Feature/meta/save metadata #2621
Conversation
Deploying vald with
|
| Latest commit: |
809b712
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://c363a7ba.vald.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://feature-meta-save-metadata.vald.pages.dev |
WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new metadata management feature within the API, including the addition of a Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.
|
github-actions
bot
added
area/manager/index
area/filter/ingress
area/filter/egress
area/agent/sidecar
area/gateway/lb
area/gateway/filter
area/gateway/mirror
area/index/job/correction
area/index/job/creation
area/index/job/save
area/index/job/readreplica
size/XXL
type/feature
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (8)
apis/grpc/v1/agent/sidecar/sidecar_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.json.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.json.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/rpc/errdetails/error_details.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.gorust/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (13)
- apis/docs/v1/docs.md (4 hunks)
- apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto (1 hunks)
- apis/proto/v1/payload/payload.proto (2 hunks)
- apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json (1 hunks)
- rust/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/main.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/meta.v1.tonic.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/payload.v1.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler.rs
Additional context used
buf
apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto
21-21: import "google/api/annotations.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
checkov
apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security requirement defined in securityDefinitions - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_6)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that securityDefinitions is defined and not empty - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_1)
Markdownlint
apis/docs/v1/docs.md
688-688: null
Link fragments should be valid(MD051, link-fragments)
Additional comments not posted (20)
rust/Cargo.toml (1)
20-20: LGTM!The change looks good. Adding a new member entry
"bin/meta"to thememberslist in theCargo.tomlfile is the correct way to include a new binary target or module in a Rust project. This change is consistent with the PR objective of introducing a new metadata management feature.rust/libs/proto/Cargo.toml (1)
26-26: LGTM! The new dependency enhances functionality while maintaining compatibility.Adding the
prost-typesdependency with version0.13.2is a beneficial change that extends the project's capabilities by incorporating additional types provided by theprostlibrary. This change aligns well with the existing setup, as the version is compatible with the already usedprostdependency at0.13.1.The new dependency is unlikely to introduce any breaking changes or issues, as it only expands the available types without modifying the core functionality of the project. This change should enhance the overall functionality and organization of the project, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
rust/bin/meta/Cargo.toml (1)
1-24: LGTM!The Cargo configuration for the
metabinary looks good:
- The package name, version, and edition are set appropriately.
- The dependencies are relevant and their versions are specified:
protocrate with a local path dependency for protocol buffer definitions.tokiocrate with the "full" feature set for async runtime.toniccrate for building gRPC services.The configuration aligns with the binary's purpose of handling metadata operations and interacting with gRPC using the Tonic framework and Tokio runtime.
rust/libs/proto/src/lib.rs (1)
40-44: LGTM!The addition of the
metamodule and its submodulev1follows the existing pattern in the file and is consistent with the overall structure and style. The changes do not alter any existing logic but add new capabilities for future development, which is a good practice for maintainability and extensibility.rust/bin/meta/src/main.rs (1)
1-30: LGTM!The code follows a standard structure for setting up a gRPC server in Rust using the
toniclibrary. It imports the necessary modules, creates an instance of theMetaservice, registers it with the server, and starts serving requests on the specified address.The error handling is done using
ResultandBox<dyn std::error::Error>, which is a common pattern in Rust for propagating errors.Overall, the code looks clean, well-organized, and adheres to best practices.
rust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs (1)
1-40: LGTM! The code structure and organization follow the best practices.The implementation of the
Metaservice follows the standard practices for implementing a gRPC service in Rust using thetonicframework. The code is well-organized and adheres to the provided license header format. The use oftonic::Requestandtonic::Responsetypes ensures proper handling of gRPC requests and responses.apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto (2)
30-45: LGTM!The
Metaservice and itsGet,Set, andDeletemethods are well-defined, following the Protocol Buffers style guide and best practices. Thegoogle.api.httpannotations for HTTP/REST mapping are also correctly specified for each method.
22-22: LGTM!The import for
v1/payload/payload.protois correct, assuming the file exists at the specified path relative to this proto file.apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json (2)
1-167: The overall structure and organization of the Swagger spec looks good!The spec follows the Swagger 2.0 format with properly defined top-level fields for
swagger,info,tags,consumes,produces,paths, anddefinitions. Thepathssection clearly defines the API endpoints and their request/response details, while thedefinitionssection properly defines the message types used in the API.Tools
checkov
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security requirement defined in securityDefinitions - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_6)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that securityDefinitions is defined and not empty - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_1)
14-99: The API endpoints for metadata management are well-defined.The
pathssection correctly defines the following endpoints for theMetaservice:
POST /meta: For setting metadata using theMetaKeyValuemessage type in the request body.GET /meta/{key}: For retrieving metadata value using thekeypath parameter.DELETE /meta/{key}: For deleting metadata using thekeypath parameter.The request/response message types are appropriately used for each endpoint, and the path parameters are correctly defined for the
GetandDeleteendpoints.rust/libs/proto/src/meta.v1.tonic.rs (2)
16-171: LGTM!The
meta_clientmodule provides a clean and modular implementation of a gRPC client for theMetaservice. The use of thetoniclibrary simplifies the gRPC communication and provides a consistent API for making requests. The module follows Rust's naming conventions and uses appropriate visibility modifiers for the struct and its methods. The module also provides methods for configuring the client, such as setting compression and message size limits, which is a good practice for flexibility and performance tuning.
173-456: LGTM!The
meta_servermodule provides a clean and modular implementation of a gRPC server for theMetaservice. The use of thetoniclibrary simplifies the gRPC communication and provides a consistent API for handling requests. The module follows Rust's naming conventions and uses appropriate visibility modifiers for the struct and its methods. The module also provides methods for configuring the server, such as setting compression and message size limits, which is a good practice for flexibility and performance tuning. The use of a trait to specify the server methods is a good practice for abstraction and modularity. The implementations of theService,Clone, andNamedServicetraits are necessary for the server to work with thetoniclibrary.apis/proto/v1/payload/payload.proto (1)
780-793: LGTM! The newMetamessage structure enhances metadata management capabilities.The introduction of the
Metamessage and its nested message types (Key,Value, andKeyValue) expands the schema to accommodate flexible metadata representation. The use ofgoogle.protobuf.Anytype for thevaluefield in theValuemessage allows for storing various data types, providing versatility. TheKeyValuemessage establishes a clear structure for representing key-value pairs, enabling efficient metadata management.These additions enhance the data representation capabilities of the protocol without affecting existing functionality. The changes lay the foundation for improved metadata handling and open up possibilities for future implementations and integrations.
rust/libs/proto/src/payload.v1.rs (4)
1241-1244: LGTM!The empty
Metastruct serves as a placeholder for themetamodule. The changes look good.
1247-1252: LGTM!The
Keystruct is correctly defined with a single string fieldkey. The changes look good.
1253-1258: LGTM!The
Valuestruct is correctly defined with an optional field of typeAny. This allows for flexibility in storing different types of values. The changes look good.
1259-1266: LGTM!The
KeyValuestruct is correctly defined with two optional fields:keyof typeKeyandvalueof typeValue. This allows for pairing keys and values. The changes look good.apis/docs/v1/docs.md (3)
53-56: LGTM!The addition of the
Metaservice to the table of contents is consistent with the existing entries.
123-124: LGTM!The addition of the
v1/meta/meta.protofile entry is consistent with the existing entries.
1346-1361: LGTM!The addition of the
Metaservice RPC method documentation (Get,Set,Delete) follows the existing format and is clear.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
rust/bin/meta/Cargo.toml (1)
21-24: The dependencies are correctly specified, but consider optimizing thetokiofeatures if possible.The dependencies section is correctly formatted and includes the necessary information for each dependency. The use of a local
protodependency suggests a project-specific library, which is fine.However, the
tokiodependency enables the "full" feature set. If the package doesn't require all the features, consider specifying only the necessary features to reduce the dependency footprint. For example:tokio = { version = "1.40.0", features = ["rt", "macros"] }This would enable only the runtime and macros features of
tokio.The
tonicdependency is a gRPC framework for Rust, which aligns with the package name "meta" suggesting metadata-related functionality.rust/bin/meta/src/main.rs (1)
19-30: The main function looks good with a few suggestions.
- Consider making the listening address configurable using command-line arguments or environment variables instead of hardcoding it.
- Ensure that the
handler::Metatype correctly implements the service handler for theMetaServerand handles all the required gRPC methods.- Consider adding logging statements to help with debugging and monitoring.
Here's an example of how you can make the listening address configurable using the
clapcrate for command-line argument parsing:use clap::Parser; #[derive(Parser)] struct Args { #[clap(long, default_value = "[::1]:8081")] addr: String, } #[tokio::main] async fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> { let args = Args::parse(); let addr = args.addr.parse()?; // ... }This allows the user to specify the listening address using the
--addrflag when running the server.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (8)
apis/grpc/v1/agent/sidecar/sidecar_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.json.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.json.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/rpc/errdetails/error_details.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.gorust/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (13)
- apis/docs/v1/docs.md (4 hunks)
- apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto (1 hunks)
- apis/proto/v1/payload/payload.proto (2 hunks)
- apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json (1 hunks)
- rust/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/main.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/meta.v1.tonic.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/payload.v1.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler.rs
Additional context used
buf
apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto
21-21: import "google/api/annotations.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
checkov
apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security requirement defined in securityDefinitions - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_6)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that securityDefinitions is defined and not empty - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_1)
Markdownlint
apis/docs/v1/docs.md
688-688: null
Link fragments should be valid(MD051, link-fragments)
Additional comments not posted (19)
rust/Cargo.toml (1)
20-20: LGTM!The addition of the
"bin/meta"entry to thememberslist in the[workspace]section is a valid way to include a new binary target in the Rust project. The change follows the correct syntax and aligns with the purpose mentioned in the AI-generated summary.rust/libs/proto/Cargo.toml (1)
26-26: LGTM!The addition of the
prost-typesdependency with version "0.13.2" is a valid and consistent change in the context of this Rust project'sCargo.tomlfile. It aligns with the existing dependencies related to protocol buffers, such asprostandtonic, and the specified version is in line with the versions of those dependencies.This change suggests an enhancement in the project's capabilities related to handling Protocol Buffers, potentially supporting additional features or types. The focused nature of the change and its consistency with the existing dependencies indicate that it is a reasonable and appropriate modification.
rust/bin/meta/Cargo.toml (2)
1-15: The license header looks good!The license header is correctly formatted and includes the necessary information such as the copyright notice and the reference to the Apache License, Version 2.0.
16-19: The package metadata is correctly defined.The package metadata section is correctly formatted and includes the necessary information such as the package name, version, and edition.
rust/libs/proto/src/lib.rs (1)
40-44: LGTM!The addition of the
metamodule and its submodulev1follows the existing pattern in the library and aligns with the PR objective of introducing metadata-related functionality. The code segment itself looks good and does not require any further changes.rust/bin/meta/src/main.rs (2)
1-16: LGTM!The Apache License 2.0 header is correctly added to the file.
17-17: LGTM!The
handlermodule is correctly imported using themodkeyword.apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto (2)
1-45: LGTM!The proto file follows the standard structure and syntax. The
Metaservice and its methods are defined correctly with appropriate request and response types. Thegoogle.api.httpoptions are used correctly to define the HTTP endpoints for the gRPC methods.Apart from the import issue flagged by the static analysis tool, the rest of the file looks good to me.
Tools
buf
21-21: import "google/api/annotations.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
21-21: Verify the import and fix the compilation error.The static analysis tool has flagged that the import
google/api/annotations.protodoes not exist, which is causing a compilation error.Please verify if the import path is correct and the file exists in the specified location. If the file is missing, you may need to install the
googleapispackage or update the import path to the correct location.Do you want me to help you resolve this issue or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
buf
21-21: import "google/api/annotations.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
rust/libs/proto/src/meta.v1.tonic.rs (2)
16-171: LGTM!The
meta_clientmodule is well-structured and follows the standard pattern for defining a gRPC client using thetoniclibrary. The code is readable, and the async methods for each RPC endpoint are implemented correctly.
173-456: LGTM!The
meta_servermodule is well-structured and follows the standard pattern for defining a gRPC server using thetoniclibrary. The code is readable, and the server implementation correctly handles incoming requests and dispatches them to the appropriate async methods defined in theMetatrait.apis/proto/v1/payload/payload.proto (1)
780-793: LGTM!The
Metamessage and its nested messages (Key,Value, andKeyValue) are well-structured and provide a flexible way to store metadata using a key-value format. The use ofgoogle.protobuf.Anyfor thevaluefield allows for storing values of any type, enhancing the versatility of the metadata storage.The changes are self-contained within the
Metamessage and do not impact other parts of the file. The code follows the protobuf syntax and best practices.rust/libs/proto/src/payload.v1.rs (4)
1243-1244: LGTM!The
Metastruct is an empty placeholder, which is fine.
1249-1252: Looks good!The
Keystruct with a singlekeyfield of typeStringis well-defined and serves a clear purpose.
1255-1258: Looks good!The
Valuestruct with an optionalvaluefield of typeAnyprovides flexibility to represent values of any type. The struct is well-defined.
1261-1266: Looks good!The
KeyValuestruct appropriately combines theKeyandValuestructs to represent a key-value pair. The optional fields provide flexibility. The struct is well-defined.apis/docs/v1/docs.md (3)
53-56: LGTM!The table of contents entries for the new
Metamessage types are correctly added.
661-689: Great job documenting the new Meta functionality!The
Metaservice and related message types are thoroughly documented with clear descriptions of their purpose and fields. This will greatly help users understand and utilize the new functionality.Tools
Markdownlint
688-688: null
Link fragments should be valid(MD051, link-fragments)
1346-1361: Excellent documentation of the Meta service methods!The
Get,Set, andDeletemethods of theMetaservice are well-documented, including their request and response types. This documentation will assist developers in understanding and utilizing these methods effectively.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
rust/bin/meta/Cargo.toml (1)
1-24: LGTM!The Cargo.toml file for the "meta" package is well-structured and includes the necessary package metadata and dependencies. The use of the 2021 edition of Rust is a good choice for a new package. The dependencies on "proto", "tokio", and "tonic" are properly specified with their respective versions.
The inclusion of the Apache License header is appreciated, as it clearly communicates the licensing terms of the code.
A few suggestions for further improvement:
- Consider adding a brief description of the package in the
[package]section to provide more context about its purpose.- If there are any specific features or configuration options for the dependencies that are relevant to this package, consider specifying them explicitly.
- As the package evolves, make sure to update the version number appropriately to reflect the changes.
Overall, the Cargo.toml file looks good and is ready to be merged.
rust/bin/meta/src/main.rs (1)
19-30: Consider using configuration for server address and proper initialization of theMetahandler.
Instead of hardcoding the server address and port, consider using a configuration mechanism (e.g., environment variables, configuration files) to specify them. This will make it easier to change the server's listening address without modifying the code.
The
Metahandler is created using thedefaultmethod. If the handler requires any specific configurations or dependencies, make sure to initialize it properly before passing it to theMetaServer. This will ensure that the handler is set up correctly and can function as expected.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (8)
apis/grpc/v1/agent/sidecar/sidecar_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.json.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.json.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/rpc/errdetails/error_details.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.gorust/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (13)
- apis/docs/v1/docs.md (4 hunks)
- apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto (1 hunks)
- apis/proto/v1/payload/payload.proto (2 hunks)
- apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json (1 hunks)
- rust/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/main.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/meta.v1.tonic.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/payload.v1.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler.rs
Additional context used
buf
apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto
21-21: import "google/api/annotations.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
checkov
apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security requirement defined in securityDefinitions - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_6)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that securityDefinitions is defined and not empty - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_1)
Markdownlint
apis/docs/v1/docs.md
688-688: null
Link fragments should be valid(MD051, link-fragments)
Additional comments not posted (15)
rust/Cargo.toml (1)
20-20: LGTM!The addition of the new
"bin/meta"member to theCargo.tomlfile is valid and suggests the integration of a new binary target related to metadata handling. This change expands the project's functionality and aligns with the overall objective of introducing a metadata management feature.rust/libs/proto/Cargo.toml (1)
26-26: LGTM!The addition of the
prost-typesdependency with version0.13.2is consistent with the existing dependencies and aligns well with the project's use of Protocol Buffers. The change is small, focused, and does not introduce any apparent issues.rust/libs/proto/src/lib.rs (1)
40-44: LGTM!The addition of the
metamodule and its submodulev1is a clear and well-structured approach to introduce metadata-related functionality. The inclusion of themeta.v1.tonic.rsfile aligns with the overall project structure and conventions. The changes follow the existing coding style and conventions used in the file.apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto (1)
1-45: The metadata service definition looks good overall!The gRPC service definition for metadata management follows the standard proto3 syntax and includes the necessary RPCs (Get, Set, Delete) with appropriate request/response message types. The HTTP annotations for REST endpoints are a nice touch for interoperability.
The license header and package/option declarations are in order as well.
Tools
buf
21-21: import "google/api/annotations.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json (1)
1-167: The API design and structure look good!The Swagger specification follows best practices for RESTful API design, including:
- Appropriate use of HTTP methods for different operations
- Well-defined request and response models
- Consistent error handling using the
rpcStatusmodelGreat job on structuring the API in a clear and logical manner!
Tools
checkov
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security requirement defined in securityDefinitions - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_6)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that securityDefinitions is defined and not empty - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_1)
rust/libs/proto/src/meta.v1.tonic.rs (3)
16-171: LGTM!The
MetaClientstruct and its associated methods are correctly implemented following thetonicframework conventions. The code is well-structured, follows best practices, and provides flexibility through the use of generics and configuration methods. The gRPC service methods (get,set, anddelete) are defined with appropriate request and response types.
176-202: LGTM!The
Metatrait correctly defines the gRPC service methods using theasync_traitmacro. The method signatures are consistent and use the appropriate request and response types from thepayload::v1::metamodule. The use oftonic::Requestandtonic::Responsealigns with thetonicframework conventions, and thestd::result::Resultreturn type allows for proper error handling.
203-455: LGTM!The
MetaServerstruct and its associated methods are correctly implemented following thetonicframework conventions. The code is well-structured, follows best practices, and provides flexibility through the use of generics and configuration methods. TheServicetrait implementation correctly matches the incoming request paths and dispatches them to the corresponding service methods using generatedUnaryServiceimplementations. The code handles unimplemented methods and provides appropriate error responses.apis/proto/v1/payload/payload.proto (1)
780-793: LGTM!The
Metamessage type and its nested message types (Key,Value, andKeyValue) are correctly defined. The use ofgoogle.protobuf.Anyin theValuemessage enables flexible and dynamic data representations, while theKeyValuemessage establishes a key-value pair structure. This addition enhances the data modeling capabilities of the protocol without altering existing functionality.rust/libs/proto/src/payload.v1.rs (4)
1243-1244: LGTM!The
Metastruct is an empty placeholder, which is fine.
1249-1252: LGTM!The
Keystruct with a singlekeyfield of typeStringis well-defined.
1255-1258: LGTM!The
Valuestruct with an optionalvaluefield of typeAnyprovides flexibility in representing different types of values. The usage ofprost_types::Anyis appropriate here.
1261-1266: LGTM!The
KeyValuestruct effectively combines theKeyandValuestructs as optional fields, allowing for flexible representation of key-value pairs. The struct definition is clear and concise.apis/docs/v1/docs.md (2)
53-56: LGTM!The added documentation for the
Metastructure and its associated types (Meta.Key,Meta.KeyValue, andMeta.Value) provides a clear and comprehensive overview of the new functionality. This will help users understand and utilize theMetafeatures effectively.
1346-1361: LGTM!The added documentation for the
Metaservice and its methods (Get,Set, andDelete) is clear and concise. It accurately describes the purpose of each method and specifies the request and response types, making it easy for users to understand and interact with theMetaservice.
apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto
Outdated
|
|
||
| package meta.v1; | ||
|
|
||
| import "google/api/annotations.proto"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the missing import for google/api/annotations.proto.
The import statement for google/api/annotations.proto is causing a compilation error as reported by the static analysis tool, since the file does not exist in the specified location.
To resolve this, ensure that you have the google/api/annotations.proto file available in your project's proto include path. You can achieve this by one of the following methods:
- If using
bufas the build tool, add the following to yourbuf.yaml:
deps:
- buf.build/googleapis/googleapisThen run buf mod update to fetch the dependency.
- If using
protocdirectly, install thegoogleapisproto files to your system's proto include path, e.g.,/usr/local/include.
You can find the googleapis proto files at https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis.
Let me know if you need any assistance with resolving this import issue.
Tools
buf
21-21: import "google/api/annotations.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
smorihira
force-pushed
the
feature/meta/save-metadata
branch
from
7440bc1 to
8181c42
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto (1)
1-29: Add package-level documentation.It's a good practice to include package-level documentation that provides an overview of the service and its purpose. Consider adding comments to describe the functionality and usage of the
Metaservice.Tools
buf
21-21: import "google/api/annotations.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (8)
apis/grpc/v1/agent/sidecar/sidecar_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.json.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.json.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/rpc/errdetails/error_details.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.gorust/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (13)
- apis/docs/v1/docs.md (4 hunks)
- apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto (1 hunks)
- apis/proto/v1/payload/payload.proto (2 hunks)
- apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json (1 hunks)
- rust/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/bin/meta/src/main.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/meta.v1.tonic.rs (1 hunks)
- rust/libs/proto/src/payload.v1.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- rust/libs/proto/src/lib.rs
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- apis/proto/v1/payload/payload.proto
- rust/Cargo.toml
- rust/bin/meta/Cargo.toml
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler.rs
- rust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs
- rust/bin/meta/src/main.rs
- rust/libs/proto/Cargo.toml
- rust/libs/proto/src/payload.v1.rs
Additional context used
buf
apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.proto
21-21: import "google/api/annotations.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
checkov
apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security requirement defined in securityDefinitions - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_6)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that securityDefinitions is defined and not empty - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_1)
Markdownlint
apis/docs/v1/docs.md
688-688: null
Link fragments should be valid(MD051, link-fragments)
Additional comments not posted (12)
apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.json (1)
1-167: Address the security issues flagged by static analysis.The static analysis hints and past review comments suggest that the API lacks important security definitions and rules. To ensure proper authentication and authorization, consider the following:
- Define security schemes in the
securityDefinitionssection (e.g., API keys, OAuth 2.0)- Specify security requirements for each API operation using the
securityfield- Implement global security rules that apply to all API operations
Here's an example of how to define security schemes and requirements in the Swagger specification:
{ "swagger": "2.0", "info": { "title": "v1/meta/meta.proto", "version": "version not set" }, + "securityDefinitions": { + "api_key": { + "type": "apiKey", + "name": "api_key", + "in": "header" + }, + "oauth2": { + "type": "oauth2", + "flow": "accessCode", + "authorizationUrl": "https://example.com/oauth/authorize", + "tokenUrl": "https://example.com/oauth/token", + "scopes": { + "read:meta": "Read metadata", + "write:meta": "Write metadata" + } + } + }, "paths": { "/meta": { "post": { "operationId": "Meta_Set", + "security": [ + { + "oauth2": [ + "write:meta" + ] + }, + { + "api_key": [] + } + ], ... } }, "/meta/{key}": { "get": { "operationId": "Meta_Get", + "security": [ + { + "oauth2": [ + "read:meta" + ] + }, + { + "api_key": [] + } + ], ... }, "delete": { "operationId": "Meta_Delete", + "security": [ + { + "oauth2": [ + "write:meta" + ] + }, + { + "api_key": [] + } + ], ... } } }, + "security": [ + { + "api_key": [] + } + ], ... }Do you want me to provide more details on how to implement the security schemes and handle authentication/authorization in your API? I'd be happy to assist you further in addressing these security concerns.
