Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug fix for rain evaporation due to inconsistent application of air density on a few lines #68

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gthompsnWRF
Copy link
Collaborator

Calculations of rain evaporation rate (variable called prv_rev) had some mismatching of units due to air density inconsistencies. The set of 3 lines will fix it causing prv_rev to be kg kg-1 s-1 as it should be ahead of adding it to the principle tendency terms.

This was discovered with the help of Ruiyu Sun and Eric Aligo (NCEP-EMC) due to discovering a few grid points with larger than 100% RH (with respect to water) due to the improper rate limiter.

@gthompsnWRF
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I have no idea why prebuild-SCM is failing.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ericaligo-NOAA ericaligo-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

I have no idea why prebuild-SCM is failing.

It's failing because the SCM is only caught up to NCAR:main, which is behind ufs/dev by a couple of commits. This check is more of a "heads up" to code managers that this PR (or previous ones, in this case) require changes to the SCM's variable declaration/allocation. This is expected and nothing to worry about.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

@Qingfu-Liu @gthompsnWRF I'll be responsible for creating super-repository PRs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@dustinswales dustinswales left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@gthompsnWRF
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this PR because it is now combined with #69

@gthompsnWRF gthompsnWRF closed this May 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants