Add Wandalen/wretry.action@v3 with subactions

[Vampire]

Upstream PR: Wandalen/wretry.action#167

[Vampire]

Upstream was merged too. :-)
Do we need to do something here, for example to not handle updates?

[krzema12]

We need the action to get a new release (under a major version tag/branch as well) with the typings, then we just remove the typings from the catalog and that's all!

[Vampire]

But that's a breaking change.
If we have typings for v1 and the action adds typings for v2, then if we remove the typing from the catalog all v1 usage is broken.

Or if someone uses v1.0.1 with the v1 typings from the catalog and the action adds the typings in v1.0.2, then the 1.0.1 usage will also be broken when removing from the catalog.

[krzema12]

If Wandalen adds a new major version (v2), then you're right, we should keep the typings as we're the only source of typings for your exemplary v1. But if they just update the existing major version tag/branch with the typings, I think we're safe.

[Vampire]

But if they just update the existing major version tag/branch with the typings, I think we're safe.

As I said, not if anyone uses a version more concrete than just major:

?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.2
  ... from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools/v1.2/action.yml
  ... types from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools/v1.2/action-types.yml
  ... types from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools/v1.2/action-types.yaml
  ... types from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/typesafegithub/github-actions-typing-catalog/main/typings/tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools/v1/action-types.yml
?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.2
?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.2
?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.2
?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.2
?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.2

?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.3
  ... from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools/v1.3/action.yml
  ... types from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools/v1.3/action-types.yml
?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.3
?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.3
?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.3
?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.3
?? Requesting tecolicom/actions-use-homebrew-tools@v1.3

When you request 1.3, it uses the upstream typings.
When you request 1.2, it uses the catalog v1 typings.

[krzema12]

Ok, I see it now. The typings has been in the catalog for 10 hours, I think in this particular case we can assume it's fairly ok to remove, although technically being a breaking change. We could do that if the action owner released the action. The longer the wait is, the more risky it is to remove the typings from the catalog. I'm wondering if we should maybe remove them now to decrease a chance of someone starting relying on them, and ask the action owner to release. The typings are already in the action, so from my perspective the release will happen within several days. WDYT?

[Vampire]

I mainly meant in general.
In this case I'm probably the only one using the 5 recent typings so far, yeah, and I have it not productive yet.