Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Ensure all progressrings stop #1100

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2024

Conversation

nickrandolph
Copy link
Contributor

GitHub Issue (If applicable): #1099

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix

What is the current behavior?

Progressring in loadingcontenttemplate not being stopped - the search was stopping at the contenttemplate, rather than interrogating all children

What is the new behavior?

Progressring is being stopped

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

Other information

Internal Issue (If applicable):

@nickrandolph nickrandolph force-pushed the dev/nr/progressringstoprunningplease branch from 4e5e6a0 to 3b2ae6d Compare April 5, 2024 15:40
@jeromelaban
Copy link
Member

@Mergifyio backport release/stable/6.0

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Apr 5, 2024

backport release/stable/6.0

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

@agneszitte agneszitte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any tests needed to verify this?

@jeromelaban
Copy link
Member

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jeromelaban jeromelaban merged commit a03ae66 into main Apr 6, 2024
25 checks passed
@jeromelaban jeromelaban deleted the dev/nr/progressringstoprunningplease branch April 6, 2024 01:58
jeromelaban added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2024
….0/pr-1100

fix: Ensure all progressrings stop (backport #1100)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants