feat: add types:extend hook

[mukundshah]

🔗 Linked issue

#1710

❓ Type of change

• 📖 Documentation (updates to the documentation, readme, or JSdoc annotations)
• 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
• 👌 Enhancement (improving an existing functionality like performance)
• ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
• ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

📚 Description

📝 Checklist

• I have linked an issue or discussion.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.

[mukundshah]

@pi0 any update on this?

[pi0]

@mukundshah Sorry for delay it is on my check list to review asap for next minor 👍🏼

[mukundshah]

@pi0 no worries; Thank you for reply and update ;)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (e8fa771) 51.94% compared to head (01d9a3c) 76.17%.
Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 01d9a3c differs from pull request most recent head a826987. Consider uploading reports for the commit a826987 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1715       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   51.94%   76.17%   +24.23%     
===========================================
  Files         174       76       -98     
  Lines       12035     8031     -4004     
  Branches      913      804      -109     
===========================================
- Hits         6252     6118      -134     
+ Misses       5686     1911     -3775     
+ Partials       97        2       -95     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pi0]

/cc @danielroe i am thinking about types.handler for more naming consistency. Also would love your idea about whole naming.

[danielroe]

It might be worth deferring this until I finish updating #1532 as we will probably want to change what we pass in the hook.

[pi0]

Sure we can wait. Also this is an object we are passing so if you are generally okay with naming, we can merge and iterate to extend it later. Please let me know which method you prefer.

[danielroe]

Your thought on naming seems good to me 👍
And I'm happy to merge + iterate.