Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[develop] Update ufs-weather-model hash and add WoFS_v0 to suites and tests #492

Merged

Conversation

MichaelLueken
Copy link
Collaborator

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES:

The ufs-weather-model hash was updated in the release/public-v2.1.0 branch to 84b28ec. This hash brings in the WoFS_v0 SDF. This PR will update the ufs-weather-model hash to 84b28ec in the authoritative develop branch and bring in the components for developers to use the WoFS_v0 SDF.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

TESTS CONDUCTED:

  • hera.intel
  • orion.intel
  • cheyenne.intel
  • cheyenne.gnu
  • gaea.intel
  • jet.intel
  • wcoss2.intel
  • NOAA Cloud (indicate which platform)
  • Jenkins
  • fundamental test suite
  • comprehensive tests (specify which if a subset was used)

CHECKLIST

  • My code follows the style guidelines in the Contributor's Guide
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code using the Code Reviewer's Guide
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • My changes need updates to the documentation. I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes do not require updates to the documentation (explain).
    @gspetro-NOAA has already updated the documentation in develop, noting that WoFS_v0 is a currently supported CCPP parameter.
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • New and existing tests pass with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published

@MichaelLueken MichaelLueken added ci-hera-intel-WE Kicks off automated workflow test on hera with intel ci-jet-intel-WE Kicks off automated workflow test on jet with intel labels Nov 18, 2022
@venitahagerty venitahagerty removed ci-jet-intel-WE Kicks off automated workflow test on jet with intel ci-hera-intel-WE Kicks off automated workflow test on hera with intel labels Nov 18, 2022
@venitahagerty
Copy link
Collaborator

venitahagerty commented Nov 18, 2022

Machine: hera
Compiler: intel
Job: WE
Repo location: /scratch1/BMC/zrtrr/rrfs_ci/autoci/pr/1128154471/20221118203510/ufs-srweather-app
Build was Successful
Rocoto jobs started
Long term tracking will be done on 10 experiments
If test failed, please make changes and add the following label back:
ci-hera-intel-WE
Experiment Succeeded on hera: grid_RRFS_CONUScompact_25km_ics_HRRR_lbcs_RAP_suite_RRFS_v1beta
Experiment Succeeded on hera: pregen_grid_orog_sfc_climo
Experiment Succeeded on hera: community_ensemble_2mems_stoch
Experiment Succeeded on hera: grid_RRFS_CONUScompact_25km_ics_HRRR_lbcs_RAP_suite_HRRR
Experiment Succeeded on hera: grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_2017_gfdlmp_regional
Experiment Succeeded on hera: grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v15p2
Experiment Succeeded on hera: grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_GSMGFS_lbcs_GSMGFS_suite_GFS_v15p2
Experiment Succeeded on hera: grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_RAP_suite_HRRR
Experiment Succeeded on hera: MET_ensemble_verification
Experiment Succeeded on hera: grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v16
All experiments completed

@venitahagerty
Copy link
Collaborator

venitahagerty commented Nov 18, 2022

Machine: jet
Compiler: intel
Job: WE
Repo location: /lfs1/BMC/nrtrr/rrfs_ci/autoci/pr/1128154471/20221118203509/ufs-srweather-app
Build was Successful
Rocoto jobs started
Long term tracking will be done on 10 experiments
If test failed, please make changes and add the following label back:
ci-jet-intel-WE
Experiment Succeeded on jet: nco_grid_RRFS_CONUScompact_25km_ics_HRRR_lbcs_RAP_suite_HRRR
Experiment Succeeded on jet: specify_DT_ATMOS_LAYOUT_XY_BLOCKSIZE
Experiment Succeeded on jet: custom_ESGgrid
Experiment Succeeded on jet: grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_RAP_suite_HRRR
Experiment Succeeded on jet: grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_GSMGFS_lbcs_GSMGFS_suite_GFS_v15p2
Experiment Succeeded on jet: custom_GFDLgrid
Experiment Succeeded on jet: grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v15p2
Experiment Succeeded on jet: specify_RESTART_INTERVAL
Experiment Succeeded on jet: specify_DOT_OR_USCORE
Experiment Succeeded on jet: grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v16
All experiments completed

@@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ endif()

# Build UFS weather model
if (BUILD_UFS)
list(APPEND TARGET_LIST ufs-weather-model)
list(APPEND TARGET_LIST UFS)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MichaelLueken This needs to be removved because it will re-introduce the bug with building without installing the ufs-weather-model.

EXTRN_MDL_FILES_LBCS:
- '{yy}{jjj}{hh}00{fcst_hr:02d}00'
task_run_fcst:
PREDEF_GRID_NAME: SUBCONUS_Ind_3km
Copy link
Collaborator

@danielabdi-noaa danielabdi-noaa Nov 19, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PREDEF_GRID_NAME should be in workflow: section after CCPP_PHYS_SUITE:, and then remove the task_run_fcst section.

FV3GFS_FILE_FMT_LBCS: grib2
USE_USER_STAGED_EXTRN_FILES: true
task_run_fcst:
PREDEF_GRID_NAME: SUBCONUS_Ind_3km
Copy link
Collaborator

@danielabdi-noaa danielabdi-noaa Nov 19, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment as above

@MichaelLueken
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@danielabdi-noaa Thank you very much for the review! I have updated the three files. Please let me know if you see anything else that needs to be addressed. Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@danielabdi-noaa danielabdi-noaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks good!

@MichaelLueken MichaelLueken added the run_we2e_coverage_tests Run the coverage set of SRW end-to-end tests label Nov 21, 2022
@MichaelLueken
Copy link
Collaborator Author

With the merging of PR #498 this morning, it is even more imperative that this work be reviewed and merged. The current develop doesn't have the necessary ufs-weather-model hash to use WoFS_v0, nor the necessary changes to files to utilize the new WoFS_v0 SDF. Please take a moment to review this work so that the necessary components to use WoFS_v0 are available in develop. Thanks!

@MichaelLueken MichaelLueken merged commit 4a9d1fe into ufs-community:develop Nov 30, 2022
@MichaelLueken MichaelLueken deleted the feature/update-ufs-wm-WoFS branch November 30, 2022 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
run_we2e_coverage_tests Run the coverage set of SRW end-to-end tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants