Recover from panic in body write #687
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Update from upstream
erikdubbelboer
requested changes
Nov 3, 2019
server.go
Outdated
| @@ -2219,6 +2219,11 @@ func writeResponse(ctx *RequestCtx, w *bufio.Writer) error { | |||
| panic("BUG: cannot write timed out response") | |||
| } | |||
| err := ctx.Response.Write(w) | |||
| if err != nil { | |||
| if panicErr, ok := err.(*ErrBodyStreamWritePanic); ok { | |||
| ctx.logger.Printf("panic while writing response: %s", panicErr.Error()) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think its necessary to log this here. The error will go all the way up to workerpool.go#L230 where it will be logged anyways.
|
@erikdubbelboer done. Unfortunately this doesn't cover |
|
I think we can catch the So lets save that for another pull request. |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Possibly a successor of #646.
Went as per @erikdubbelboer suggestion (if I understood it correctly). If the general idea is acceptable, will add tests.
Thanks.