Tools
checkov
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security requirement defined in securityDefinitions - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_6)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[HIGH] 1-167: Ensure that securityDefinitions is defined and not empty - version 2.0 files
(CKV_OPENAPI_1)
rust/libs/proto/src/meta.v1.tonic.rs (5)
1-15: LGTM!The copyright notice and license header are properly formatted and include the correct information.
16-171: LGTM!The
MetaClientimplementation is well-structured and follows the best practices for generating gRPC client code using thetoniclibrary. The code includes necessary methods for creating a client, configuring compression, setting message size limits, and defining the gRPC methods for interacting with the metadata. No issues or improvements needed.
173-202: LGTM!The
Metatrait correctly defines the gRPC methods that should be implemented by the server. The method signatures are properly defined, taking the appropriate request types and returning the expected response types. No issues or improvements needed.
203-440: LGTM!The
MetaServerimplementation is well-structured and follows the best practices for generating gRPC server code using thetoniclibrary. The code includes the necessary methods for creating a server, configuring compression, setting message size limits, and handling gRPC requests. Thecallmethod correctly dispatches the incoming requests to the appropriate gRPC method handlers based on the request path. No issues or improvements needed.
441-456: LGTM!The
Clonetrait implementation for theMetaServerstruct is correctly implemented, allowing the creation of a new instance by cloning the inner state and configuration. TheNamedServicetrait implementation provides the expected service name for identifying the gRPC service. No issues or improvements needed.apis/docs/v1/docs.md (6)
661-689: The past review comment is still applicable. Please address the broken link fragment.The documentation for the
Meta.Valuefield contains an invalid link fragment that needs to be fixed or removed.Tools
Markdownlint
688-688: null
Link fragments should be valid(MD051, link-fragments)
53-56: The newMetasection looks good!The section provides a clear and concise introduction to the new metadata-related message types being added to the documentation.
667-671:Meta.Keymessage type looks good.It has a simple and clear definition for representing metadata keys using a
stringfield.
675-680:Meta.KeyValuemessage type looks good.It properly combines the
Meta.KeyandMeta.Valuetypes to represent a key-value pair for metadata.
684-688:Meta.Valuemessage type looks good.Using the
google.protobuf.Anytype for thevaluefield provides flexibility in representing metadata values of different types.Tools
Markdownlint
688-688: null
Link fragments should be valid(MD051, link-fragments)
1352-1361: TheMetaservice and its RPCs look good!The service provides a complete set of operations for managing metadata:
Getfor retrieving metadata values.Setfor setting metadata key-value pairs.Deletefor deleting metadata entries.The request and response types for each RPC are well-defined using the appropriate message types.
kpango
force-pushed
the
feature/meta/save-metadata
branch
from
8181c42 to
2e47043
Compare
kpango
force-pushed
the
feature/meta/save-metadata
branch
from
809b712 to
5ba1375
Compare
Description
Related Issue
Versions
Checklist
Special notes for your reviewer
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Metafunctionality within the API for managing metadata, including methods forGet,Set, andDelete.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores