Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scheme: Add racket support to scheme parser #2315

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2019
Merged

scheme: Add racket support to scheme parser #2315

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2019

Conversation

plv
Copy link
Contributor

@plv plv commented Nov 10, 2019

Addressing #1877 by adding support for the .rkt extensions. Change is simple because syntax is the same. Tested locally on some Racket source.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 86.311% when pulling dbeba03 on plv:racket-support into 47de0ff on universal-ctags:master.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2315 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2315   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.18%   86.18%           
=======================================
  Files         177      177           
  Lines       35863    35863           
=======================================
  Hits        30910    30910           
  Misses       4953     4953
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
parsers/scheme.c 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 47de0ff...dbeba03. Read the comment docs.

@masatake masatake merged commit 0a3b35d into universal-ctags:master Nov 11, 2019
@masatake
Copy link
Member

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants