Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review Section 4 and alignment with BR SC6 #552

Closed
3 tasks done
lachellel opened this issue Nov 7, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #567
Closed
3 tasks done

Review Section 4 and alignment with BR SC6 #552

lachellel opened this issue Nov 7, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #567

Comments

@lachellel
Copy link
Contributor

lachellel commented Nov 7, 2018

SC6: https://cabforum.org/2018/09/14/ballot-sc6-revocation-timeline-extension/

  • Review CP and CPS for "disclose problem reporting mechanisms in a standard location: CPS section 1.5.2."

  • Review Section 4.9.1.1 in both CP and CPS(s)

  • Review Section 4.9.1.2 in both CP and CPS(s)

weirdscience pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2019
Fixes #552 
- Section 4.9.1.1 | Added a revocation reason for subscriber certificates due to demonstration of subscriber private key compromise.
- Section 4.9.3 | Require clear instructions be provided in CPS Section 1.5.2.
- Section 4.9.5 | Update for new 24 hour reporting timeline and remove activity requirements based on CRL issuance time.
- Appendix A | Definition of Key compromise matches.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant