rt.sh failure on Frontera

[uturuncoglu]

Description

The RTs on Frontera sometimes fails with FAILED: DISK QUOTA ISSUE error. This seems to be due to the run_test.sh script and needs to include Frontera. Following is the proposed fix of the issue and it might be included to any outstanding PR.

diff --git a/tests/run_test.sh b/tests/run_test.sh
index 3ce47763..7cdf3ce7 100755
--- a/tests/run_test.sh
+++ b/tests/run_test.sh
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ if [[ ${skip_check_results} == false ]]; then
 
       else
         if [[ ${i##*.} == nc* ]] ; then
-          if [[ " orion hercules hera wcoss2 acorn derecho gaea jet s4 noaacloud " =~ ${MACHINE_ID} ]]; then
+          if [[ " orion hercules hera wcoss2 acorn derecho gaea jet s4 noaacloud frontera " =~ ${MACHINE_ID} ]]; then
             printf "USING NCCMP.." >> "${RT_LOG}"
             printf "USING NCCMP.."
               if [[ ${CMP_DATAONLY} == false ]]; then

To Reproduce:

Need to run one of the UFS Coastal RT on Frontera. I am not sure this could be reproduced by the UFS WM RTs.

Additional context

N/A

Output

output logs
If applicable, include relevant output logs.
Either drag and drop the entire log file here (if a long log) or

+ [[ -n /work2/01118/tg803972/frontera/ufs-weather-model/tests/logs/log_frontera/run_coastal_ike_shinnecock_atm2sch2ww3_intel.log ]]
+ FAILED_TEST_ID+=("${TEST_NAME} ${COMPILER}")
+ read -r line
++ printf '%02dh:%02dm:%02ds\n' 0 30 38
+ elapsed_time=00h:30m:38s
+ cat
+ [[ 0 -ne 0 ]]
+ [[ 1 -ne 0 ]]
+ echo 'Failed Tests:'
+ for j in '"${!FAILED_TESTS[@]}"'
+ echo '* TEST coastal_ike_shinnecock_atm2sch2ww3_intel: FAILED: DISK QUOTA ISSUE'
+ echo '-- LOG: /work2/01118/tg803972/frontera/ufs-weather-model/tests/logs/log_frontera/run_coastal_ike_shinnecock_atm2sch2ww3_intel.log'
+ [[ 1 -ne 0 ]]
+ for item in '"${FAILED_TEST_ID[@]}"'
+ echo 'coastal_ike_shinnecock_atm2sch2ww3 intel'
+ [[ 0 -eq 0 ]]
+ [[ 1 -eq 0 ]]
+ cat
+ echo 'REGRESSION TEST RESULT: FAILURE'
REGRESSION TEST RESULT: FAILURE
+ echo '******Regression Testing Script Completed******'

[gspetro-NOAA]

@uturuncoglu Have you added this change to a recent PR, or should we add in your proposed change? If we add it, are you willing to test the PR on Frontera (e.g., with the Coast RTs you mentioned)?

[uturuncoglu]

@gspetro-NOAA Yes. We have already in place in UFS Coastal Fork and it seems working fine. So, I think adding to UFS WM will not harm. For your reference,

https://github.com/oceanmodeling/ufs-weather-model/blob/6b1a4690ebf44d5064ea2505c2a63bc2f6369d66/tests/run_test.sh#L488