Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update sbt-typelevel to 0.6.0 #492

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2023
Merged

Conversation

typelevel-steward[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

About this PR

πŸ“¦ Updates org.typelevel:sbt-typelevel from 0.5.4 to 0.6.0

πŸ“œ GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

Usage

βœ… Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

βš™ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.typelevel", artifactId = "sbt-typelevel" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.typelevel", artifactId = "sbt-typelevel" }
}]
labels: sbt-plugin-update, early-semver-major, semver-spec-minor, version-scheme:early-semver, commit-count:1

@milessabin milessabin self-requested a review October 18, 2023 09:48
@milessabin milessabin self-assigned this Oct 18, 2023
Copy link
Member

@milessabin milessabin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@milessabin milessabin merged commit c26077a into main Oct 18, 2023
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant