feat(cloudflare-kv-http): support ttl for setItem

[SolarisUp]

🔗 Linked issue

#32

❓ Type of change

• 📖 Documentation (updates to the documentation, readme, or JSdoc annotations)
• 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
• 👌 Enhancement (improving an existing functionality like performance)
• ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
• ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

📚 Description

Add new feature - ttl for storage data in KV via http. This feature prevent extra costs for using KV and resolve #32

📝 Checklist

• I have linked an issue or discussion.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.

[SolarisUp]

To check the exact implementation from the Wrangler developers, you can go to this GitHub link

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 16.66667% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 66.59%. Comparing base (4d61c78) to head (2ddeba3).
Report is 61 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/drivers/cloudflare-kv-http.ts	16.66%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #448      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.05%   66.59%   +1.53%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        4055     4131      +76     
  Branches      487      511      +24     
==========================================
+ Hits         2638     2751     +113     
+ Misses       1408     1371      -37     
  Partials        9        9              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[SolarisUp]

@pi0 hi, do I need to cover the code with tests? Also, when can this code be released?

[sisou]

From the code of the bindings Cloudflare KV driver (cloudflare-kv-binding.ts), it looks like that one doesn't support the ttl shorthand. However, it accepts the forwarded 3rd argument, so using expirationTtl should already work. Maybe you can add ttl support to that, too, if expirationTtl is not specified, but ttl is.

[barberj]

@sisou How is this approach: #470

[pi0]

Thanks!