Adapt to Coq PR #19301 which unifies the syntax of Theorem, Definition and Fixpoint #21
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…n and Fixpoint.
In particular, I guess that it is not anymore necessary to retrograde
a non-recursive fixpoint to a definition. If there is no "{struct ...}"
in a unary declaration, this will be automatically the case.
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The change is rather straightforward.
In particular, I guess that it is not anymore necessary to retrograde a non-recursive fixpoint to a definition. If there is no
{struct ...}in a unary declaration, this will be automatically the case.To be merged synchronously with coq/coq#19301 when the latter is ready.