Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Perform fast memcmp comparison before making deep pixel-by-pixel comparison #142

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

constantine-fry
Copy link

@constantine-fry constantine-fry commented Feb 25, 2021

This diff changes the logic of fb_compareWithImage to make deep comparison only if memcmp function returns false and there is tolerance for pixel mismatch.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Feb 25, 2021

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


Constantine Fry seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@constantine-fry constantine-fry changed the title Perform fast comparison first. Perform fast memcmp comparison before making deep pixel-by-pixel comparison Feb 25, 2021
@alanzeino
Copy link
Collaborator

Just a heads up, I'm testing this at the moment to see how much faster it is; we have 20k snapshot tests so we should have some decent numbers soon. Thanks!

Copy link

@user24-cmyk user24-cmyk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants