Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: added DatePicker styles #1087

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rajamatt
Copy link
Contributor

GitHub Issue: #1063

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Documentation content changes

Description

  • Adds documentation for DatePicker styles and lightweight styling keys.

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Commits must be following the Conventional Commits specification
  • Tested UWP
  • Tested iOS
  • Tested Android
  • Tested WASM
  • Tested MacOS
  • Contains No breaking changes

    If the pull request contains breaking changes, commit message must contain a detailed description of the action to take for the consumer of this library. As explained by the Conventional Commits specification

@rajamatt rajamatt self-assigned this Jul 25, 2023
@rajamatt rajamatt force-pushed the dev/mara/docs-datepicker-styling branch 2 times, most recently from d748cb4 to 8b4c119 Compare July 25, 2023 18:53
fix: added column

docs: added DatePicker styles

fix: xiao changes

docs: added DatePicker styles

fix: xiao changes2

docs: added DatePicker styles
@rajamatt rajamatt force-pushed the dev/mara/docs-datepicker-styling branch from 36de705 to 335984d Compare July 25, 2023 18:54
@rajamatt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Waiting on #1097 before merging this.

@carlh98 carlh98 requested a review from Xiaoy312 July 26, 2023 18:24
@kazo0
Copy link
Collaborator

kazo0 commented Aug 9, 2023

Closed since this will be addressed by #1118

@kazo0 kazo0 closed this Aug 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants