Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve markets with mech requests #91

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024

Conversation

jmoreira-valory
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmoreira-valory jmoreira-valory commented Feb 21, 2024

Merge main branch (bump)
Resolve markets with mech requests

@jmoreira-valory jmoreira-valory changed the base branch from feat/integrate_resolve_market_reasoning_tool to main March 3, 2024 22:12
Comment on lines +2337 to +2338
question_id = question["question"]["id"].lower()
if question_id in self.shared_state.questions_requested_mech:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are the questions_requested_mech not in the synced db?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was the similar approach designed previously. Since it's a single-agent service, it's easier to use the shared state in this case.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense but we need to remember if we convert this to a multi-agent service.

@jmoreira-valory jmoreira-valory merged commit c6d8e2c into main Mar 4, 2024
6 checks passed
@jmoreira-valory jmoreira-valory deleted the feat/close_with_mech_requests branch April 20, 2024 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants