Skip to content
Addison Phillips edited this page Nov 17, 2024 · 140 revisions

MessageFormat Working Group

Welcome to the home page for the MessageFormat Working Group, a subgroup of the Unicode CLDR-TC.

Charter

The Message Format Working Group (MFWG) is tasked with developing an industry standard for the representation of localizable message strings to be a successor to ICU MessageFormat. MFWG will recommend how to remove redundancies, make the syntax more usable, and support more complex features, such as gender, inflections, and speech. MFWG will also consider the integration of the new standard with programming environments, including, but not limited to, ICU, DOM, and ECMAScript, and with localization platform interchange. The output of MFWG will be a specification for the new syntax, which is expected to be on track to become a Unicode Technical Standard.

Participation / Joining the Working Group

We are looking for participation from software developers, localization engineers and others with experience in Internationalization (I18N) and Localization (L10N). If you wish to contribute to this work, please review the information about the Contributor License Agreement.

To follow this work:

  1. Apply to join our mailing list
  2. Watch this repository (use the "Watch" button in the upper right corner)

To contribute to this work, in addition to the above:

  1. Each individual MUST have a copy of the CLA on file.
  2. Individuals who are employees of Unicode Member organizations SHOULD contact their member representative. Individuals who are not employees of Unicode Member organizations MUST contact the chair to request Invited Expert status. Employees of Unicode Member organizations MAY also apply for Invited Expert status, subject to approval from their member representative.

Meeting Agenda

This is the agenda document for upcoming calls of the MessageFormat subcommittee. We normally meet weekly on Mondays at 9:30 Pacific (America/Los_Angeles). This is currently UTC+7.

See here for your local time.

Information on joining calls is found in the calendar invite.

Scribe

This block reserved for scribe rotation.

Recent scribes:

  • 2024-11-11 MIH
  • 2024-11-03 ECH
  • 2024-10-28 HGO
  • 2024-10-21 APP
  • 2024-10-14 MIH
  • 2024-10-07 TIM
  • 2024-09-30 EAO
  • 2024-09-09 HGO
  • 2024-09-02 (no quorum)
  • 2024-08-26 ECH
  • 2024-08-19 MIH, ECH
  • 2024-08-12 RGN
  • 2024-08-05 TIM
  • 2024-07-29 ECH
  • 2024-07-22 HGO
  • 2024-07-15 LCA, USA
  • 2024-07-08 MIH
  • 2024-07-01 TIM
  • 2024-06-24 STA
  • 2024-06-17 ECH
  • 2024-06-10 n/a
  • 2024-06-03 MRR
  • 2024-05-20 MIH
  • 2024-05-13 USA, TIM, ECH
  • 2024-05-06 TIM, ECH
  • 2024-04-29 ECH
  • 2024-04-22 MRR
  • 2024-04-15 MIH
  • 2024-04-08 MRR
  • 2024-03-25 TIM
  • 2024-03-18 MIH
  • 2024-03-04 RGN
  • 2024-02-26 ECH
  • 2024-02-xx everyone
  • 2024-02-12 MIH
  • 2024-02-05 SCA
  • 2024-01-29 TIM
  • 2024-01-22 STA
  • 2024-01-15 MIH
  • 2024-01-08 SCA (removing pre-2024 history)

Notes Document for The Upcoming Call

NOTE WELL

The next regular meeting will be 18 November 2024 and is a Regular WG Teleconference call.

Homework

  • Review all PRs!
  • Review all issues for blockers or closing

Agenda

Topic: Info Share

Are we done?

Call to submit MessageFormat 2.0 for balloting by the working group. If approved in next week’s call, the resulting specification would be (hopefully) approved by CLDR-TC for publication in v46.1 and made final in v47 in the spring. This is the last chance to discuss if we have accomplished our goals.

Topic: Cleanup

There is a need for an end-to-end cleanup of the spec (removing Tech Preview comments from v45, addressing minor editorial issues). The chair proposes to make a PR to accomplish this before labeling the official release candidate and producing HTML in the LDML spec. Let’s discuss the logistics of this.

Topic: Resolving :math or offset (#932)

The chair merged #932 in spite of Mihai’s unresolved comment. We need to consider if changes to :math should be made or the function reverted in favor of e.g. an `offset` option. PR link: view it on GitHub

Topic: Unit Formatting (#922)

Last week we discussed taking :unit as optional if our work was done. Propose merging it.

Topic: PR Review

PR Description Recommendation
#944 Address “implementation-defined” literal and type values Discuss, Merge
#943 Rename :currency option currencySign as sign Discuss, Merge
#942 Always apply isolation when u:dir is set Discuss, Merge
#941 Linkify stability policy Merge
#940 Add tests for :currency Merge
#939 Drop exp value for :number tests with bad option values Merge
#923 Test schema: allow src property to either be a string or array of strings Discuss, Merge
#922 Implement :unit as OPTIONAL in the registry Merge
#911 Define locale options for :datetime :date and :time Discuss, Merge
#584 Add new terms to glossary Reject

Topic: Issue review

https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues

Currently we have 31 open (was 30 last time).

  • 14 are tagged for 46.1 (3 are blocker-candidate)
  • 6 are tagged for 47
  • 4 are tagged “Seek-Feedback-in-Preview”
  • 5 are tagged “Future”
  • 6 are Preview-Feedback
  • 7 are resolve-candidate and proposed for close.
  • 3 are Agenda+ and proposed for discussion.
  • None are ballots
Issue Description Recommendation
#937 Clarify boilerplate about operand and resolved value Agenda+
#936 Add short timezone identifies Agenda+
#935 Well-formed vs. valid Agenda+
#847 Conformance with UAX31 and UTS55 Blocker-candidate
#843 Create complete tests for syntax Blocker-candidate
#838 Unit and currency formatting should be supported Blocker-candidate, Resolve (waiting on #922)
#856 Update CLDR test data Resolve
#819 [FEEDBACK] semantic diff between local and input Resolve
#818 [FEEDBACK] reuse of :function between annotation and output Resolve
#724 [FEEDBACK] MF unquoted literals Resolve
#680 Restrict literals for :date and :time Resolve
#663 Provide structure in the registry for distinguishing types of options Resolve

Topic: Design Status

What is the status of our various design docs?

Doc Description Status
dataflow-composability Data Flow for Composable Functions Proposed (Obsolete?)
maintaining-registry Maintaining the function registry Proposed, Discuss
number-selection Define how selection on numbers happens Revision Proposed
Accepted, Obsolete, and Rejected Designs
Doc Description Status
function-composition-part-1 Function Composition Obsolete
beauty-contest Choose between syntax options Obsolete
selection-matching-options Selection Matching Options (ballot) Obsolete
syntax-exploration-2 Balloting of the revised syntax used in the Tech Preview Obsolete
variants A collection of message examples which require a branching logic to handle grammatical variations Obsolete
formatted-parts Define how format-to-parts works Rejected
quoted-literals Document the rationale for including quoted literals in MF and for choosing the | as the quote symbol Accepted
builtin-registry-capabilities Tech Preview default registry definition Accepted
code-mode-introducer Choose the pattern for complex messages Accepted
data-driven-tests Capture the planned approach for the test suite Accepted
default-registry-and-mf1-compatibility Default Registry and MF1 Compatibility Accepted
delimiting-variant-patterns Delimiting of Patterns in Complex Messages (Ballot) Accepted
error-handling Decide whether and what implementations do after a runtime error Accepted
exact-match-selector-options Choose the name for the “exact match” selector function (this is :string) Accepted
expression-attributes Define how attributes may be attached to expressions Accepted
open-close-placeholders Describe the use cases and requirements for placeholders that enclose parts of a pattern Accepted
overriding-extending-namespacing Defines how externally-authored functions can appear in a message; how externally authored options can appear; and effect of namespacing Accepted
pattern-exterior-whitespace Specify how whitespace inside of a pattern (at the start/end) works Accepted
string-selection-formatting Define how selection and formatting of string values takes place. Accepted
variable-mutability Describe how variables are named and how externally passed variables and internally defined variables interact Accepted
bidi-usability Manage bidi isolation Accepted
selection-declaration Effect of selectors on subsequent placeholders Accepted

Topic: AOB?