Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why not ship a config.toml instead of forking? #11

Open
adRn-s opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Why not ship a config.toml instead of forking? #11

adRn-s opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested

Comments

@adRn-s
Copy link

adRn-s commented May 23, 2024

Keybindings are customizable in Helix editor. Right? There was any limitations? It would be great to see on readme, at least some hint.

@usagi-flow
Copy link
Owner

usagi-flow commented May 24, 2024

Good question! Indeed, Helix is completely built upon the selection -> verb model. There is currently no way to get around this just by adjusting the configuration. It's possibly to "get a bit closer" to a Vim feeling; there's even a project doing exactly that. But without implemented support for Vim keybindings, we can't there where we want to be.

It's a good idea to put this somewhere. I think I'm leaning a bit more towards an FAQ in a wiki rather than cluttering the README even more (I believe short, clean and concise READMEs are better).

I'll leave this issue open as a reminder for that.

@usagi-flow usagi-flow added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested labels May 24, 2024
@LGUG2Z
Copy link

LGUG2Z commented Jul 3, 2024

I have started directing people from helix-vim to here :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants