Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update kotlin parser #3841

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2023
Merged

Conversation

dolik-rce
Copy link
Contributor

There has been a few small improvements to the Kotlin language specification this year, so it's time to update the grammar for the kotlin parser.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (35abbb1) 85.05% compared to head (a41827e) 85.05%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3841   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.05%   85.05%           
=======================================
  Files         228      228           
  Lines       53982    53982           
=======================================
  Hits        45914    45914           
  Misses       8068     8068           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@masatake masatake self-assigned this Oct 31, 2023
@masatake
Copy link
Member

masatake commented Nov 3, 2023

@dolik-rce Thank you. Don't we need a test case for the change?

@dolik-rce
Copy link
Contributor Author

@masatake: I don't think so. The changes are really minor and the existing tests only check basic kotlin syntax.

It might be good idea to try to compose a kotlin file that would cover all the rules, but it would be quite big and tedious to construct, so it wouldn't fit into this PR.

@masatake
Copy link
Member

masatake commented Nov 3, 2023

@dolik-rce I see. Thank you.

@masatake masatake merged commit 184d474 into universal-ctags:master Nov 3, 2023
42 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants