Update docs/optlib #2032
Update docs/optlib #2032
Conversation
I see. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. |
|
Neutral voice is better. I didn't do so because I could not do in my English skill. If you are interested in improving the other parts of ctags in the long term, let me know. I cannot do much for you in rerun but I can help you to convert Elixir parser to mtable-regex based :-P. |
|
I will resume work with this in a few days. Thank you for the compliment! Although my English isn't so good, hope it serves you well! Thank you for the invitation! But I have to refuse right now due to internet availability issues. When that improves, I'll let you know! |
|
I see. |
| :file:`.ctags` extension under the previously specified directories. If you have | ||
| multiple parser definitions, put them in different files. | ||
| To make easier the maintenance a parser defined using the options, you can put | ||
| each language parser in a different options file. Universal-ctags doesn't |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
SELF NOTE: each language parser => each parser
|
Though using natural voice is better, the changes improve the documents much. So I will merge this after modifying the change a bit. |
_roles,_fields,_extras)In lines 1573 to 1575 and 1621 to 1626 and maybe others, I used the first person ("Here I will explain...") because the paragraphs were written that way, but in no way that means my person (@dreamtigers) is the voice doing the explanation. In any case, it should be @masatake, with their permission. If it's an issue, I can rewrite those sections to use a neutral voice.
Before merging this, I will open an issue to discuss some doubts I have with some sections. Should those doubts be resolved, I can commit the additional changes, and then this pull request can be merged successfully.