Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update docs #4466

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 22, 2024
Merged

docs: update docs #4466

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 22, 2024

Conversation

anncwb
Copy link
Collaborator

@anncwb anncwb commented Sep 22, 2024

Description

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • Please, don't make changes to pnpm-lock.yaml unless you introduce a new test example.

Checklist

ℹ️ Check all checkboxes - this will indicate that you have done everything in accordance with the rules in CONTRIBUTING.

  • If you introduce new functionality, document it. You can run documentation with pnpm run docs:dev command.
  • Run the tests with pnpm test.
  • Changes in changelog are generated from PR name. Please, make sure that it explains your changes in an understandable manner. Please, prefix changeset messages with feat:, fix:, perf:, docs:, or chore:.
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added support for a new Textarea component in forms, enhancing component variety.
    • Expanded the documentation for the Vben Form component, including new sections and examples for better usability.
    • Introduced a new sidebar item for 'CountToAnimator 数字动画' in the documentation.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling in form validation to log errors effectively.
  • Style

    • Updated sidebar labels for clarity by removing the "Vben" prefix from certain items.
  • Chores

    • Improved internal documentation and comments for clarity on model properties and validation rules.

@anncwb anncwb added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 22, 2024
@anncwb anncwb requested review from vince292007 and a team as code owners September 22, 2024 05:22
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 22, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 0421081

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 22, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@anncwb has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 66e76a3 and 0421081.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces enhancements to form handling within a Vue.js application using the Ant Design Vue component library. Key changes include the addition of a new component type, Textarea, updates to validation rules, and improvements to the documentation of form components. The changes aim to expand the adaptability of forms and clarify the configuration and validation processes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/web-antd/src/adapter/form.ts Added Textarea component type to FormComponentType, updated setupVbenForm to include this new component, and clarified model property names and validation rules.
apps/web-ele/src/adapter/form.ts Modified required validation logic to explicitly check for undefined, null, or empty values.
apps/web-naive/src/adapter/form.ts Similar modification to required validation logic as in web-ele.
docs/.vitepress/config/zh.mts Updated sidebar item labels by removing the "Vben" prefix and added a new sidebar item for CountToAnimator.
docs/src/_env/adapter/form.ts Established a form component setup, defining various UI elements and validation rules, and exported necessary functions and types.
docs/src/components/common-ui/vben-form.md Expanded documentation with new sections on adapters, API details, and TypeScript type definitions for form configurations.
packages/@core/base/shared/src/utils/inference.ts Introduced isBoolean function to check if a value is of type boolean.
packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-api.ts Modified validate method in FormApi class to include error handling and logging.
playground/src/adapter/form.ts Added Textarea component type and updated the form setup accordingly, including comments for clarity.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement

Suggested reviewers

  • vince292007

🐇 In the garden where forms bloom,
A Textarea joins, dispelling gloom.
With validations strong and styles so bright,
Our components dance in the soft moonlight.
New hooks and props, oh what a delight!
Let's celebrate these changes tonight! 🌙✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 17

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
docs/src/demos/vben-form/rules/index.vue (1)

180-184: Consider removing form values from the success message in production.

The onSubmit function correctly handles form submission and displays a success message using message.success. Including the submitted form values in the success message can be helpful for debugging purposes.

However, for production environments, consider removing the form values from the success message to avoid exposing potentially sensitive information to users.

function onSubmit(values: Record<string, any>) {
  message.success({
-   content: `form values: ${JSON.stringify(values)}`,
+   content: 'Form submitted successfully!',
  });
}
playground/src/views/examples/form/api.vue (1)

117-117: Improve localization support for the success message.

Adding a success message to provide user feedback is a good practice. However, the message is hardcoded in Chinese, which could be a localization concern if the application needs to support multiple languages.

Consider extracting the success message to a localization file or using a localization library for better maintainability and localization support. For example, you can use the vue-i18n library to manage translations:

-message.success('字段 `fieldOptions` 下拉选项更新成功。');
+message.success(t('form.updateSuccess', { field: 'fieldOptions' }));

And define the translation in the localization file:

{
  "form": {
    "updateSuccess": "Field '{field}' dropdown options updated successfully."
  }
}
docs/src/demos/vben-form/dynamic/index.vue (1)

7-7: Translate comments to English for consistency

The code contains comments in Chinese. For better maintainability and readability, especially in a multilingual team, it's recommended to translate comments to English.

Apply this diff to translate the comments:

  // 提交函数
+ // Submission function
...
  // 随意一个字段改变时,都会触发
+ // Triggered when any field changes
...
  // 通过Dom控制销毁
+ // Destroyed through DOM control
...
  // 通过css控制隐藏
+ // Hidden via CSS
...
  // 只有指定的字段改变时,才会触发
+ // Only triggers when specified fields change
...
  // 字段名
+ // Field name
...
  // 界面显示的label
+ // Label displayed on the UI
...
  // 当字段1的值为`123`时,必填
+ // Required when the value of field1 is '123'
...
  // 当字段2的值为`123`时,更改下拉选项
+ // When field2 value is '123', change the dropdown options
...
  // 大屏一行显示3个,中屏一行显示2个,小屏一行显示1个
+ // Display 3 columns on large screens, 2 on medium screens, 1 on small screens

Also applies to: 15-15, 25-25, 32-32, 52-52, 65-65, 86-86, 104-104, 151-151, 155-155

docs/src/demos/vben-form/api/index.vue (1)

1-56: Consider translating comments to English for consistency

The code contains comments in Chinese. For better team collaboration and broader accessibility, it's advisable to use English for code comments and documentation.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dac8070 and 7c0c5cd.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (26)
  • apps/web-antd/src/adapter/form.ts (4 hunks)
  • docs/.vitepress/theme/components/site-layout.vue (1 hunks)
  • docs/.vitepress/theme/styles/base.css (1 hunks)
  • docs/package.json (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/_env/adapter/form.ts (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/_env/adapter/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/common-ui/vben-form.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/demos/vben-form/api/index.vue (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/demos/vben-form/basic/index.vue (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/demos/vben-form/custom/index.vue (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/demos/vben-form/dynamic/index.vue (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/demos/vben-form/query/index.vue (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/demos/vben-form/rules/index.vue (1 hunks)
  • docs/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/@core/base/shared/src/utils/tests/inference.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/@core/base/shared/src/utils/inference.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-api.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-render/dependencies.ts (3 hunks)
  • packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-render/form-field.vue (2 hunks)
  • packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/types.ts (5 hunks)
  • packages/effects/common-ui/src/components/captcha/point-selection-captcha/index.vue (1 hunks)
  • packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/notification/notification.vue (2 hunks)
  • playground/src/adapter/form.ts (4 hunks)
  • playground/src/views/examples/form/api.vue (1 hunks)
  • playground/src/views/examples/form/custom.vue (2 hunks)
  • playground/src/views/examples/form/dynamic.vue (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Lint (windows-latest)
packages/@core/base/shared/src/utils/inference.ts

[warning] 16-16:
Missing JSDoc @returns description

GitHub Check: Lint (ubuntu-latest)
packages/@core/base/shared/src/utils/inference.ts

[warning] 16-16:
Missing JSDoc @returns description

GitHub Check: Test (ubuntu-latest)
packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-api.ts

[failure] 225-225: packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/tests/form-api.test.ts > formApi > should validate form
TypeError: Cannot convert undefined or null to object
❯ FormApi.validate packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-api.ts:225:16
❯ packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/tests/form-api.test.ts:142:21

Additional comments not posted (60)
docs/src/_env/adapter/index.ts (1)

1-1: LGTM!

The change improves the organization and accessibility of the codebase by providing a centralized entry point for the form module. It follows a common pattern in TypeScript and does not introduce any potential issues or side effects.

docs/.vitepress/theme/styles/base.css (1)

9-11: LGTM!

The new CSS rule looks good. It removes the default margins on paragraph elements within the .form-valid-error class, which is likely intended to improve the spacing and alignment of error messages.

The change is small, focused, and does not appear to have any negative impact on the existing styles.

docs/tsconfig.json (1)

4-9: LGTM!

The changes in the compilerOptions section are beneficial:

  • Setting the baseUrl to the current directory establishes a clear base path for module resolution.
  • Defining the paths mapping with the "#/*" alias provides a convenient way to import modules from the ./src/_env/ directory.

These changes can improve code readability and maintainability by reducing the need for relative import paths.

docs/package.json (3)

10-12: LGTM!

The addition of the "imports" section with the mapping "#/*": "./src/_env/*" is a valid configuration. This can be useful for organizing environment-specific configurations and keeping the import paths clean.


16-18: LGTM!

The addition of the new dependencies @vben/hooks, @vben/locales, and @vben/preferences with the "workspace:*" version is a valid change. These internal packages likely provide useful functionalities for the project.


20-20: LGTM!

The addition of the ant-design-vue dependency with the "catalog:" version is a valid change. This suggests that the project will be using Ant Design Vue components, which can provide a consistent and feature-rich UI.

playground/src/views/examples/form/custom.vue (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The renaming of the BaseForm variable to Form is consistent with the AI-generated summary and does not introduce any functional changes to the component. The useVbenForm function is used correctly to create the Form component.


68-72: LGTM!

The renaming of the <BaseForm> component to <Form> in the template section is consistent with the variable renaming in the script section. The usage of the <Form> component and the field3 slot is correct and does not introduce any functional issues.

docs/src/demos/vben-form/custom/index.vue (5)

1-60: LGTM!

The script section of the component is well-structured and follows the expected format. The usage of the useVbenForm function and the form configuration are correct.


62-68: LGTM!

The template section of the component is well-structured and uses the Form component correctly. The slot for the third field is defined properly and allows for customization of the input.


8-53: LGTM!

The form configuration is well-structured and follows the expected format. The common properties, layout, and schema are correctly defined. The input fields have different configurations, which are all valid and demonstrate various customization options.


55-59: LGTM!

The onSubmit function is correctly defined as the submission handler for the form. It receives the form values as a parameter and displays a success message containing the stringified form values.


64-66: LGTM!

The slot for the third field is correctly defined using the #field3 syntax. It receives the slotProps as a parameter and binds them to the rendered Input component. The placeholder attribute is also set on the Input component.

docs/src/demos/vben-form/query/index.vue (1)

1-94: Excellent work on the query form component!

The component is well-structured, follows best practices, and provides a reusable and configurable query form. Here are some positive aspects:

  • The use of the useVbenForm hook from the adapter ensures consistency and maintainability.
  • The form schema is defined using a declarative approach, making it easy to understand and maintain.
  • The form fields are configured with appropriate props and placeholders.
  • The form submission is handled properly, displaying the form values as a success message.
  • The component is well-documented with comments explaining the purpose and usage of various options.

Overall, this component is a great addition to the project and can be easily integrated into other parts of the application.

apps/web-antd/src/adapter/form.ts (6)

30-30: LGTM!

The Textarea component is correctly imported from ant-design-vue to be used as a form component type.


Line range hint 36-58: LGTM!

The Textarea component is correctly added to the FormComponentType type definition to be used as a form component type.


87-87: LGTM!

The Textarea component is correctly added to the list of components in the setupVbenForm function to be used as a form component type.


93-94: LGTM!

The comment correctly clarifies that the default model property name for Ant Design Vue components is value.


Line range hint 96-103: LGTM!

The comment correctly clarifies that some components use checked or fileList as the model property name, and the modelPropNameMap object correctly maps the model property name for specific components.


Line range hint 105-119: LGTM!

The comments correctly clarify that the required rule is for input fields and the selectRequired rule is for selection fields, and that the error messages for these rules include internationalization support. The code for the required and selectRequired rules is consistent with the comments.

playground/src/adapter/form.ts (6)

30-30: LGTM!

