Update documentation for new NSSL-MP namelist parameters

[MicroTed]

Add documentation lines for new namelist parameters (nssl_alphar, nssl_ehw0, nssl_ehlw0) with a minor name tweak.
Also, nssl_params(14) is used by another version, so this is changed to nssl_params(15) for consistency (no effect)

Follow-up on #45 (@JiliDong-NOAA)

• Also update the CODEOWNERS file to reflect the latest physics POCs in https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14y0Th_sSpCqlssEMNfSZ_Ni9wrpPqfpPY0kRG7jCZB8/edit?usp=sharing

[MicroTed]

Question: Does SCM need to be updated now, too, or is that a bridge to cross later?

OK, done here: NCAR/ccpp-scm#385

[grantfirl]

Question: Does SCM need to be updated now, too, or is that a bridge to cross later?

OK, done here: NCAR/ccpp-scm#385

Typically, CCPP code managers handle any changes in FV3 that need to be brought over to the SCM, but thanks for going the extra mile.

[grantfirl]

@MicroTed I'd like to ask you if you'd be willing to bring in the changes from #76 to this PR to reduce code management workload. That PR changes baselines, but it is only a build system change for the UGWP scheme. I would be responsible for testing the combined PR to make sure it is behaving as expected.

[MicroTed]

I'd like to ask you if you'd be willing to bring in the changes from #76 to this PR to reduce code

@grantfirl Sure, that shouldn't be much trouble.

Done.

[grantfirl]

@MicroTed Please update this branch to the latest ufs/dev branch when you get a chance.

[MicroTed]

@MicroTed Please update this branch to the latest ufs/dev branch when you get a chance.

@grantfirl I am getting a conflict in ccpp/physics/CMakeLists.txt. The second half is from #76, and I think that was taken back out of this PR? So should whole thing be removed or no?

Never mind -- I forgot to pull my branch, haha

[grantfirl]

@MicroTed Please update this branch to the latest ufs/dev branch when you get a chance.

@grantfirl I am getting a conflict in ccpp/physics/CMakeLists.txt. The second half is from #76, and I think that was taken back out of this PR? So should whole thing be removed or no?

<<<<<<< HEAD
# Reduce optimization for mo_gas_optics_kernels.F90 (to avoid an apparent compiler bug with Intel 19+)
if(${LOCAL_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/physics/rte-rrtmgp/rrtmgp/kernels/mo_gas_optics_kernels.F90 IN_LIST SCHEMES_OPENMP_OFF AND
   CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL "Release" AND ${CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER_ID} STREQUAL "Intel")
  SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES(${LOCAL_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/physics/rte-rrtmgp/rrtmgp/kernels/mo_gas_optics_kernels.F90
                              APPEND_STRING PROPERTY COMPILE_FLAGS " ${CMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_PHYSICS} -O1")
endif()

# Increase optimization for ugwp_driver_v0.F
if(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL "Release" AND ${CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER_ID} STREQUAL "Intel")
  SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES(${LOCAL_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/physics/ugwp_driver_v0.F
                              APPEND_STRING PROPERTY COMPILE_FLAGS " ${CMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_PHYSICS} -fp-model=fast -fprotect-parens -fimf-precision=high")
endif()

=======
>>>>>>> ufs/ufs/dev

Ya, all CMakeLists.txt changes should be removed. So, you can delete everything between the <<<<<< and >>>>>>, then git add the file and git commit. This should fix the conflict.

[zach1221]

Testing on UFS-WM PR #1775 is complete. Feel free to go ahead and merge this sub-pr. @grantfirl

[jkbk2004]

@Qingfu-Liu @dustinswales If you have permission, please, go ahead to merge this pr.