-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 624
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
scheme: add support for Racket #1877
Comments
Could you open a pull request? |
I don't know Racket well. As far as reading its web site quikcly, racket can switch grammer (syntax?) for the input file with What we need is a Rapcker parser which recognizes Which non-S-exp language is popoular as Racker language extentsion? |
Racket is practically always written using s-expressions. I believe people only switch syntax for experiments. I think the Scheme parser is sufficient. Otherwise, you would need to maintain a huge number of subparsers that aren't used by many people (e.g. a parser for Algol 60, parsers for the endless list of experimental languages made by the Racket community).
There aren't really any. The only mainstream one is the Scribble language ( |
I see. Thank you. |
Solved by #2315. Sorry to be late for solving this issue. |
Add support for the Racket language.
The Scheme parser could be reused for Racket. Racket file extensions (e.g.
*.rkt
) could be added to these lines:ctags/parsers/scheme.c
Lines 113 to 118 in e522743
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: