Merged

Test Monad map/flatMap coherence law #736

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2015

Conversation

ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

@ceedubs ceedubs commented Dec 10, 2015

This is basically the same story as #728, but it was introduced in
fa6457a.

@ceedubs
Test Monad map/flatMap coherence law
8788d9d 
This is basically the same story as typelevel#728, but it was introduced in
fa6457a.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 85.86%

Merging #736 into master will increase coverage by +0.05% as of a0cb9e2

@@            master    #736   diff @@
======================================
  Files          162     162       
  Stmts         2249    2250     +1
  Branches        74      74       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
+ Hit           1930    1932     +2
  Partial          0       0       
+ Missed         319     318     -1

Review entire Coverage Diff as of a0cb9e2

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@stew
Copy link
Contributor

stew commented Dec 10, 2015

👍

fthomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2015
@fthomas
Merge pull request #736 from ceedubs/monad-map-flatmap-coherence
4f0cd09 
Test Monad map/flatMap coherence law
@fthomas fthomas merged commit 4f0cd09 into typelevel:master Dec 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@ceedubs @codecov-io @stew @fthomas