The Textarea component is correctly imported from ant-design-vue to be used as a form component type.


54-54: LGTM!

The Textarea component is correctly added to the FormComponentType union type to be used as a valid form component type.


87-87: LGTM!

The Textarea component is correctly registered in the components object of the setupVbenForm function to be used as a valid form component.


93-93: LGTM!

The comment correctly clarifies that the default model property name for Ant Design Vue components is value, which is consistent with the baseModelPropName configuration.


Line range hint 96-103: LGTM!

The comment correctly clarifies that some components use alternative model property names, and the modelPropNameMap object correctly maps specific components to their alternative model property names.


105-110: LGTM!

The comments correctly clarify the purpose and internationalization of the validation rules for required input and select fields, and the validation rules correctly use the $t function to adapt the error messages for internationalization.

Also applies to: 112-117

packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-render/dependencies.ts (4)

9-9: LGTM!

The import statement is correct and aligns with the changes made to handle boolean values for whenIf, show, and disabled parameters.


77-79: LGTM!

The code segment correctly handles the case when whenIf is a boolean value and returns early when it evaluates to false, aligning with the expected behavior.


86-88: LGTM!

The code segment correctly handles the case when show is a boolean value and returns early when it evaluates to false, aligning with the expected behavior.


101-102: LGTM!

The code segment correctly handles the case when disabled is a boolean value and sets isDisabled directly to the boolean value, aligning with the expected behavior.

packages/@core/base/shared/src/utils/inference.ts (1)

13-20: LGTM!

The isBoolean function implementation looks good. The logic is correct, and the function signature and return type are properly defined.

Tools
GitHub Check: Lint (windows-latest)

[warning] 16-16:
Missing JSDoc @returns description

GitHub Check: Lint (ubuntu-latest)

[warning] 16-16:
Missing JSDoc @returns description

packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/notification/notification.vue (2)

84-84: LGTM!

The :disabled attribute is correctly set based on the notifications array length to prevent unnecessary interactions when there are no notifications.


135-140: LGTM!

The :disabled attribute is correctly set based on the notifications array length to prevent unnecessary interactions when there are no notifications.

packages/effects/common-ui/src/components/captcha/point-selection-captcha/index.vue (2)

165-165: LGTM!

The change to use a more generic border-border class for the border styles is a good refactor. It improves consistency and maintainability by centralizing border styles.


169-169: LGTM!

The change to use border-border and flex-center classes is a good refactor. It improves consistency and maintainability by centralizing commonly used styles.

docs/src/demos/vben-form/rules/index.vue (2)

1-185: LGTM!

The script section of the Vue component is well-structured and follows best practices. The form schema is comprehensive and includes various field types and validation rules. The usage of the useVbenForm hook and the onSubmit function is correct.


187-189: LGTM!

The template section correctly renders the form component using the <Form /> tag. There are no issues with this code segment.

packages/@core/base/shared/src/utils/__tests__/inference.test.ts (1)

100-113: LGTM!

The isBoolean test suite provides comprehensive coverage for the isBoolean function. The test cases verify the expected behavior for both boolean and non-boolean values, covering a good range of input types.

docs/src/demos/vben-form/basic/index.vue (4)

1-5: LGTM!

The script setup and imports follow best practices and are properly organized.


6-218: LGTM!

The useVbenForm hook configuration follows a clear and organized structure. The usage of commonConfig, handleSubmit, and layout options is appropriate and consistent.


222-226: LGTM!

The onSubmit function is well-defined and properly handles the form submission. The usage of message.success provides appropriate feedback to the user, and including the stringified form values in the success message can be helpful for debugging.


229-231: LGTM!

The template section properly renders the BaseForm component without any unnecessary props or event listeners. The usage of the component matches the configuration defined in the script section.

packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/types.ts (6)

91-91: LGTM!

The change to the disabled property type definition in the FormItemDependencies interface looks good. Allowing a direct boolean value in addition to a function that returns a boolean provides more flexibility without causing any issues.


96-96: LGTM!

The change to the if property type definition in the FormItemDependencies interface looks good. Allowing a direct boolean value in addition to a function that returns a boolean provides more flexibility without causing any issues, similar to the disabled property.


110-110: LGTM!

The change to the show property type definition in the FormItemDependencies interface looks good. Allowing a direct boolean value in addition to a function that returns a boolean provides more flexibility without causing any issues, similar to the disabled and if properties.


144-144: LGTM!

The change to the default value annotation for the formFieldProps property in the FormCommonConfig interface looks good. Updating the annotation to indicate an empty object as the default value aligns it with the actual default value and type of the property. This change improves the documentation without affecting the functionality.


164-164: LGTM!

The change to the default value annotation for the labelClass property in the FormCommonConfig interface looks good. Updating the annotation to indicate an empty string as the default value aligns it with the actual default value of the property. This change improves the documentation without affecting the functionality.


298-298: LGTM!

The addition of the default value annotation for the showDefaultActions property in the VbenFormProps interface looks good. Specifying true as the default value improves the documentation and clarity of the property's default behavior. This change enhances the code's readability without affecting its functionality.

packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-render/form-field.vue (2)

88-90: LGTM!

The introduction of the visible computed property is a good refactor. It encapsulates the visibility logic based on isIf and isShow, making the code more readable and maintainable.


93-95: Looks good!

The changes to shouldRequired and fieldRules computed properties correctly incorporate the new visible computed property. By returning early when the field is not visible, it ensures that the required status and validation rules are only applied to visible fields. This improves the consistency and efficiency of the form handling logic.

Also applies to: 124-126

docs/src/components/common-ui/vben-form.md (7)

7-15: LGTM!

The introduction provides good context about the form component's adaptability to various UI frameworks. The info block also conveys an important message about the flexibility to use native or custom components based on the user's needs.


17-157: Great job documenting the adapter section!

The adapter section provides valuable information about adapting the form component to different UI frameworks. The Ant Design Vue adapter example is comprehensive and well-documented, making it easy for users to understand how to set up and configure the adapter for their specific UI framework.


159-165: Useful tip about potential issues in examples.

The basic usage section is crucial for users to understand how to get started with the form component. The tip about potential internationalization and theme color issues in the examples is helpful to avoid confusion and clarify that they won't occur in actual usage.


167-201: Comprehensive coverage of form component features.

The code segment covers various important topics related to the form component, including query form, form validation, form linking, custom components, and common operations. The brief descriptions and demo previews for each topic provide users with a good understanding of the features and how to implement them.


203-241: Clear explanation of the useVbenForm API.

The API section provides a clear explanation of how to use the useVbenForm function and what it returns. The code example demonstrates how to destructure the returned array to access the form component and methods. The table listing the available form methods is a helpful reference for users to understand the capabilities of the form API.


242-373: Comprehensive documentation of form component props.

The props section provides a comprehensive list of available props for configuring the form component. The table is well-structured, including the prop names, descriptions, types, and default values. The inclusion of TypeScript type definitions for ActionButtonOptions, FormCommonConfig, and FormSchema is a helpful reference for users to understand the structure and expected properties of the related configurations.


375-444: Detailed explanation of form linking and validation.

The form linking section provides a clear explanation of how to define dependencies between fields and control their behavior based on the values of other fields using the dependencies property in the schema. The form validation section covers two approaches for defining validation rules: using strings for simple rules and using Zod schemas for more complex validations. The examples are helpful for users to understand how to implement form linking and validation in their schemas.

docs/.vitepress/theme/components/site-layout.vue (1)

84-86: Verify that ConfigProvider correctly applies the theme

You're passing tokenTheme to ConfigProvider:

<ConfigProvider :theme="tokenTheme">
  <Layout />
</ConfigProvider>

Ensure that the algorithm property within tokenTheme is structured correctly according to ant-design-vue's expectations. The theme prop should be an object with the algorithm property being a function or an array of functions provided by ant-design-vue.

To confirm that the theming works as intended, you can run your application and observe if the theme switches correctly between dark and light modes. Additionally, consult the ant-design-vue documentation to ensure you're using the ConfigProvider component properly.

docs/src/demos/vben-form/api/index.vue (2)

58-62: onSubmit function implementation looks good

The onSubmit function correctly handles form submissions and displays the form values as a success message.


64-206: handleClick function handles actions appropriately

The handleClick function effectively manages form state updates based on the action provided. All cases in the switch statement are handled correctly.

packages/@core/base/shared/src/utils/inference.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-api.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/.vitepress/theme/components/site-layout.vue Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/demos/vben-form/dynamic/index.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/demos/vben-form/dynamic/index.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/demos/vben-form/dynamic/index.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/demos/vben-form/api/index.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/demos/vben-form/api/index.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/.vitepress/theme/components/site-layout.vue (1)

74-83: LGTM, but consider removing the commented-out token property.

The computed property tokenTheme correctly determines the theme algorithm based on the current dark mode state.

However, the token property is commented out:

// token: tokens,

If this property is no longer needed, consider removing it to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c0c5cd and 160d25f.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (3)
  • docs/.vitepress/components/demo-preview.vue (1 hunks)
  • docs/.vitepress/theme/components/site-layout.vue (1 hunks)
  • pnpm-workspace.yaml (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
docs/.vitepress/components/demo-preview.vue (1)

27-36: LGTM! The introduction of <ClientOnly> is a good improvement.

Wrapping the slot content and the error message within the <ClientOnly> component ensures that they are rendered only on the client-side. This change can potentially improve the handling of server-side rendering scenarios and enhance the overall performance and compatibility of the component.

The control flow and conditional rendering logic remain intact, preserving the existing functionality.

Great work on this enhancement!

docs/.vitepress/theme/components/site-layout.vue (3)

2-9: LGTM!

The additional imports are valid and likely used in the new code segments.


28-28: Initialize isDark to the actual current theme state.

Currently, isDark is initialized to true:

const isDark = ref(true);

This might not reflect the actual theme when the component is mounted. Consider initializing it based on the current state of the document to ensure consistency:

const isDark = ref(document.documentElement.classList.contains('dark'));

This ensures that the theme is correctly set when the component is first rendered.


43-72: Simplify dark mode detection using existing utilities.

You've implemented a custom watchDarkModeChange function with a MutationObserver to detect dark mode changes. While this works, you can simplify your code by using existing utilities like the useDark and useToggle composables from @vueuse/core.

Using these composables can reduce code complexity and improve readability.

Here's how you can refactor the code:

  1. Install @vueuse/core if not already installed:
npm install @vueuse/core
  1. Import and use the composables:
import { useDark } from '@vueuse/core';

const isDark = useDark({
  selector: 'html',
  attribute: 'class',
  valueDark: 'dark',
  valueLight: '',
});

This eliminates the need for the watchDarkModeChange function and automatically keeps isDark in sync with the dark class on the html element.


Translate comments to maintain consistency.

The comment on line 43 is in Chinese:

// 使用该函数

For consistency and to aid all contributors, consider translating the comment to English:

// Use this function
pnpm-workspace.yaml (6)

27-27: LGTM!

The minor version update for @intlify/core-base looks good. It should introduce new features and bug fixes while maintaining backward compatibility.


56-57: LGTM!

The patch version updates for @vue/reactivity and @vue/shared look good. They should introduce bug fixes and performance improvements while maintaining backward compatibility.


109-109: LGTM!

The patch version update for jsdom looks good. It should introduce bug fixes and performance improvements while maintaining backward compatibility.


142-142: LGTM!

The patch version update for stylelint-config-recess-order looks good. It should introduce bug fixes and performance improvements while maintaining backward compatibility.


169-169: LGTM!

The patch version update for vue looks good. It should introduce bug fixes and performance improvements while maintaining backward compatibility.


171-171: LGTM!

The minor version update for vue-i18n looks good. It should introduce new features and bug fixes while maintaining backward compatibility.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 160d25f and 66e76a3.

Files selected for processing (9)
  • apps/web-antd/src/adapter/form.ts (4 hunks)
  • apps/web-ele/src/adapter/form.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web-naive/src/adapter/form.ts (1 hunks)
  • docs/.vitepress/config/zh.mts (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/_env/adapter/form.ts (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/common-ui/vben-form.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/@core/base/shared/src/utils/inference.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-api.ts (1 hunks)
  • playground/src/adapter/form.ts (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
  • apps/web-antd/src/adapter/form.ts
  • docs/src/_env/adapter/form.ts
  • packages/@core/base/shared/src/utils/inference.ts
  • packages/@core/ui-kit/form-ui/src/form-api.ts
  • playground/src/adapter/form.ts
Additional comments not posted (18)
apps/web-ele/src/adapter/form.ts (1)

76-79: LGTM!

The updated condition in the required validation rule improves the readability and clarity of the code by explicitly listing the conditions that trigger the required validation message. The change does not introduce any logical errors or bugs and enhances the maintainability of the code.

apps/web-naive/src/adapter/form.ts (1)

85-88: LGTM! The change clarifies the required validation logic.

The updated condition explicitly checks for undefined, null, or a length of 0, ensuring that only these specific cases trigger the required validation message. This change aligns with the intent described in the AI-generated summary and reduces potential confusion by excluding values like 0 or false from triggering the validation.

The change enhances the clarity and predictability of the required validation rule.

docs/.vitepress/config/zh.mts (3)

157-157: LGTM!

The text label update is consistent with the other changes and does not introduce any issues.


161-161: LGTM!

The text label update is consistent with the other changes and does not introduce any issues.


165-166: LGTM!

The text label update is consistent with the other changes and does not introduce any issues.

docs/src/components/common-ui/vben-form.md (13)

7-7: LGTM!

The statement clearly communicates the adaptability of the form component to various UI frameworks.


9-9: LGTM!

The tip provides clear guidance to users on where to find parameter explanations if not found in the documentation.


11-15: LGTM!

The info block effectively communicates the flexibility and freedom users have in choosing components based on their requirements.


17-24: LGTM!

The new section on adapters provides valuable insights into the form's validation and adaptability. The guidance on customizing adapters empowers users to tailor the form to their specific requirements.


25-157: LGTM!

The Ant Design Vue adapter example is comprehensive and well-structured. It demonstrates best practices for integrating the form with a specific UI framework. The custom validation rules with internationalization support enhance the form's usability.


159-169: LGTM!

The basic usage example provides a clear starting point for users to create a form using the useVbenForm hook. The tip effectively communicates potential issues in the examples that can be ignored.


171-175: LGTM!

The new section on query forms provides a clear explanation of their purpose and behavior. It effectively distinguishes query forms from regular forms.


177-181: LGTM!

The new section on form validation emphasizes its importance and informs users about configuring validation using the rules property.


183-189: LGTM!

The new section on form linking provides valuable information on configuring form linking using the dependencies property. The emphasis on specifying triggerFields helps users ensure correct form linking behavior.


191-195: LGTM!

The new section on custom components informs users about the flexibility to create and integrate their own components into the form. It provides a solution for scenarios where the component library lacks a required component.


197-201: LGTM!

The new section on form operations informs users that examples of common form operations will be provided, setting the expectation for users to learn about them.


203-241: LGTM!

The API documentation for the useVbenForm hook provides a clear explanation of its return values. The code example helps users understand how to use the form component and methods, while the table of form methods serves as a quick reference for available methods and their types.


242-444: LGTM!

The Props documentation for the useVbenForm hook provides a comprehensive reference for the available properties. The table of properties helps users understand the purpose, type, and default value of each property. The TypeScript type definitions provide clarity on the structure and expected properties of the configurations.

The explanations of form linking and validation offer detailed guidance on configuring these features. The support for both string-based rules and Zod schemas offers flexibility in defining validation rules.

docs/.vitepress/config/zh.mts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant