Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency jest-watch-typeahead to v2 #794

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 15, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
jest-watch-typeahead ^1.0.0 -> ^2.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jest-community/jest-watch-typeahead (jest-watch-typeahead)

v2.2.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v2.2.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v2.2.0

Compare Source

Features

2.1.1 (2022-08-25)

Bug Fixes

v2.1.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v2.1.0

Compare Source

Features
  • add support for Jest 29 (bebd216)

v2.0.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: update dependency ansi-escapes to v5 (#​87) (b990d44)
  • drop support for Node 12 and 17 (0f4b1b6)
BREAKING CHANGES
  • Drop Node 12 and Node 17

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-watch-typeahead-2.x branch from af9698e to 3abc11c Compare December 7, 2023 12:54
@GoetzGoerisch GoetzGoerisch merged commit 516519f into umati Dec 8, 2023
20 of 22 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/jest-watch-typeahead-2.x branch December 8, 2023 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant