Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

go.uber.org/atomic => sync/atomic #60

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2023
Merged

Conversation

abhinav
Copy link
Collaborator

@abhinav abhinav commented Oct 28, 2023

Replace uses of go.uber.org/atomic
with the standard library's sync/atomic.

On top of that, upgrade to the latest release of multierr
to pull in uber-go/multierr#72 which made a similar change there.

With these two changes combined,
drop the dependency on go.uber.org/atomic completely.

(Won't pass lint until #59 merges.)

Replace uses of go.uber.org/atomic
with the standard library's sync/atomic.

On top of that, upgrade to the latest release of multierr
to pull in uber-go/multierr#72 which made a similar change there.

With these two changes combined,
drop the dependency on go.uber.org/atomic completely.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #60 (a7f12ff) into main (60f5c0f) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #60   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.20%   87.20%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        2603     2603           
=======================================
  Hits         2270     2270           
  Misses        269      269           
  Partials       64       64           
Files Coverage Δ
scheduler.go 88.88% <ø> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@sywhang sywhang merged commit a5c72ac into uber-go:main Oct 28, 2023
6 checks passed
@abhinav abhinav deleted the no-atomic branch October 29, 2023 01:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants