Backport PR #2639 to release/v1.7 for Refctor for release v1.7.14 #2648
Conversation
Signed-off-by: kpango <kpango@vdaas.org>
Deploying vald with
|
| Latest commit: |
a76f96c
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://fd2abaf8.vald.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://backport-release-v1-7-refact-aikq.vald.pages.dev |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces extensive changes across multiple files, focusing on enhancing the Vald project's functionality and organization. Key updates include the addition of new files for API definitions and Rust integration, modifications to existing workflows, updates to documentation and configuration files, and improvements in deployment orchestration. The changes reflect a comprehensive restructuring aimed at improving usability, configurability, and monitoring capabilities within the project. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ If you are interested, please refer to [SDKs](../user-guides/sdks.md).<br> | |||
| ```go | |||
| ctx := context.Background() | |||
|
|
|||
| conn, err := grpc.DialContext(ctx, grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithInsecure()) | |||
| conn, err := grpc.NewClient(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithInsecure()) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[LanguageTool] reported by reviewdog 🐶
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter. (UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START)
Suggestions: Conn
URL: https://languagetool.org/insights/post/spelling-capital-letters/
Rule: https://community.languagetool.org/rule/show/UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START?lang=en-US
Category: CASING
| @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ If you are interested, please refer to [SDKs](../user-guides/sdks.md).<br> | |||
| ```go | |||
| ctx := context.Background() | |||
|
|
|||
| conn, err := grpc.DialContext(ctx, grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials())) | |||
| conn, err := grpc.NewClient(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials())) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[LanguageTool] reported by reviewdog 🐶
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter. (UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START)
Suggestions: Conn
URL: https://languagetool.org/insights/post/spelling-capital-letters/
Rule: https://community.languagetool.org/rule/show/UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START?lang=en-US
Category: CASING
| @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ This chapter uses [NGT](https://github.com/yahoojapan/ngt) as Vald Agent to perf | |||
| ```go | |||
| ctx := context.Background() | |||
|
|
|||
| conn, err := grpc.DialContext(ctx, grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials())) | |||
| conn, err := grpc.NewClient(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials())) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[LanguageTool] reported by reviewdog 🐶
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter. (UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START)
Suggestions: Conn
URL: https://languagetool.org/insights/post/spelling-capital-letters/
Rule: https://community.languagetool.org/rule/show/UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START?lang=en-US
Category: CASING
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (62)
versions/CHAOS_MESH_VERSION (1)
Inconsistent Chaos Mesh version references detected
- The
CHAOS_MESH_VERSIONhas been updated to 2.7.0, but related configuration files liketests/chaos/chart/Chart.yamlstill reference AppVersion: 1.0.0 andversion: 1.0.0.- Ensure all configuration and documentation files are updated to reflect the new Chaos Mesh version to maintain consistency and prevent potential deployment issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-2: Approve Chaos Mesh version update to 2.7.0The update from version 2.6.4 to 2.7.0 of Chaos Mesh has been noted. This minor version update likely introduces new features or improvements while maintaining backward compatibility.
To ensure this update aligns with the project's objectives and maintains compatibility, please verify the following:
- Has this new version been tested with the current project setup?
- Are there any breaking changes or deprecations in Chaos Mesh 2.7.0 that might affect the project?
- Does this update align with the PR objectives of refactoring for release v1.7.14?
Consider running the following script to check for any mentions of Chaos Mesh in the project documentation or configuration files, which might need updating:
This will help identify any places where the Chaos Mesh version might need to be updated or where its usage is documented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Chaos Mesh references in documentation and configuration files echo "Searching for Chaos Mesh references:" rg --type md --type yaml --type json "Chaos\s*Mesh" -C 2Length of output: 914
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md (1)
28-30: LGTM! Consider adding a comment about version updates.The version updates for Docker, Kubernetes, and Helm are correct and align with the PR objectives. These minor version increments are reasonable and maintain the template's structure.
Consider adding a comment above the Environment section to remind contributors to update these versions when submitting bug reports. For example:
### Environment <!-- Please update the versions below to match your environment -->This addition would help ensure that bug reports always contain the most up-to-date version information.
k8s/metrics/profefe/cronjob.yaml (2)
33-33: Consider the trade-offs of usingimagePullPolicy: AlwaysThe change from
IfNotPresenttoAlwaysfor theimagePullPolicyensures that the latest version of theprofefe/kprofefe:latestimage is always used. This is generally a good practice when using the:latesttag, as it ensures consistency and up-to-date functionality.However, please consider the following trade-offs:
- Increased network usage: The image will be pulled every time the job runs (every 3 minutes), which may impact network performance.
- Potential increase in job startup time: Frequent image pulls might slightly delay job execution.
- Dependency on registry availability: If the registry is unavailable or rate-limited, it could cause job failures.
To mitigate these concerns, you might consider:
- Using a specific version tag instead of
:latestfor better control over updates.- Implementing a rollout strategy for updates to balance freshness and stability.
Line range hint
1-41: Consider optimizing job scheduling and resource managementWhile the current configuration is functional, there are a few areas where it could be optimized:
Scheduling frequency:
The job is currently set to run every 3 minutes (*/3 * * * *). Depending on the specific requirements of your profiling needs, this frequency might be higher than necessary. Consider if a lower frequency (e.g., every 5 or 10 minutes) would still meet your needs while reducing system load and data volume.Resource management:
The configuration doesn't specify any resource requests or limits for the container. To ensure proper resource allocation and prevent potential resource contention, consider adding resource specifications. For example:resources: requests: cpu: 100m memory: 128Mi limits: cpu: 500m memory: 256MiAdjust these values based on the actual resource needs of the
kprofefejob.Error handling:
Consider adding afailureThresholdto the job template to control how many times a job can fail before it's marked as failed. This can help in identifying and addressing persistent issues more quickly.k8s/metrics/pyroscope/base/deployment.yaml (1)
51-51: Approved:imagePullPolicyset toAlwaysis appropriate for:latesttagThe change to set
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysis appropriate, especially when using the:latesttag for the Pyroscope image. This ensures that the most recent version of the image is always pulled, which is beneficial for a metrics collection tool like Pyroscope.Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind using
Alwayswith the:latesttag, to provide context for future maintainers:image: "pyroscope/pyroscope:latest" imagePullPolicy: Always # Ensure we always get the latest version when using the :latest tagAdditionally, for production environments, it's generally recommended to use specific version tags instead of
:latestto ensure reproducibility and stability. You might want to consider this for future updates.internal/net/grpc/codes/codes.go (2)
44-46: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for better documentation.The
CodeTypeinterface is well-defined and allows for flexible use of theToStringfunction with various integer types. This is a good use of Go's generics feature.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this interface:
// CodeType is a type constraint for gRPC status codes, // allowing various integer types and the Code type. type CodeType interface { int | int8 | int32 | int64 | uint | uint8 | uint32 | uint64 | Code }
48-87: LGTM! Consider a minor optimization for better performance.The
ToStringfunction is well-implemented, covering all standard gRPC status codes and providing a good default for unrecognized codes. The use of generics makes it flexible and reusable.Consider using a map for constant-time lookup instead of a switch statement. This can potentially improve performance, especially if this function is called frequently:
var codeToString = map[Code]string{ OK: "OK", Canceled: "Canceled", Unknown: "Unknown", InvalidArgument: "InvalidArgument", DeadlineExceeded: "DeadlineExceeded", NotFound: "NotFound", AlreadyExists: "AlreadyExists", PermissionDenied: "PermissionDenied", ResourceExhausted: "ResourceExhausted", FailedPrecondition: "FailedPrecondition", Aborted: "Aborted", OutOfRange: "OutOfRange", Unimplemented: "Unimplemented", Internal: "Internal", Unavailable: "Unavailable", DataLoss: "DataLoss", Unauthenticated: "Unauthenticated", } func ToString[T CodeType](c T) string { if s, ok := codeToString[Code(c)]; ok { return s } return "InvalidStatus" }This approach would reduce the function's complexity from O(n) to O(1), where n is the number of possible status codes.
dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile (1)
43-44: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for clarity.The addition of the
CARGO_HOMEenvironment variable and its inclusion in thePATHis a good practice. It ensures consistency in the Rust development environment and aligns with the PR objectives.For improved readability, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of these environment variables:
+# Set up Rust environment variables ENV CARGO_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/cargo ENV PATH=${CARGO_HOME}/bin:${RUSTUP_HOME}/bin:/usr/local/bin:${PATH}k8s/metrics/tempo/tempo.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-158: Summary of changes in k8s/metrics/tempo/tempo.yaml
- The
imagePullPolicyfor both 'tempo' and 'tempo-query' containers has been updated to 'Always', which aligns with the PR objectives.- The port name changes mentioned in the AI summary are not visible in the provided code, which requires clarification.
Overall, the changes contribute to ensuring the latest images are used, which can be beneficial for maintaining up-to-date deployments. However, consider the potential impact on deployment time and network usage.
Action items:
- Clarify the discrepancy regarding port name changes.
- Consider monitoring the impact of the
imagePullPolicychange on deployment times and resource usage in your specific environment.internal/net/grpc/interceptor/server/logging/accesslog.go (1)
56-77: LGTM with suggestion: New String() method enhances logging capabilities.The new
String()method significantly improves the logging functionality by providing a detailed and consistent string representation of theAccessLogEntity. It handles errors well, including gRPC status information when available.However, consider the following suggestion for improvement:
Instead of appending the error message to the JSON string, consider including it as a field in the JSON object. This would make parsing the log entries easier and more consistent. Here's a proposed modification:
func (e AccessLogEntity) String() (str string) { var emsg string if e.Error != nil { st, ok := status.FromError(e.Error) if ok && st != nil { emsg = st.String() } else { emsg = e.Error.Error() } + e.ErrorMessage = emsg } eb, err := json.Marshal(e) if err != nil { str = fmt.Sprintf("%#v,\tfailed to json.Marshal(AccessLogEntity) error: %v", e, err) } else { str = string(eb) } - - if emsg != "" { - return str + ",\terror message: " + emsg - } return str }This change would require adding an
ErrorMessagefield to theAccessLogEntitystruct:type AccessLogEntity struct { // ... existing fields ... ErrorMessage string `json:"errorMessage,omitempty" yaml:"errorMessage"` }internal/net/grpc/pool/pool_bench_test.go (2)
132-132: LGTM! Consider adding a TODO for secure credentials in production.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis correct and aligns with the PR objectives. This update follows the recommended practice in the grpc-go documentation.Consider adding a TODO comment to remind developers that
insecure.NewCredentials()should not be used in production code:+ // TODO: Use secure credentials in production environments conn, err := grpc.NewClient(DefaultServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials()))
189-189: LGTM! Consider adding a TODO for consistency.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis correct and consistent with the previous modification. This update aligns with the PR objectives and follows the recommended practice in the grpc-go documentation.For consistency with the previous suggestion, consider adding a TODO comment here as well:
+ // TODO: Use secure credentials in production environments conn, err := grpc.NewClient(DefaultServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials()))k8s/index/job/creation/cronjob.yaml (2)
56-56: Approved: Addition ofimagePullPolicy: Alwaysto wait-for-agent init containerThe addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysensures that the latest version of the init container image is always pulled. This aligns with the PR objectives and can help ensure that the most up-to-date version of the container is used.Consider the trade-offs of using
Alwaysfor theimagePullPolicy:
- Pros: Ensures the latest updates and security patches are applied.
- Cons: May increase startup time and network usage, especially in environments with slower network connections or frequent deployments.
For production environments, you might want to consider using
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresentand updating the image tag when changes are needed, to balance between freshness and performance.
Line range hint
1-168: Summary: Consistent and beneficial changes to init container configurationsThe changes made to this CronJob configuration are consistent and beneficial:
- Both init containers (
wait-for-agentandwait-for-discoverer) now haveimagePullPolicy: Alwaysset.- These changes align with the PR objectives of introducing an
imagePullPolicyconfiguration for initContainers.- The overall structure and functionality of the CronJob remain unchanged, with improvements focused on ensuring the latest init container images are used.
To further improve this configuration:
- Consider adding resource limits and requests for the init containers to ensure they don't consume excessive resources.
- Evaluate if the
busybox:stableimage tag could be pinned to a specific version for better reproducibility, while still maintaining theimagePullPolicy: Alwayssetting.- Review the readiness check logic in the init containers to ensure it's robust and handles potential network issues gracefully.
k8s/index/job/correction/cronjob.yaml (1)
56-56: Approved: Addition ofimagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor thewait-for-agentinit container.This change ensures that the latest version of the
busybox:stableimage is always pulled, which aligns with the PR objective of introducing animagePullPolicyconfiguration for initContainers. It guarantees consistency across all nodes in the cluster.Consider using
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresentinstead ofAlwaysfor thebusybox:stableimage. Since it's a stable tag,IfNotPresentmight be more efficient in terms of startup time and network usage while still ensuring consistency. However, if absolute certainty of using the latest image is required,Alwaysis the correct choice.k8s/metrics/loki/promtail.yaml (2)
43-43: Approved: Image pull policy change enhances consistencyThe change from
IfNotPresenttoAlwaysfor theimagePullPolicyensures that the latest Promtail image (version 1.5.0) is consistently used across all nodes in the cluster. This aligns with the PR's refactoring objectives and helps maintain up-to-date dependencies.Consider the trade-offs for production environments:
- Increased consistency and easier updates.
- Slightly increased network usage and potential for longer deployment times.
For production, you might want to:
- Ensure your CI/CD pipeline updates the specific image tag (e.g., from 1.5.0 to 1.5.1) when new versions are released.
- Monitor for any performance impacts related to image pulling during deployments.
Line range hint
1-224: Consider future improvements for Promtail configurationWhile not directly related to the current change, here are some suggestions for future improvements:
Update Promtail version: The current version (1.5.0) is quite old. Consider upgrading to the latest stable version for improved features and security.
Parameterize cluster name: The
cluster: valdlabel is hardcoded. Consider making this configurable for better flexibility across different environments.Secure Loki URL: The Loki push URL (
http://:@loki.default.svc.cluster.local:3100/loki/api/v1/push) uses empty credentials. Consider implementing proper authentication for increased security.These suggestions can enhance the overall robustness and security of your Promtail setup in future iterations.
docs/user-guides/filtering-configuration.md (2)
156-158: LGTM! Consider adding a note about the updated connection method.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientaligns with the PR objective of replacing the deprecated interface from grpc-go. This update improves the code's compatibility with newer versions of grpc-go.Consider adding a brief note in the text above the code snippet to highlight this change. For example:
// Note: This example uses the updated `grpc.NewClient` method for establishing a connection, which replaces the deprecated `grpc.DialContext`.This addition would help users understand the rationale behind the change and ensure they're using the most up-to-date method.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
156-156: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
157-157: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
158-158: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
156-156: Replace hard tab with spaces for consistent formatting.The static analysis tool detected a hard tab on this line. To ensure consistent formatting across different editors and platforms, it's recommended to use spaces instead of tabs.
Please replace the hard tab with spaces. Most editors can be configured to automatically convert tabs to spaces.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
156-156: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
tests/e2e/performance/max_vector_dim_test.go (2)
156-156: Consider keeping the context declaration closer to its usageMoving the
ctxdeclaration away from its usage might slightly impact code readability. Consider keeping it closer to where it's first used, if possible.
Line range hint
128-185: Overall, the changes improve the code quality and align with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file successfully implement the intended changes, particularly:
- Updating the gRPC client creation method from
DialContexttoNewClient.- Refining error handling for the
SearchByIDoperation.These changes enhance the code's compliance with updated grpc-go guidelines and improve error handling robustness.
To further improve code organization, consider:
- Grouping related operations and their error handling together.
- Adding comments to explain the purpose of critical sections, especially around error handling and retry logic.
tests/e2e/operation/operation.go (4)
Line range hint
153-162: Consider the implications of removing the context parameter.The removal of the
ctx context.Contextparameter from theCreateIndexfunction signature might impact the ability to cancel long-running operations or set timeouts. While this simplifies the API, it could lead to less control over the function's execution.Consider adding an optional timeout parameter or implementing a context-aware version of this function to maintain flexibility:
func (c *client) CreateIndexWithTimeout(t *testing.T, timeout time.Duration) error { ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), timeout) defer cancel() client, err := c.getAgentClient() if err != nil { return err } _, err = client.CreateIndex(ctx, &payload.Control_CreateIndexRequest{ PoolSize: 10000, }) return err }
Line range hint
166-174: Consider the implications of removing the context parameter.Similar to the
CreateIndexfunction, the removal of thectx context.Contextparameter fromSaveIndexmight limit control over the operation's lifecycle.Consider implementing a timeout-aware version of this function:
func (c *client) SaveIndexWithTimeout(t *testing.T, timeout time.Duration) error { ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), timeout) defer cancel() client, err := c.getAgentClient() if err != nil { return err } _, err = client.SaveIndex(ctx, &payload.Empty{}) return err }
199-207: Approved with suggestion: Consider adding timeout control.The changes in
getClientare consistent with the modifications ingetGRPCConnand align with the overall refactoring pattern.To maintain some level of timeout control, consider adding an optional timeout parameter:
func (c *client) getClientWithTimeout(timeout time.Duration) (vald.Client, error) { ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), timeout) defer cancel() conn, err := c.getGRPCConn() if err != nil { return nil, err } return vald.NewValdClient(conn), nil }This would allow callers to set a timeout for the entire client creation process if needed.
Line range hint
208-216: Approved with suggestion: Consider adding timeout control.The changes in
getAgentClientare consistent with the modifications ingetGRPCConnandgetClient, aligning with the overall refactoring pattern.To maintain timeout control, consider adding an optional timeout parameter:
func (c *client) getAgentClientWithTimeout(timeout time.Duration) (core.AgentClient, error) { ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), timeout) defer cancel() conn, err := c.getGRPCConn() if err != nil { return nil, err } return core.NewAgentClient(conn), nil }This would allow callers to set a timeout for the entire agent client creation process if needed.
k8s/manager/index/deployment.yaml (3)
62-62: Approved: Addition of imagePullPolicy for wait-for-agent init containerThe addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor thewait-for-agentinit container aligns with the PR objectives. This ensures that the latest version of the image is always pulled, which can be beneficial for development and testing environments.Consider using a specific image tag instead of
stablefor thebusyboximage in production environments to ensure consistency and reproducibility of deployments.
74-74: Approved: Addition of imagePullPolicy for wait-for-discoverer init containerThe addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor thewait-for-discovererinit container is consistent with the previous change and aligns with the PR objectives.As with the previous init container, consider using a specific image tag instead of
stablefor thebusyboximage in production environments to ensure consistency and reproducibility of deployments.
Line range hint
1-204: Overall review: Consistent and beneficial changes to init container configurationThe changes made to this deployment configuration file are consistent with the PR objectives and improve the management of init containers. The addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto both init containers ensures that the latest versions of these images are always pulled, which can be beneficial for development and testing environments.The rest of the deployment configuration remains unchanged and includes best practices such as:
- Comprehensive resource limits and requests
- Security contexts for containers and pods
- Liveness, readiness, and startup probes
- Proper labeling and annotations
For production deployments, consider:
- Using specific image tags for all containers, including init containers, to ensure consistency and reproducibility.
- Evaluating the impact of always pulling images on deployment time and network usage, especially in environments with limited bandwidth or where deployment speed is critical.
- Implementing a strategy for managing image updates that balances the need for the latest versions with stability and predictability in production environments.
k8s/gateway/gateway/lb/deployment.yaml (1)
Update the main container's
imagePullPolicyfor consistencyThe main
vald-lb-gatewaycontainer currently does not specifyimagePullPolicy, whereas the init containers haveimagePullPolicy: Always. For consistency and to ensure that the latest image is always pulled, consider explicitly settingimagePullPolicy: Alwaysin the main container as well.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
102-103: Consider updating the main container'simagePullPolicyfor consistency.The init containers now have
imagePullPolicy: Always, but the mainvald-lb-gatewaycontainer still uses the defaultimagePullPolicy. For consistency, you might want to consider explicitly settingimagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor the main container as well, if it aligns with your deployment strategy.To check the current
imagePullPolicyfor the main container, you can run:If the output doesn't show an explicit
imagePullPolicy, consider adding it to match the init containers.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash grep -A 5 "name: vald-lb-gateway" k8s/gateway/gateway/lb/deployment.yamlLength of output: 1058
tests/e2e/operation/multi.go (2)
Line range hint
233-237: Consider improving the visibility of the API behavior noteThe comment about the MultiUpdate API behavior is crucial for understanding the response handling:
// Note: The MultiUpdate API internally checks the identity of the vectors to be updated by the LB Gateway, // so it is important to remember that the number of responses is not always the same as the number of requested data. // The response includes an ID, so the client can check the order of the data based on the requested ID.Consider moving this note to the method's documentation comment or to a separate documentation file to improve its visibility and ensure that all developers working with this API are aware of this behavior.
Line range hint
273-277: Consider consolidating API behavior notesThe note about the MultiUpsert API behavior is very similar to the one for MultiUpdate:
// Note: The MultiUpsert API internally checks the identity of the vectors to be updated by the LB Gateway, // so it is important to remember that the number of responses is not always the same as the number of requested data. // The response includes an ID, so the client can check the order of the data based on the requested ID.To reduce duplication and improve maintainability, consider consolidating these notes into a single, well-documented location that applies to both MultiUpdate and MultiUpsert operations. This could be in a shared documentation file or as part of the package-level documentation.
example/client/main.go (2)
69-69: LGTM! Consider handling connection closure.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis correct and aligns with the PR objective to replace the deprecated interface from grpc-go. This update improves the code by using the recommended method for establishing a gRPC connection.Consider adding a deferred connection close to ensure proper resource management:
conn, err := grpc.NewClient(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials())) if err != nil { glg.Fatal(err) } +defer conn.Close()This ensures that the connection is properly closed when the
mainfunction exits.
Line range hint
1-224: Consider improving error handling and security.While the main change in this file is correct, there are a few general improvements that could be made to enhance the overall quality and security of the code:
Error Handling: The current error handling strategy uses
glg.Fatal(), which immediately terminates the program. Consider implementing more graceful error handling for non-critical errors, allowing the program to continue running or retry operations where appropriate.Security: The example uses insecure credentials (
insecure.NewCredentials()). While this might be acceptable for a local example, it's important to note that this should not be used in a production environment. Consider adding a comment to highlight this, or provide an option to use secure credentials.Configuration: The hardcoded values for search configuration (like
Num,Radius,Epsilon,Timeout) could be made configurable through command-line flags or environment variables, similar to howdatasetPathandgrpcServerAddrare handled.Here's an example of how you might improve the security consideration:
+// Note: This example uses insecure credentials for simplicity. +// In a production environment, use proper authentication mechanisms. conn, err := grpc.NewClient(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials()))These suggestions aim to make the example more robust and informative for users who might adapt it for their own use.
internal/net/net.go (1)
160-162: Approve the change with a minor suggestion for improvement.The modification to suppress warning logs for missing port errors is a good improvement. It aligns with the PR objective of enhancing log readability and reduces unnecessary warnings for common scenarios.
Consider extracting the error message into a constant for better maintainability:
+const errMissingPort = "missing port in address" func Parse(addr string) (host string, port uint16, isLocal, isIPv4, isIPv6 bool, err error) { host, port, err = SplitHostPort(addr) if err != nil { - if !errors.Is(err, errors.Errorf("address %s: missing port in address", addr)) { + if !errors.Is(err, errors.Errorf("address %s: %s", addr, errMissingPort)) { log.Warnf("failed to parse addr %s\terror: %v", addr, err) } host = addr }This change would make it easier to update the error message in the future if needed and improve code readability.
.github/workflows/e2e-profiling.yaml (4)
62-67: LGTM with a minor consideration.The addition of the profefe deployment step is a good enhancement for profiling capabilities. However, consider the following:
- The cron job is set to run every minute (
*/1 * * * *). While this is fine for testing, it might be too frequent for production use and could potentially impact performance.Consider parameterizing the cron job schedule or using a less frequent schedule for production environments.
Line range hint
88-102: LGTM with suggestions for improvement.The addition of the "Get profiles" step is valuable for collecting profiling data. However, consider the following improvements:
- The date range for profile collection is hardcoded (2021-07-01 to 2030-07-01). This might not be flexible enough for long-term use.
- There's no error handling for the curl commands. If one fails, the others will still execute, potentially leading to incomplete data.
Consider the following improvements:
- Use environment variables or GitHub Actions inputs for the date range.
- Add error checking for each curl command and the kubectl port-forward command.
- Use a loop for the service names to make the code more DRY.
Example refactor:
- name: Get profiles shell: bash run: | mkdir -p profiles kubectl port-forward deployment/profefe 10100:10100 & PF_PID=$! sleep 3 services=(vald-agent-ngt vald-lb-gateway vald-discoverer vald-manager-index) types=(heap cpu goroutine threadcreate) from_date="${{ github.event.inputs.from_date || '2021-07-01T00:00:00' }}" to_date="${{ github.event.inputs.to_date || '2030-07-01T00:00:00' }}" for svc in "${services[@]}"; do for t in "${types[@]}"; do if ! curl -f "http://localhost:10100/api/0/profiles/merge?service=${svc}&type=${t}&from=${from_date}&to=${to_date}" \ --output profiles/${svc}-${t}.pb; then echo "Failed to fetch ${t} profile for ${svc}" kill $PF_PID exit 1 fi done done kill $PF_PID
Line range hint
124-156: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistency.The modifications to the "Generate graphs" step significantly improve the tagging mechanism and add support for both SVG and PNG formats. The conditional generation of diff graphs is a good optimization. However, there's a minor inconsistency in the naming convention:
- The diff graphs are named with the pattern
${svc}-${t}-diff-${tag}-${GITHUB_SHA::6}, while the non-diff graphs use${svc}-${t}-${GITHUB_SHA::6}.Consider standardizing the naming convention for all generated graphs. For example:
# For non-diff graphs go tool pprof --svg profiles/${svc}-${t}.pb > graphs/${svc}-${t}-${tag}-${GITHUB_SHA::6}.svg go tool pprof --png profiles/${svc}-${t}.pb > graphs/${svc}-${t}-${tag}-${GITHUB_SHA::6}.png # For diff graphs (unchanged) go tool pprof --svg -base=profiles-main/${svc}-${t}.pb profiles/${svc}-${t}.pb > graphs/${svc}-${t}-diff-${tag}-${GITHUB_SHA::6}.svg go tool pprof --png -base=profiles-main/${svc}-${t}.pb profiles/${svc}-${t}.pb > graphs/${svc}-${t}-diff-${tag}-${GITHUB_SHA::6}.pngThis would make it easier to identify and compare graphs across different runs and versions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:29: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:44: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:99: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:14: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:25: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:4: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:18: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Line range hint
173-200: LGTM with a suggestion for improved readability.The modifications to the "Comment" step enhance the formatting of the profile report, making it more informative and easier to read. The addition of a link to other images is a valuable improvement. However, the construction of the comment body using string concatenation can be hard to read and maintain.
Consider using a heredoc for the comment body to improve readability and maintainability. Here's an example of how you could refactor this:
- name: Comment if: github.event.action == 'labeled' && github.event.label.name == 'actions/e2e-profiling' shell: bash run: | base="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vdaas-ci/vald-ci-images/main/${GITHUB_SHA::6}" services=(vald-agent-ngt vald-lb-gateway vald-discoverer vald-manager-index) types=(cpu heap) generate_table() { local body="" body+="<table><tr><th>type</th>" for svc in "${services[@]}"; do body+="<th>$svc</th>" done body+="</tr>" for t in "${types[@]}"; do body+="<tr><td>${t}</td>" for svc in "${services[@]}"; do body+="<td><img src=\"$base/${svc}-${t}-${GITHUB_SHA::6}.png\" width=\"100%\"></td>" done body+="</tr>" done body+="</table>" echo "$body" } table=$(generate_table) comment_body=$(cat <<EOF # Profile Report $table <a href="https://github.com/vdaas-ci/vald-ci-images/tree/main/${GITHUB_SHA::6}">other images</a> EOF ) curl --include --verbose --fail \ -H "Accept: application/json" \ -H "Content-Type:application/json" \ -H "Authorization: token ${GITHUB_TOKEN}" \ --request POST \ --data "{\"body\": $(jq -n --arg body "$comment_body" '$body')}" \ $API_URL env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.DISPATCH_TOKEN }} API_URL: ${{ github.event.pull_request.comments_url }}This refactoring uses a heredoc for the comment body and a separate function to generate the table, making the code more modular and easier to maintain.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:24:1: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
example/client/agent/main.go (1)
70-70: Excellent update to usegrpc.NewClient!This change correctly implements the new gRPC client creation method, aligning with the latest best practices and addressing the deprecation of
grpc.DialContext. The update maintains the same functionality while using the most current API.Consider enhancing error handling by explicitly checking for a nil connection before proceeding:
conn, err := grpc.NewClient(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials())) if err != nil { glg.Fatal(err) } +if conn == nil { + glg.Fatal("Failed to create gRPC client: connection is nil") +}This additional check ensures that the connection was successfully established before proceeding with client creation.
internal/core/algorithm/usearch/usearch_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Review overall test coverage and consider additional test cases.With the removal of the duplicate vector insertion test and the changes in expected distances, it's important to ensure that the test suite still provides comprehensive coverage of the usearch functionality. Consider the following suggestions:
- If duplicate vector insertion is still a valid use case, add a new test or modify an existing one to cover this scenario.
- Add test cases that specifically verify the accuracy of distance calculations, especially for edge cases.
- Consider adding tests for different metric types (e.g., Euclidean, Manhattan) if not already present.
- Ensure that there are tests covering the behavior of the search function with different
quantizationTypeandmetricTypeconfigurations.To help identify potential gaps in test coverage, you might want to use a code coverage tool and aim for a high percentage of coverage for the main usearch implementation.
docs/tutorial/get-started-with-faiss-agent.md (5)
Line range hint
1-89: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive deployment instructions.The introduction and deployment section provide clear, step-by-step instructions for setting up Vald with the Faiss agent. The configuration details are thorough and helpful for users.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what Faiss is and why a user might choose it over the default NGT agent. This would provide more context for users new to Vald or vector databases.
Line range hint
91-150: LGTM! Comprehensive verification steps provided.The verification section includes clear instructions for checking the deployment status using kubectl commands. The example outputs are helpful for users to understand what to expect.
Consider adding brief explanations for each verification step, highlighting what users should look for in the outputs. For example, explain what a "Running" status means for pods or what the presence of an ingress entry indicates. This would help users better interpret the results of their deployment.
Line range hint
281-285: Inconsistency in gRPC client creation.The code snippet for creating the gRPC connection uses
grpc.NewClient, which is inconsistent with the standard gRPC client creation method. This might confuse users or cause errors.Consider updating the code to use the standard gRPC Dial function:
-conn, err := grpc.NewClient(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithInsecure()) +conn, err := grpc.Dial(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithInsecure())Also, ensure that the
vald.NewValdClient(conn)call is compatible with this change.
Line range hint
420-424: LGTM! Clear cleanup instruction provided.The cleanup section provides a simple and clear command to remove the deployed Vald Cluster.
Consider adding instructions for additional cleanup steps, such as:
- Stopping any running port-forward processes.
- Removing the downloaded Fashion-MNIST dataset.
- Cleaning up any local configuration files or directories created during the tutorial.
This would ensure a more comprehensive cleanup process for users.
Line range hint
426-429: LGTM! Relevant references provided.The References section includes links to the default NGT agent tutorial and the Faiss project, which are both relevant to this tutorial.
Consider adding the following additional references to provide users with more comprehensive resources:
- A link to the main Vald documentation.
- A link to the vald-client-go repository or documentation.
- A link to the Fashion-MNIST dataset repository for users who want to learn more about the data they're working with.
internal/net/dialer.go (1)
249-264: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for improvementThe changes to handle default ports when not explicitly provided are well-implemented and improve the robustness of the dialer. The logic for assigning default ports based on network type is clear and follows good practices.
Consider extracting the default port values into named constants at the package level for better maintainability. For example:
const ( defaultTCPPort = "80" defaultUDPPort = "53" )This would make it easier to update these values in the future if needed and improve code readability.
docs/tutorial/get-started.md (5)
Line range hint
1-24: LGTM! Clear introduction and overview.The introduction and overview sections provide a great starting point for users. The architecture diagram is particularly helpful in visualizing the deployment.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what Fashion-MNIST is and why it's used as an example dataset. This would provide more context for users unfamiliar with the dataset.
Line range hint
26-59: LGTM! Clear requirements and helpful installation instructions.The requirements section clearly states the necessary versions and provides useful installation commands for Helm and HDF5.
Consider adding a brief explanation of why libhdf5 is required specifically for this tutorial. This would help users understand the purpose of each requirement.
Line range hint
61-95: LGTM! Clear instructions for preparing the Kubernetes cluster.The section provides clear instructions for setting up a Kubernetes cluster, including the necessary components like Ingress and Metrics Server. The provided commands are correct and helpful.
Consider adding a note about potential differences in setup for other Kubernetes providers or local development tools. This would help users who might be using a different setup.
Line range hint
97-203: LGTM! Comprehensive deployment instructions.The deployment instructions are clear, comprehensive, and easy to follow. The inclusion of verification steps is particularly helpful for users to confirm successful deployment.
Consider adding a troubleshooting section or link to common deployment issues and their solutions. This would be helpful for users who encounter problems during deployment.
Line range hint
517-531: LGTM! Helpful next steps and resources.The "Next Steps" section provides good guidance for users who want to learn more about Vald, including links to other tutorials and recommended documentation.
Consider adding a link to the Vald community resources (e.g., GitHub discussions, Slack channel) where users can ask questions or get help if they encounter issues.
docs/user-guides/client-api-config.md (4)
49-49: Approve the updated gRPC connection method with a minor suggestion.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientaligns with the PR objective of replacing deprecated interfaces. This update improves the code by using the latest recommended method for establishing a gRPC connection.Consider adding a comment explaining the change from
DialContexttoNewClientfor users who might be familiar with the old method. For example:// Create connection +// Note: We now use grpc.NewClient instead of the deprecated grpc.DialContext conn, err := grpc.NewClient(target)This addition would help users understand the reason for the change and provide context for the new method usage.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
49-49: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
473-473: Approve the gRPC connection update and new AggregationAlgorithm feature.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientin the Search Service section maintains consistency with the previous updates. Additionally, the introduction of theAggregationAlgorithmconfiguration option is a valuable enhancement to the Search service.The detailed explanations for each aggregation algorithm provide users with clear guidance on when to use each option, which is extremely helpful for optimizing search performance based on specific use cases.
Consider adding a note about the performance implications of choosing different aggregation algorithms. For example, you could mention that users should benchmark their specific use cases with different algorithms to find the optimal configuration for their workload.
Also applies to: 473-524
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
473-473: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
656-656: Approve the consistent update to the gRPC connection method and summarize overall changes.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientin the Remove Service section completes the consistent update across all service examples in the documentation. This uniform approach enhances the overall quality and maintainability of the codebase.The consistent updates across all sections (Insert, Update, Upsert, Search, and Remove) demonstrate a thorough and systematic approach to updating the API documentation. This consistency will help users understand and implement the new connection method across different services more easily. Consider adding a note at the beginning of the document mentioning this global change to help users who might be skimming or referring to specific sections.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
656-656: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
49-49: Consider replacing hard tabs with spaces in code blocks.The Markdownlint tool has flagged the use of hard tabs in code blocks on lines 49, 165, 289, 473, and 656. While these don't affect the rendered output, it's generally recommended to use spaces instead of tabs in Markdown files for better consistency across different editors and platforms.
Consider replacing the hard tabs with spaces in all code blocks throughout the document. This can typically be done automatically by most text editors or IDEs. For example, you could use 4 spaces to represent each level of indentation in the code blocks.
Also applies to: 165-165, 289-289, 473-473, 656-656
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
49-49: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
internal/net/grpc/client.go (2)
170-170: Consider the implications of removinggrpc.WithBlock()The removal of
grpc.WithBlock()from the connection attempt changes the behavior of the connection process. Without this option, the connection attempt will return immediately, potentially before the connection is fully established.While this change can improve responsiveness, it also introduces the possibility of proceeding with an unestablished connection. To mitigate potential issues:
- Ensure that subsequent code checks the connection status before use.
- Implement retry logic for operations that may fail due to an unestablished connection.
- Consider adding a connection readiness check after the
Connectcall.conn, err := g.Connect(ctx, addr) if err != nil { // existing error handling } else { // Add a readiness check ready := make(chan struct{}) go func() { for !conn.IsHealthy(ctx) { time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond) } close(ready) }() select { case <-ctx.Done(): return ctx.Err() case <-ready: // Connection is ready } }
Line range hint
1022-1028: Consider adding a non-blocking option to theConnectmethodFor consistency with the changes made in
StartConnectionMonitor, consider adding an option to theConnectmethod to allow for non-blocking connection attempts. This would provide flexibility for callers who may want to avoid blocking behavior.func (g *gRPCClient) Connect( ctx context.Context, addr string, dopts ...DialOption, ) (conn pool.Conn, err error) { // ... existing code ... opts := []pool.Option{ // ... existing options ... pool.WithNonBlocking(true), // Add this option } // ... rest of the method ... }You'll need to implement the
WithNonBlockingoption in thepoolpackage to support this behavior.dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
19-19: Consider addressing the skipped code quality checksThe Dockerfile includes directives to skip certain code quality checks:
- Line 19:
# skipcq: DOK-DL3026,DOK-DL3007- Line 61:
#skipcq: DOK-W1001, DOK-SC2046, DOK-SC2086, DOK-DL3008Suppressing these linter warnings might mask underlying issues. It's advisable to resolve the highlighted problems to enhance code quality and maintain compliance with best practices.
Also applies to: 61-61
internal/net/grpc/errdetails/errdetails.go (1)
57-58: Add comment to explain the purpose oftypePrefixV1Consider adding a comment above the
typePrefixV1constant to explain its purpose and when it should be used. This will enhance code readability and maintainability.internal/net/grpc/pool/pool.go (1)
Line range hint
130-146: Issue:grpc.NewClientis not a valid function in thegrpcpackageAt lines 130-146, the code replaces
grpc.DialContextwithgrpc.NewClient. However, thegrpcpackage does not provide aNewClientfunction. The standard functions to create a new client connection aregrpc.Dialorgrpc.DialContext. Please update the code to use the correct function for establishing a gRPC client connection.internal/net/grpc/status/status.go (1)
Line range hint
243-725: RefactorwithDetailsfunction for improved readability and maintainabilityThe
withDetailsfunction is extensive and contains deeply nested loops and switch statements, which can make it challenging to read and maintain. Consider refactoring this function by:
- Extracting repeated code blocks into helper functions.
- Breaking down the function into smaller, single-responsibility functions for each error detail type.
- Simplifying control flow to reduce nesting levels.
This refactoring will enhance readability, simplify future modifications, and make unit testing more manageable.
tests/e2e/operation/stream.go (1)
Line range hint
1189-1229: Handle context cancellation appropriately in the select statementIn the select statement within the loop, you are checking for
ctx.Done()but not handling it properly. Returningctx.Err()might not be sufficient if you need to perform cleanup or if the surrounding code expects a specific error handling.Consider explicitly handling the context cancellation and breaking out of the loop gracefully:
case <-ctx.Done(): - return ctx.Err() + err := ctx.Err() + if err != nil { + t.Errorf("context cancelled: %v", err) + } + break exit_loop default:This ensures that any necessary cleanup is performed and that the operation exits as expected.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
apis/grpc/v1/agent/sidecar/sidecar_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goexample/client/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumhack/docker/gen/main.gois excluded by!**/gen/**rust/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (72)
- .gitfiles (9 hunks)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md (1 hunks)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security_issue_report.md (1 hunks)
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/e2e-profiling.yaml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/e2e.yaml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (2 hunks)
- charts/vald/templates/_helpers.tpl (1 hunks)
- charts/vald/values.yaml (7 hunks)
- dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- dockers/dev/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- docs/tutorial/get-started-with-faiss-agent.md (1 hunks)
- docs/tutorial/get-started.md (1 hunks)
- docs/tutorial/vald-agent-standalone-on-k8s.md (1 hunks)
- docs/user-guides/client-api-config.md (5 hunks)
- docs/user-guides/filtering-configuration.md (1 hunks)
- example/client/agent/main.go (1 hunks)
- example/client/go.mod (2 hunks)
- example/client/main.go (1 hunks)
- example/client/mirror/main.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (13 hunks)
- internal/core/algorithm/usearch/usearch_test.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/dialer.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/client.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/codes/codes.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/errdetails/errdetails.go (2 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/interceptor/server/logging/accesslog.go (5 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/pool/pool.go (4 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/pool/pool_bench_test.go (2 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/status/status.go (4 hunks)
- internal/net/net.go (1 hunks)
- internal/observability/exporter/otlp/otlp.go (1 hunks)
- internal/observability/trace/status.go (1 hunks)
- k8s/gateway/gateway/ing.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/gateway/gateway/lb/deployment.yaml (2 hunks)
- k8s/gateway/gateway/mirror/deployment.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/index/job/correction/cronjob.yaml (2 hunks)
- k8s/index/job/creation/cronjob.yaml (2 hunks)
- k8s/index/job/save/cronjob.yaml (2 hunks)
- k8s/index/operator/configmap.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/index/operator/deployment.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/manager/index/deployment.yaml (2 hunks)
- k8s/metrics/loki/loki.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/metrics/loki/promtail.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/metrics/profefe/cronjob.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/metrics/pyroscope/base/deployment.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/metrics/tempo/tempo.yaml (2 hunks)
- pkg/gateway/lb/handler/grpc/handler.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/index/job/save/service/indexer_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/e2e/crud/crud_faiss_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/e2e/crud/crud_test.go (9 hunks)
- tests/e2e/operation/multi.go (8 hunks)
- tests/e2e/operation/operation.go (4 hunks)
- tests/e2e/operation/stream.go (14 hunks)
- tests/e2e/performance/max_vector_dim_test.go (2 hunks)
- versions/CHAOS_MESH_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/DOCKER_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/HELM_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/KUBECTL_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/PROMETHEUS_STACK_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/PROTOBUF_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/REVIEWDOG_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/ACTIONS_CHECKOUT (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/ACTIONS_SETUP_NODE (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_ANALYZE (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_AUTOBUILD (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_INIT (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_UPLOAD_SARIF (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_ISSUE_METRICS (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/PETER_EVANS_CREATE_ISSUE_FROM_FILE (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/PETER_EVANS_CREATE_PULL_REQUEST (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (16)
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
- internal/observability/trace/status.go
- k8s/index/operator/configmap.yaml
- versions/HELM_VERSION
- versions/KUBECTL_VERSION
- versions/PROMETHEUS_STACK_VERSION
- versions/PROTOBUF_VERSION
- versions/REVIEWDOG_VERSION
- versions/actions/ACTIONS_CHECKOUT
- versions/actions/ACTIONS_SETUP_NODE
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_ANALYZE
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_AUTOBUILD
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_INIT
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_UPLOAD_SARIF
- versions/actions/PETER_EVANS_CREATE_ISSUE_FROM_FILE
- versions/actions/PETER_EVANS_CREATE_PULL_REQUEST
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
example/client/agent/main.go (1)
Learnt from: kpango PR: vdaas/vald#2638 File: docs/tutorial/vald-agent-standalone-on-k8s.md:239-239 Timestamp: 2024-09-21T05:35:36.818Z Learning: In grpc-go, `grpc.DialContext` has been deprecated and `grpc.NewClient` should be used instead.
🪛 Markdownlint
docs/user-guides/client-api-config.md
49-49: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
165-165: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
289-289: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
473-473: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
656-656: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
docs/user-guides/filtering-configuration.md
156-156: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
🔇 Additional comments (93)
versions/DOCKER_VERSION (1)
1-1: LGTM: Docker version update approved.The Docker version has been correctly updated from v27.2.1 to v27.3.1. This minor version bump aligns with the PR objectives of updating dependencies.
To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script to check for any other references to the Docker version that might need updating:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in Docker version references throughout the project.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Docker version update approved.
The Docker version has been correctly updated from v27.2.1 to v27.3.1. No other references to these versions were found in the codebase, ensuring consistency across the project.
However, please perform a quick manual review to confirm that no references were missed due to earlier script execution errors.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other references to the old Docker version (v27.2.1) that might need updating. echo "Searching for other references to Docker version v27.2.1:" rg --type-not md "v27\.2\.1" -g '!versions/DOCKER_VERSION' echo "Searching for inconsistent references to the new Docker version v27.3.1:" rg --type-not md "v27\.3\.1" -g '!versions/DOCKER_VERSION'Length of output: 401
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there are other references to Docker versions v27.2.1 and v27.3.1 outside versions/DOCKER_VERSION. echo "Searching for other references to Docker version v27.2.1 outside versions/DOCKER_VERSION:" fd --type f --exclude 'versions/DOCKER_VERSION' | xargs rg "v27\.2\.1" || echo "No references found for v27.2.1." echo "Searching for other references to Docker version v27.3.1 outside versions/DOCKER_VERSION:" fd --type f --exclude 'versions/DOCKER_VERSION' | xargs rg "v27\.3\.1" || echo "No references found for v27.3.1."Length of output: 1631
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there are other references to Docker versions v27.2.1 and v27.3.1 outside versions/DOCKER_VERSION. echo "Searching for other references to Docker version v27.2.1 outside versions/DOCKER_VERSION:" rg "v27\.2\.1" --glob '!.git' --glob '!versions/DOCKER_VERSION' || echo "No references found for v27.2.1." echo "Searching for other references to Docker version v27.3.1 outside versions/DOCKER_VERSION:" rg "v27\.3\.1" --glob '!.git' --glob '!versions/DOCKER_VERSION' || echo "No references found for v27.3.1."Length of output: 659
example/client/go.mod (3)
28-28: LGTM: Consistent gRPC version update in require section.The update to
google.golang.org/grpc v1.67.0in the require section is consistent with the earlier replace directive. This ensures that the main require section is in sync with the replace directives, maintaining consistency throughout the file.
36-36: LGTM: golang.org/x/net dependency update.The update of
golang.org/x/nettov0.28.0is in line with the general dependency updates mentioned in the PR objectives. This update likely includes important bug fixes and improvements.
14-17: LGTM: Dependency updates align with PR objectives.The updates to
google.golang.org/genproto, its subpackages, andgoogle.golang.org/grpcare in line with the PR objectives. The move togrpc v1.67.0is particularly important as it likely includes the replacement of deprecated interfaces mentioned in the PR summary.Let's verify the consistency of these updates throughout the file:
k8s/gateway/gateway/ing.yaml (3)
41-47: LGTM: Root path configuration is correct.The root path configuration is well-structured and follows Kubernetes Ingress best practices. Using
ImplementationSpecificpathType is appropriate for gRPC services, allowing flexibility in path matching.
48-54: LGTM: gRPC reflection service path (v1alpha) is correctly configured.The path for the gRPC reflection service (v1alpha) is well-defined. Using
ImplementationSpecificpathType is suitable for gRPC services. This configuration enables gRPC reflection, which is beneficial for service discovery and debugging.
55-56: LGTM: gRPC reflection service path (v1) is correctly configured.The path for the gRPC reflection service (v1) is well-defined. Using
ImplementationSpecificpathType is suitable for gRPC services. This configuration enables gRPC reflection using the v1 API. The inclusion of both v1alpha and v1 paths suggests good backward compatibility support.internal/net/grpc/codes/codes.go (1)
Line range hint
1-87: Overall, excellent additions to thecodespackage.The introduction of the
CodeTypeinterface and theToStringfunction significantly enhances the handling of gRPC status codes in the Vald project. These changes align well with the PR objectives and demonstrate good use of Go's generics feature.Key points:
- The
CodeTypeinterface provides flexible type constraints.- The
ToStringfunction offers a generic way to convert status codes to strings.- The implementation is clean, well-structured, and easy to understand.
The suggested improvements (adding a comment to
CodeTypeand considering a map-based implementation forToString) are minor and aimed at further enhancing documentation and potential performance.Great job on these refactorings!
k8s/metrics/loki/loki.yaml (1)
34-34: Approve the change toimagePullPolicy: AlwaysThe change from
IfNotPresenttoAlwaysfor theimagePullPolicyensures that the latest version of the Loki image is always used. This aligns with the PR's objective of implementing updates and refactorings.While this change may slightly increase deployment time and network usage, it reduces the risk of running outdated versions, which is particularly important for logging and monitoring systems like Loki.
To ensure this change is consistent across the deployment, please run the following command:
This will help verify that the
imagePullPolicyis consistently set toAlwaysfor all Loki deployments in the project.✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete: All Loki deployments use
imagePullPolicy: AlwaysThe shell script confirmed that the
imagePullPolicyis set toAlwaysink8s/metrics/loki/loki.yaml.No other Loki deployments were found that override this setting.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all Loki deployments use imagePullPolicy: Always # Test: Search for Loki deployments and their imagePullPolicy # Expect: All Loki deployments should use imagePullPolicy: Always rg --type yaml 'image:\s*grafana/loki' -A 5 | rg 'imagePullPolicy:'Length of output: 128
dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile (2)
Line range hint
1-90: Summary: Dockerfile changes are well-implemented and align with PR objectives.The modifications to the Dockerfile, including the addition of the
CARGO_HOMEenvironment variable and the streamlined installation process, are consistent with the PR objectives. The use of a distroless base image maintains good security practices. Overall, the changes appear to improve the build process and environment setup for the Vald agent.
Line range hint
1-90: Overall changes look good. Verify build process.The modifications to the Dockerfile, including the streamlined installation commands, explicit locale and timezone configurations, and the use of a distroless base image, align well with the PR objectives and best practices for container security.
To ensure the changes haven't introduced any issues in the build process, please run the following verification script:
This script will build the Docker image and perform basic checks to ensure the agent binary is present and functional.
k8s/metrics/tempo/tempo.yaml (2)
94-94: Approved: imagePullPolicy updated to 'Always' for 'tempo-query' containerThis change is consistent with the update made to the 'tempo' container and aligns with the PR objectives.
Please refer to the previous comment regarding the 'tempo' container for considerations and trade-offs of this change.
76-76: Approved: imagePullPolicy updated to 'Always' for 'tempo' containerThis change ensures that the latest image is always pulled, which aligns with the PR objectives. It can be beneficial for frequently updated images and ensures consistency across environments.
However, consider the following trade-offs:
- Increased deployment time due to image pulling on each pod creation.
- Increased network usage, which might impact costs in cloud environments.
To verify the impact, you can run the following command to check the image pull time:
Compare this with previous deployment times to assess the impact on your specific environment.
internal/net/grpc/interceptor/server/logging/accesslog.go (5)
22-22: LGTM: New imports are appropriate for the added functionality.The addition of the "fmt" package and the "status" package from the internal grpc module are necessary for the new
String()method and improved error handling in the logging functionality.Also applies to: 26-29
38-38: LGTM: New constant improves code clarity.The addition of the
rpcFailedMessageconstant is a good practice. It centralizes the message text for failed RPC calls, making it easier to maintain and update if needed in the future.
118-120: LGTM: Improved logging in AccessLogInterceptor.The changes in the
AccessLogInterceptorfunction enhance the logging functionality:
- Using
rpcFailedMessagefor failed RPC calls improves the accuracy of the log messages.- Utilizing
entity.String()ensures that the detailed string representation, including error information, is logged.These modifications will make debugging and monitoring easier by providing more accurate and detailed log entries.
166-168: LGTM: Consistent improvements in AccessLogStreamInterceptor.The changes in the
AccessLogStreamInterceptorfunction mirror those inAccessLogInterceptor:
- Using
rpcFailedMessagefor failed RPC calls.- Utilizing
entity.String()for detailed log entries.These consistent modifications ensure that both unary and stream interceptors benefit from the improved logging functionality, maintaining uniformity across the logging system.
Line range hint
1-182: Overall assessment: Significant improvements to logging functionality.The changes in this file enhance the logging capabilities of the gRPC interceptors:
- The new
String()method forAccessLogEntityprovides detailed and structured log entries.- Error handling and reporting have been improved, including gRPC status information when available.
- Logging statements in both
AccessLogInterceptorandAccessLogStreamInterceptorhave been updated for consistency and accuracy.These modifications will greatly aid in debugging and monitoring gRPC calls. The only suggestion for further improvement is to consider including the error message as a JSON field in the
String()method output for easier parsing.Great work on enhancing the logging functionality!
internal/net/grpc/pool/pool_bench_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-210: Overall, the changes in this file are well-implemented and align with the PR objectives.The updates to
Benchmark_StaticDialandBenchmarkParallel_StaticDialfunctions correctly implement the transition fromgrpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClient. This change follows the latest recommendations from the grpc-go documentation and maintains the original functionality of the benchmark tests.A few minor suggestions were made to improve code clarity and maintainability:
- Adding TODO comments to remind developers about using secure credentials in production environments.
These changes do not affect the benchmark logic or results, ensuring that the tests continue to serve their intended purpose while using up-to-date gRPC client creation methods.
internal/observability/exporter/otlp/otlp.go (1)
34-34: LGTM. Verify semconv package usage across the project.The update of the OpenTelemetry semantic conventions package from v1.24.0 to v1.26.0 looks good. This minor version update should maintain backward compatibility.
To ensure a smooth transition:
Please review the changelog for versions 1.25.0 and 1.26.0 to check for any important updates or potential breaking changes.
Run the following script to identify other files that might be using the semconv package and may need attention:
This will help identify any other parts of the project that might need to be updated or verified for compatibility with the new version.
k8s/index/job/save/cronjob.yaml (3)
56-56: Approved: Addition of imagePullPolicy for wait-for-agent containerThe addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor the wait-for-agent initContainer is a good practice. This ensures that the latest version of the busybox:stable image is always used, maintaining consistency across different runs of the CronJob.While this may slightly increase the job start time if the image is already present on the node, it guarantees that you're always using the most up-to-date version of the init container image.
68-68: Approved: Consistent imagePullPolicy for wait-for-discoverer containerThe addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto the wait-for-discoverer initContainer is consistent with the change made to the wait-for-agent container. This ensures uniformity in the behavior of both initContainers and aligns with the PR objective of introducing animagePullPolicyconfiguration.This change maintains the same benefits and considerations as discussed for the wait-for-agent container.
Line range hint
1-168: Summary: Consistent and beneficial changes to initContainersThe changes made to this CronJob configuration file are focused and consistent. Both initContainers (wait-for-agent and wait-for-discoverer) have been updated with
imagePullPolicy: Always, which aligns with the PR objective of introducing animagePullPolicyconfiguration for initContainers.These changes ensure that the latest versions of the initContainer images are always used, promoting consistency and up-to-date environments across different runs of the CronJob. While this may slightly increase job start times, it's generally a good practice for maintaining system reliability and security.
The rest of the CronJob configuration, including its schedule, job template, and main container specifications, remains unchanged. This focused approach to modifications helps maintain the overall integrity and intended functionality of the vald-index-save CronJob.
k8s/index/job/creation/cronjob.yaml (1)
68-68: Approved: Addition ofimagePullPolicy: Alwaysto wait-for-discoverer init containerThe addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto thewait-for-discovererinit container is consistent with the change made to thewait-for-agentinit container. This ensures uniformity in the image pulling policy across all init containers in this CronJob.The considerations mentioned in the previous comment regarding the trade-offs of using
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysapply here as well.k8s/index/job/correction/cronjob.yaml (2)
68-68: Approved: Addition ofimagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor thewait-for-discovererinit container.This change is consistent with the previous modification to the
wait-for-agentinit container. It ensures that the latest version of thebusybox:stableimage is always pulled for this init container as well.The considerations mentioned in the previous comment about potentially using
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresentapply here as well for consistency.
Line range hint
1-168: Summary: Consistent implementation ofimagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor init containersThe changes made to this CronJob configuration file are consistent and align with the PR objectives. Both init containers (
wait-for-agentandwait-for-discoverer) now haveimagePullPolicy: Alwaysset, which ensures that the latestbusybox:stableimage is always pulled. This improves the reliability and consistency of the job execution across all nodes in the cluster.While these changes are approved, consider the trade-off between guaranteed latest images and potential increased startup time and network usage. If absolute consistency is required, the current configuration is optimal. However, if efficiency is a concern, you might want to evaluate using
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresentfor these stable images.No other modifications were made to the file, and the overall structure and configuration of the CronJob remain intact and appropriate for its purpose.
k8s/index/operator/deployment.yaml (1)
49-49: LGTM: ConfigMap checksum update.The update to the
checksum/configmapannotation is correct and follows best practices for triggering rolling updates when the ConfigMap changes.To ensure this change is intentional and corresponds to actual ConfigMap updates, please run the following script:
tests/e2e/performance/max_vector_dim_test.go (2)
Line range hint
128-139: LGTM: gRPC client creation updated correctlyThe change from
DialContexttoNewClientaligns with the PR objectives and follows the updated grpc-go documentation. The new implementation correctly sets up the gRPC client with appropriate connection parameters.
Line range hint
182-185: Improved error handling for SearchByIDThe error checking logic for
SearchByIDhas been refined. It now explicitly checks for a non-nil error before proceeding, which is a good practice for robust error handling.k8s/gateway/gateway/mirror/deployment.yaml (1)
58-58: Approved: ExplicitimagePullPolicyimproves consistency and securitySetting
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor thewait-for-gateway-lbinit container is a good practice. This ensures that the latest version of the init container image is always used, which can be beneficial for:
- Consistency across different environments
- Ensuring the latest security patches are applied
- Avoiding potential issues with cached outdated images
While this may slightly increase pod startup time, the benefits in terms of reliability and security outweigh this minor drawback.
tests/e2e/operation/operation.go (2)
Line range hint
185-198: Approved: Good alignment with PR objectives.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientaligns well with the PR objective of replacing deprecated interfaces from grpc-go. The removal of the context parameter is consistent with this change.The keepalive parameters are maintained, which is good for ensuring long-lived connections. This change effectively modernizes the gRPC client creation process.
Line range hint
1-232: Summary of changes and their impactThe modifications in this file consistently remove
context.Contextparameters from method signatures and update gRPC client creation methods. These changes align with the PR objectives of replacing deprecated interfaces from grpc-go.While these changes simplify the API, they may impact the ability to set timeouts or cancel operations at a granular level. To mitigate this, consider implementing timeout-aware versions of key functions or adding optional timeout parameters to maintain flexibility in controlling operation lifecycles.
Overall, the changes modernize the codebase and streamline the API, but careful consideration should be given to maintaining timeout and cancellation capabilities where necessary.
k8s/gateway/gateway/lb/deployment.yaml (3)
61-61: Approved: Addition ofimagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor thewait-for-discovererinit container.This change ensures that the latest version of the init container image is always pulled, which can help maintain consistency and up-to-date behavior. However, be aware that this may slightly increase deployment time and network usage.
73-73: Approved: Addition ofimagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor thewait-for-agentinit container.This change is consistent with the previous init container modification and ensures that the latest version of the init container image is always pulled. The same considerations regarding deployment time and network usage apply here as well.
Line range hint
1-203: Summary: Consistent updates to init containers'imagePullPolicyThe changes in this file are minimal but consistent, focusing on adding
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto both init containers (wait-for-discovererandwait-for-agent). These modifications align with the PR objectives for refactoring and ensure that the latest versions of the init container images are always pulled.The overall structure and configuration of the deployment remain intact, which is appropriate if no other modifications were needed for this release. The changes should help maintain consistency and up-to-date behavior of the init containers, with a slight trade-off in potentially increased deployment time and network usage.
Consider reviewing the
imagePullPolicyfor the main container as well, to ensure consistency across the entire deployment if needed.tests/e2e/operation/multi.go (2)
Line range hint
1-318: Summary of changes and suggestion for comprehensive reviewThe changes in this file consistently remove the
ctxparameter from thegetClient()call across all methods. While this refactoring aligns with the PR objectives, it's important to ensure that these changes don't introduce any unintended consequences. To complete this review:
- A comprehensive review of the
getClient()function implementation is necessary to understand the full impact of removing the context parameter.- Consider consolidating and improving the visibility of API behavior notes, particularly for MultiUpdate and MultiUpsert operations.
- Verify that these changes are consistent with the overall error handling and timeout management strategy in the project.
To facilitate this review, please provide the implementation of the
getClient()function. You can use the following command to locate it:#!/bin/bash # Search for the getClient function definition rg --type go 'func.*getClient\(' -C 10
27-27: Verify the impact of removingctxfromgetClient()The context parameter has been removed from the
getClient()call. While this aligns with the PR's refactoring objective, it's important to understand the implications:
- How does this affect error handling or timeout management in
getClient()?- Is this change consistent across the entire codebase?
- What's the rationale behind this change?
Please provide clarification on these points to ensure the change doesn't introduce unexpected behavior.
To check for consistency, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Removal of
ctxfromgetClient()is consistent across the codebaseAll instances of
getClient()have been updated to exclude thectxparameter. The context (ctx) is still appropriately used in subsequent client method calls, ensuring that error handling and timeout management remain unaffected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences of getClient() in the codebase rg --type go 'getClient\(\)' -C 3Length of output: 1319
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected search for all occurrences of getClient() in Go files with 3 lines of context rg --type go 'getClient\(\)' -C 3Length of output: 8313
example/client/mirror/main.go (1)
71-71: LGTM: Deprecated method replaced as per PR objectives.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientaligns with the PR objective to replace the deprecated interface from grpc-go. This update follows the recommendations in the grpc-go documentation.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
This will help identify any instances where the old method might still be in use and confirm that the new method is being used consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Deprecated
grpc.DialContexthas been fully removed, andgrpc.NewClientis used consistently across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of grpc.DialContext and verify consistent usage of grpc.NewClient # Search for any remaining usage of grpc.DialContext echo "Checking for any remaining usage of grpc.DialContext:" rg --type go 'grpc\.DialContext' # Verify consistent usage of grpc.NewClient echo "Verifying consistent usage of grpc.NewClient:" rg --type go 'grpc\.NewClient'Length of output: 1401
tests/e2e/crud/crud_faiss_test.go (3)
193-193: Improved error reporting in TestE2EUpdateOnlyThe modification enhances the error message by including the status code. This change aligns with the PR objective of improving error information and follows good practices in error handling. It will make debugging easier by providing more context about the error.
303-303: Consistent error reporting improvement in TestE2EStandardCRUDThis change mirrors the improvement made in
TestE2EUpdateOnly, maintaining consistency across test functions. The enhanced error message, now including the status code, will facilitate easier debugging and aligns with the overall goal of improving error information throughout the codebase.
Line range hint
1-339: Overall assessment of crud_faiss_test.goThe changes made to this file are focused on improving error handling in the e2e tests. These modifications enhance the clarity of error messages by including status codes, which aligns with the PR objectives. The improvements are consistent across different test functions and follow good practices in error reporting.
No other changes were made to the file, and the existing test structure remains intact. The modifications should facilitate easier debugging and improve the overall quality of the test suite.
.github/workflows/e2e-profiling.yaml (1)
Line range hint
69-87: LGTM with a suggestion for error handling.The modifications to the E2E CRUD step provide more flexibility in configuration through environment variables, which is a good practice. However:
- The step is marked with
continue-on-error: true. While this prevents the workflow from failing if this step fails, it might hide potential issues in the E2E tests.Consider adding a step to check the exit code of the E2E CRUD step and log a warning or create a GitHub issue if it fails. This way, you don't block the workflow but still have visibility into potential problems.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
70-70: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:12:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
example/client/agent/main.go (1)
Line range hint
1-328: Overall, the file demonstrates good practices and is well-structured.The update to use
grpc.NewClientis the only change in this file, and it has been implemented correctly. The rest of the file maintains good error handling, logging practices, and helpful comments explaining the purpose of different sections. The code structure and organization remain clear and consistent.internal/core/algorithm/usearch/usearch_test.go (3)
Line range hint
1-1: Summary and RecommendationsThe changes to this test file include the removal of a test case for duplicate vector insertion and modifications to expected search result distances. While the remaining test cases still cover various scenarios, these changes warrant careful consideration:
- Clarify the reasoning behind removing the duplicate vector insertion test case.
- Verify the intentionality and correctness of the modified expected distances.
- Review the overall test coverage to ensure no critical scenarios are left untested.
- Consider adding new test cases to cover any potential gaps in coverage.
I recommend addressing these points to maintain the robustness and comprehensiveness of the test suite. Additionally, it would be beneficial to document any intentional changes in behavior or accuracy that these test modifications reflect.
254-255: Verify the changes in expected search result distances.The expected distances for the first two search results have been modified:
- {ID: uint32(10), Distance: 2.384185791015625e-07}, - {ID: uint32(9), Distance: 5.364418029785156e-07}, + {ID: uint32(10), Distance: 2.384185791015625e-07}, + {ID: uint32(9), Distance: 5.364418029785156e-07},While the values appear to be the same, the fact that these lines were touched in the diff suggests there might have been an intention to change them. Could you please confirm if these modifications are intentional? If so, what improvements or changes in the underlying algorithm do they reflect?
To ensure these changes are consistent with the implementation, let's check for any related changes in the main usearch implementation:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any changes in the distance calculation or search algorithm rg --type go "Distance.*calculation|search algorithm" internal/core/algorithm/usearch/
Line range hint
1-1: Consider the impact of removing the duplicate vector insertion test case.The AI summary indicates that a test case for "return vector id after the same vector inserted" has been removed. This change might reduce the test coverage for handling duplicate vector insertions. Could you please clarify the reasoning behind removing this test case? If the functionality is no longer relevant or is covered by other tests, it would be helpful to document this decision.
To ensure we haven't lost important test coverage, let's verify if there are any remaining tests for duplicate vector insertion:
docs/tutorial/get-started-with-faiss-agent.md (1)
Line range hint
152-280: LGTM! Comprehensive example code and explanation.The "Run Example Code" section provides clear instructions for running the example, including port forwarding and dataset download. The detailed explanation of the code is particularly helpful for users to understand how to interact with Vald.
internal/net/dialer.go (2)
249-264: Overall impact of the changes is positiveThe introduction of default ports for TCP and UDP connections enhances the dialer's functionality without breaking its existing interface. This change improves the robustness of network connections in cases where clients don't specify a port.
Note: Client code that previously relied on empty ports might be affected, but this change likely represents an improvement in most scenarios. Consider documenting this behavior change in the package documentation or release notes.
Line range hint
1-564: Final assessment: Changes are well-implemented and improve the dialerThe modifications to handle default ports in the
cachedDialermethod are well-implemented and integrate seamlessly with the existing codebase. These changes enhance the robustness of the dialer without introducing breaking changes to its interface.The overall code quality of the file remains high, with consistent error handling and logging practices. The changes align well with the file's structure and the project's coding standards.
Suggestions for future improvements:
- Consider extracting default port values into named constants.
- Update package documentation to reflect the new behavior of default port assignment.
- If not already present, consider adding unit tests to cover the new default port logic.
docs/tutorial/vald-agent-standalone-on-k8s.md (1)
239-239: LGTM: Updated gRPC client creation methodThe change from
grpc.Dialtogrpc.NewClientaligns with the PR objective to replace deprecated interfaces from grpc-go. This update improves compatibility with newer versions of the library and follows best practices.docs/tutorial/get-started.md (2)
Line range hint
205-336: LGTM! Clear instructions and helpful code explanation.The instructions for running the example code are clear and comprehensive. The detailed explanation of the code is particularly helpful for users to understand what's happening behind the scenes.
The update to use the latest vald-client-go library (line 336) is a good improvement that ensures users are working with the most up-to-date client.
Line range hint
509-515: LGTM! Clear cleanup instruction.The cleanup section provides a simple and clear command to remove the deployed Vald Cluster.
.github/workflows/e2e.yaml (1)
223-223: Approved: Increased wait time for index creationThe change from 3 minutes to 5 minutes for
E2E_WAIT_FOR_CREATE_INDEX_DURATIONis reasonable if there have been issues with index creation timing out. This should help reduce false negatives in the E2E tests.To ensure this change doesn't significantly impact overall CI time, please monitor the job duration for the next few runs. You can use the following script to check the job duration:
If you notice a significant increase in job duration, consider adjusting the wait time or investigating ways to optimize the index creation process.
pkg/index/job/save/service/indexer_test.go (1)
56-56: Improved error message formattingThe change enhances the clarity of error messages in the test cases. By using
err.Error()andw.err.Error(), we ensure that the error messages are consistently presented as strings, which improves readability and debugging.docs/user-guides/client-api-config.md (3)
165-165: Approve the consistent update to the gRPC connection method.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientin the Update Service section is consistent with the previous update in the Insert Service section. This maintains uniformity across the documentation and ensures that all code samples use the latest recommended method for establishing a gRPC connection.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
165-165: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
289-289: Approve the consistent update to the gRPC connection method across all sections.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientin the Upsert Service section maintains consistency with the previous updates in the Insert and Update Service sections. This uniform approach across all service examples enhances the overall quality and coherence of the documentation.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
289-289: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
Line range hint
1-684: Overall approval of the documentation updates with minor suggestions.The changes made to the Client API Config documentation are comprehensive and align well with the PR objectives. The consistent update of the gRPC connection method across all service examples improves the overall quality and maintainability of the codebase. The addition of the
AggregationAlgorithmfeature in the Search service provides users with more control over search performance.To further enhance the documentation:
- Consider adding a note at the beginning of the document mentioning the global change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClient.- Add a comment in code samples explaining the reason for the connection method change.
- Include a note about benchmarking different aggregation algorithms for optimal performance.
- Replace hard tabs with spaces in all code blocks for better consistency.
These minor improvements will make the documentation even more user-friendly and informative.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
46-46: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
47-47: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
48-48: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
49-49: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
50-50: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
51-51: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
52-52: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
tests/e2e/crud/crud_test.go (8)
448-449: Improved error reporting in UpdateWithParametersThe addition of the error code to the error message enhances debugging capabilities by providing more specific information about the failure.
483-484: Consistent error reporting improvementThis change maintains consistency with the previous error message update, ensuring uniform error reporting across different test cases.
522-523: Added necessary sleep after insert operationThe introduction of a sleep period after the insert operation is crucial for ensuring data consistency in distributed systems. This pause allows time for data propagation before subsequent operations are performed.
540-541: Consistent sleep addition after update operationThis change mirrors the previous sleep addition, ensuring consistent behavior by allowing time for data propagation after update operations as well. This approach helps maintain data consistency across the distributed system.
555-556: Consistent error reporting enhancementThis change continues the pattern of improved error reporting by including the error code in the message. This consistency across different test cases enhances the overall debugging experience.
576-577: Minor formatting improvementThis small change in error message formatting enhances consistency and readability throughout the test file.
622-623: Comprehensive error reporting improvementThese changes complete the pattern of enhanced error reporting across different operations (Remove, Upsert) by consistently including error codes in the messages. This comprehensive approach significantly improves the debugging capabilities throughout the test suite.
Also applies to: 658-659, 709-710
Line range hint
1-1000: Overall improvement in test reliability and debuggabilityThe changes made to this file significantly enhance the test suite in two main areas:
- Error Reporting: Consistent inclusion of error codes in error messages across various operations improves debuggability.
- Timing Control: Addition of sleep periods after insert and update operations ensures proper data propagation in distributed systems.
These improvements increase the reliability of the tests and make debugging easier without altering the core functionality of the test cases. The changes are well-implemented and consistent throughout the file.
internal/net/grpc/client.go (2)
Line range hint
171-186: Comprehensive error handling and monitoring logicThe error handling and monitoring logic in this section are well-structured and cover various scenarios:
- Context cancellation and deadline exceeded errors are properly handled.
- Circuit breaker open state is accounted for.
- Specific gRPC client connection errors are caught and logged.
- Non-critical errors are logged as warnings to avoid unnecessary error propagation.
This robust error handling ensures that the connection monitor can gracefully handle various failure scenarios while maintaining detailed logging for debugging purposes.
Line range hint
1-1191: Overall assessment: Well-implemented changes with minor improvement suggestionsThe changes made to the gRPC client implementation, particularly in the
StartConnectionMonitormethod, represent a shift towards non-blocking connection attempts. This change can potentially improve responsiveness but also introduces some risks that are largely mitigated by the existing robust error handling and health check mechanisms.Key points:
- The removal of
grpc.WithBlock()inStartConnectionMonitoris the main change.- Existing error handling is comprehensive and well-structured.
- Health checks and connection management logic provide safeguards against issues with unestablished connections.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding connection readiness checks after non-blocking connection attempts.
- For consistency, consider adding a non-blocking option to the
Connectmethod.Overall, the changes are well-implemented, and the file demonstrates good practices in error handling and connection management for a gRPC client.
go.mod (4)
Line range hint
352-421: New dependencies and significant updates in require statements
New dependencies added:
buf.build/gen/go/bufbuild/protovalidate/protocolbuffers/go v1.34.2-20240920164238-5a7b106cbb87.2(line 352)github.com/planetscale/vtprotobuf v0.6.1-0.20240319094008-0393e58bdf10(line 383)github.com/unum-cloud/usearch/golang v0.0.0-20240828190432-b9a9758a06e1(line 386)Significant updates to existing dependencies:
google.golang.org/grpc v1.67.0(line 411)google.golang.org/protobuf v1.34.2(line 412)k8s.io/api v0.30.3(line 415)k8s.io/apimachinery v0.30.3(line 416)k8s.io/client-go v0.30.3(line 418)These changes may introduce new functionality or improve existing features. However, they may also require code changes to accommodate new APIs or behaviors.
To ensure the new dependencies are properly integrated and the updated ones don't cause any issues, please run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Update and tidy the module dependencies go mod tidy # Verify that the project builds successfully with the new and updated dependencies go build ./... # Run tests to check for any breaking changes or integration issues go test ./...
426-429: Updates to indirect dependenciesSeveral indirect dependencies have been updated, including:
Google Cloud packages:
cloud.google.com/go/auth v0.9.5(line 426)cloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata v0.5.2(line 428)Golang packages:
golang.org/x/xerrors v0.0.0-20240903120638-7835f813f4da(line 515)Google API:
google.golang.org/api v0.197.0(line 517)While these updates to indirect dependencies may not directly affect the project's code, they can impact the overall stability and security of the project. These updates likely include bug fixes and security patches.
To ensure that the updated indirect dependencies don't introduce any conflicts or issues, please run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Update and tidy the module dependencies go mod tidy # Verify that the project builds successfully with the updated indirect dependencies go build ./... # Run tests to check for any potential issues go test ./... # Optional: Run a security scan to check for any known vulnerabilities in the dependencies # Uncomment the following line if you have a security scanning tool installed # go list -m all | xargs go-security-scannerAlso applies to: 515-517
Line range hint
1-528: Summary of dependency updates and recommendationsThis update to the
go.modfile includes significant changes to various dependencies:
- Major version updates to core libraries (e.g., Google Cloud, AWS SDK, gRPC)
- Addition of new dependencies (e.g., protovalidate, vtprotobuf, usearch)
- Updates to many indirect dependencies
These changes can potentially improve the project's functionality, performance, and security. However, they also carry risks such as breaking changes, compatibility issues, and the need for code adjustments.
Recommendations:
- Carefully review the changelog or release notes for each major dependency update to understand any breaking changes or new features that may affect your code.
- Update your code to accommodate any API changes or new best practices introduced by the updated dependencies.
- Thoroughly test the entire project, including all edge cases and integration points, to ensure that the updates haven't introduced any regressions or unexpected behaviors.
- Consider updating your CI/CD pipeline to include compatibility checks with the new dependency versions.
- Keep an eye on the project's performance metrics after deploying these changes, as dependency updates can sometimes have unforeseen impacts on performance.
- Ensure that all team members are aware of these dependency updates and any resulting code changes that may affect their work.
To ensure a smooth transition with the updated dependencies, please run the following comprehensive check:
#!/bin/bash # Update and tidy the module dependencies go mod tidy # Verify that the project builds successfully go build ./... # Run all tests go test ./... -v # Run tests with race condition detection go test -race ./... # Optional: Run a security scan (uncomment if you have a security scanning tool) # go list -m all | xargs go-security-scanner # Optional: Run a static code analysis tool (uncomment if you have golangci-lint installed) # golangci-lint run echo "If all checks pass, the dependency updates are likely safe to merge."
Line range hint
7-22: Significant updates to major dependenciesSeveral major dependencies have been updated to newer versions. Notable changes include:
Cloud Google packages (lines 7-17):
cloud.google.com/go/bigqueryto v1.63.0cloud.google.com/go/computeto v1.28.1cloud.google.com/go/iamto v1.2.1cloud.google.com/go/kmsto v1.20.0cloud.google.com/go/monitoringto v1.21.1cloud.google.com/go/secretmanagerto v1.14.1cloud.google.com/go/traceto v1.11.1AWS SDK packages (lines 48-68):
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2to v1.31.0- Various AWS service packages updated
Google packages (lines 317-322):
google.golang.org/apito v0.199.0google.golang.org/genprotoand related packages to v0.0.0-20240924160255-9d4c2d233b61google.golang.org/grpcto v1.67.0These updates likely include bug fixes, performance improvements, and new features. However, they may also introduce breaking changes or compatibility issues.
To ensure compatibility with the updated dependencies, please run the following commands:
Also applies to: 48-68, 317-322
charts/vald/values.yaml (4)
1078-1085: Improved deployment process with new initContainersThe addition of two initContainers for the gateway.lb component enhances the deployment process:
- They ensure that the discoverer and agent components are ready before the gateway starts.
- The use of the lightweight busybox:stable image is appropriate for these wait operations.
- Setting imagePullPolicy to Always ensures the latest version of the image is used.
These changes will lead to a more robust and reliable deployment sequence.
1362-1365: Consistent improvement in deployment sequence for gateway.filterThe addition of an initContainer for the gateway.filter component further enhances the deployment process:
- It ensures that the gateway-lb component is ready before the filter starts.
- The use of the busybox:stable image and imagePullPolicy: Always is consistent with the previous initContainers.
This change maintains the improved robustness and reliability of the deployment sequence across components.
3140-3147: Consistent deployment improvements extended to manager.indexThe addition of two initContainers for the manager.index component further enhances the overall deployment process:
- They ensure that the agent and discoverer components are ready before the manager.index starts.
- The configuration is identical to the gateway.lb initContainers, maintaining consistency across the deployment.
- This change reinforces the improved robustness and reliability of the deployment sequence.
The consistent approach across components will lead to a more predictable and stable deployment process.
3302-3309: Comprehensive deployment sequence improvements across all componentsThe addition of initContainers to the manager.index.corrector and manager.index.creator components completes a systematic enhancement of the deployment process:
- All major components (gateway.lb, gateway.filter, manager.index, manager.index.corrector, and manager.index.creator) now have initContainers to ensure their dependencies are ready before starting.
- The configuration is consistent across all components, using busybox:stable images and waiting for the appropriate dependencies.
- This uniform approach ensures a more reliable and predictable deployment sequence throughout the entire Vald system.
These changes collectively result in a more robust, consistent, and maintainable deployment process. The systematic nature of these improvements will likely reduce deployment-related issues and simplify troubleshooting.
Also applies to: 3414-3421
versions/actions/GITHUB_ISSUE_METRICS (1)
1-1: Upgrade toGITHUB_ISSUE_METRICSversion 3.12.0 approvedUpdating to version 3.12.0 is a good practice to keep dependencies current. Please ensure that all workflows using this action remain compatible and function correctly with the new version.
Run the following script to identify workflows that use
GITHUB_ISSUE_METRICS:dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile (1)
48-48: Addition ofRUSTUP_HOMEenvironment variable is appropriateDefining
RUSTUP_HOMEensures thatrustupoperates correctly by specifying its home directory. This addition aligns with the existing Rust environment configuration and should facilitate proper toolchain management.internal/net/grpc/pool/pool.go (2)
Line range hint
472-486: Duplicate Issue: Incorrect use ofgrpc.NewClientThe function
grpc.NewClientis used again at lines 472-486. As previously mentioned,grpc.NewClientdoes not exist in thegrpcpackage. Ensure that you usegrpc.Dialorgrpc.DialContextto establish client connections.
Line range hint
700-706: Duplicate Issue: Incorrect functiongrpc.NewClientusedAt lines 700-706,
grpc.NewClientis called to create a gRPC client connection. This function is not part of thegrpcpackage. Please verify and replace it with the appropriate gRPC dialing function.internal/net/grpc/status/status.go (1)
Line range hint
794-813: Ensure sensitive information is not loggedIn the
Logfunction, errors are logged based on their gRPC status codes. Logging error messages directly might inadvertently expose sensitive information, especially forcodes.Internalandcodes.DataLoss:log.Error(err.Error())Consider reviewing the logged messages to ensure they do not include sensitive data. Implementing error message sanitization or logging less detailed error information in production environments can mitigate potential security risks.
[security]
Makefile (3)
668-668: Build Faiss without GPU supportThe addition of
-DFAISS_ENABLE_GPU=OFFensures that Faiss is built without GPU support. This is appropriate if GPU capabilities are not required or available.
682-706: Implementation of usearch installation from sourceThe new
usearch/installtarget correctly builds usearch from source using CMake with specified options. This approach provides better control over the build configuration and enables specific features like FP16 support and OpenMP.
702-705: Verify the installation paths and library namesEnsure that the copied library files and headers are placed in the correct directories and that the naming conventions match the expectations of the build and linking processes. This is important for the proper functioning of dependent components.
.gitfiles (9)
76-76: Addition of CodeQL Analysis WorkflowIncluding
.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.ymlenhances the project's security posture by automating code scanning for vulnerabilities. Ensure that the workflow is correctly configured to cover all relevant languages and directories.
170-171: Generated Protobuf Files formetaServiceThe files
apis/grpc/v1/meta/meta.pb.goandapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta_vtproto.pb.gohave been generated for the newmetaservice. Confirm that these files are up-to-date and accurately reflect the definitions inmeta.proto.
208-208: New Protobuf Definition:meta.protoThe addition of
apis/proto/v1/meta/meta.protointroduces themetaservice definitions. Please ensure that:
- The service and message definitions follow protobuf best practices.
- Field numbers are correctly assigned and there are no duplicates.
- Proper documentation is included for each service and message.
226-226: Addition of Swagger Documentation formetaServiceThe file
apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.jsonprovides API documentation for themetaservice. Ensure that it is generated from the latestmeta.protoand properly reflects all available endpoints and models.
1034-1034: Addition of Error Handling forusearchModuleThe file
internal/errors/usearch.gocontains error definitions specific to theusearchmodule. Ensure that:
- All potential errors in
usearchare comprehensively covered.- Error messages are clear and actionable.
- There is consistency with error handling patterns used elsewhere in the project.
1946-1946: Generated Rust Protobuf Code formetaThe file
rust/libs/proto/src/meta.v1.tonic.rshas been generated for themetaservice. Verify that it matches the latestmeta.protodefinitions and that no manual modifications have been made.
2002-2002: Update toUSEARCH_VERSIONThe
versions/USEARCH_VERSIONfile has been added or updated. Ensure that:
- The version specified is consistent with the
usearchlibrary used in the codebase.- Any dependencies or documentation referencing
USEARCH_VERSIONare updated accordingly.
1922-1925: Introduction of RustmetaComponentA new Rust component has been added for the
metaservice:
rust/bin/meta/Cargo.toml: Defines the package dependencies and metadata.rust/bin/meta/src/handler.rsandrust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs: Implement the request handlers.rust/bin/meta/src/main.rs: Serves as the entry point for the application.Run the following script to confirm that the
metacomponent is included in the Rust workspace:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'meta' is listed as a member in the Cargo workspace. # Expected result: 'bin/meta' should appear under the [workspace] members. grep -A 5 '\[workspace\]' rust/Cargo.toml | grep 'members' -A 5 | grep 'bin/meta'
889-891: Implementation of theusearchAlgorithm ModuleThe new algorithm module in
internal/core/algorithm/usearchaddsusearchsupport. Please verify:
- The implementation aligns with project coding standards.
- The
option.gocorrectly handles all configurable parameters.- Comprehensive unit tests are provided in
usearch_test.go.Run the following script to ensure that the
usearchmodule is referenced appropriately in the codebase:pkg/gateway/lb/handler/grpc/handler.go (1)
1751-1751: Verify handling of zero timestampsThe condition at line 1751 has been changed to
if req.GetConfig().GetTimestamp() > 0 {. This modification means that ifTimestampis zero, the code will now execute theelseblock, potentially setting the timestamp to the current time. Please ensure that this change is intentional and that scenarios whereTimestampis zero are handled appropriately.To check for instances where the
Timestampmight be set to zero intentionally, run the following script:✅ Verification successful
Verified handling of zero timestamps
No instances of
Timestampbeing set to zero were found in the codebase. The change in the condition toif req.GetConfig().GetTimestamp() > 0is intentional and appropriately handles scenarios whereTimestampis zero.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for occurrences where Timestamp is explicitly set to zero in the codebase. rg --type go --fixed-strings 'Timestamp: 0' -A 5Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for assignments where Timestamp is set to zero in Go codebase. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'$_Timestamp = 0'Length of output: 48
| - Docker Version: v27.3.1 | ||
| - Kubernetes Version: v1.31.1 | ||
| - Helm Version: v3.16.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider a more maintainable approach for version numbers in templates
While updating the version numbers for Docker, Kubernetes, and Helm is good for keeping the template current, there are a couple of points to consider:
-
The Vald version (v1.7.13) hasn't been updated, although the PR objectives mention refactoring for release v1.7.14. This inconsistency might lead to confusion.
-
Frequently updating version numbers in issue templates can become a maintenance burden and may lead to outdated information if not regularly maintained.
Consider the following approaches:
-
Use placeholder text for versions that change frequently, e.g.,
Docker Version: vX.Y.Z. This allows users to fill in the current version when reporting an issue. -
Alternatively, if you want to keep specific versions, implement an automated process to update these templates when new releases are made.
-
Update the Vald version to v1.7.14 to align with the PR objectives, or clarify why it should remain at v1.7.13.
Example of using placeholder text:
- Docker Version: v27.3.1
- Kubernetes Version: v1.31.1
- Helm Version: v3.16.1
+ Docker Version: vX.Y.Z
+ Kubernetes Version: vX.Y.Z
+ Helm Version: vX.Y.ZThis approach would reduce the need for frequent updates to the template while still prompting users to provide their specific environment details.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api v0.0.0-20240814211410-ddb44dafa142 // indirect | ||
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240903143218-8af14fe29dc1 // indirect |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Version inconsistency detected in genproto packages.
There's a discrepancy between the versions specified in the replace directives and those in the require section for the google.golang.org/genproto packages:
- Replace directive:
v0.0.0-20240924160255-9d4c2d233b61 - Require section:
- googleapis/api:
v0.0.0-20240814211410-ddb44dafa142 - googleapis/rpc:
v0.0.0-20240903143218-8af14fe29dc1
- googleapis/api:
To ensure consistency and prevent potential issues, consider aligning these versions.
Suggestion: Update lines 39-40 to match the version in the replace directives:
- google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api v0.0.0-20240814211410-ddb44dafa142 // indirect
- google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240903143218-8af14fe29dc1 // indirect
+ google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api v0.0.0-20240924160255-9d4c2d233b61 // indirect
+ google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240924160255-9d4c2d233b61 // indirect📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api v0.0.0-20240814211410-ddb44dafa142 // indirect | |
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240903143218-8af14fe29dc1 // indirect | |
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api v0.0.0-20240924160255-9d4c2d233b61 // indirect | |
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240924160255-9d4c2d233b61 // indirect |
| - path: "/" | ||
| backend: | ||
| service: | ||
| name: vald-lb-gateway | ||
| port: | ||
| name: grpc | ||
| pathType: ImplementationSpecific | ||
| - path: "/grpc.reflection.v1alpha.ServerReflection/ServerReflectionInfo" | ||
| backend: | ||
| service: | ||
| name: vald-lb-gateway | ||
| port: | ||
| name: grpc | ||
| pathType: ImplementationSpecific | ||
| - path: "/grpc.reflection.v1.ServerReflection/ServerReflectionInfo" | ||
| backend: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove Unused gRPC Reflection Paths from Ingress Configuration
The Ingress configuration includes paths for both v1alpha and v1 gRPC reflection APIs. However, the codebase does not actively use either grpc.reflection.v1alpha or grpc.reflection.v1.
Consider removing the following unnecessary paths:
/grpc.reflection.v1alpha.ServerReflection/ServerReflectionInfo/grpc.reflection.v1.ServerReflection/ServerReflectionInfo
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify API versioning strategy and necessity of all paths.
The Ingress configuration now includes three paths: root, v1alpha reflection, and v1 reflection. While this setup provides good coverage and backward compatibility, it's worth verifying if all these paths are necessary and align with the project's API versioning strategy.
Consider the following:
- Is there a plan to deprecate the v1alpha reflection API in the future?
- Are there any clients still relying on the v1alpha reflection API?
- Does the root path configuration conflict with any other services or ingress rules?
To help with this verification, you can run the following script to check for usage of these reflection APIs in the codebase:
This will help determine if both API versions are actively used in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of gRPC reflection APIs in the codebase
echo "Checking for v1alpha reflection API usage:"
rg --type go "grpc.reflection.v1alpha" -C 3
echo "Checking for v1 reflection API usage:"
rg --type go "grpc.reflection.v1" -C 3
echo "Checking for general reflection setup:"
rg --type go "reflection.Register" -C 3
Length of output: 1010
| client, err := c.getClient() | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return client.IndexInfo(ctx, &payload.Empty{}) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider the implications of removing the context parameter.
The removal of the ctx context.Context parameter from IndexInfo follows the pattern seen in other functions. While this simplifies the API, it may reduce flexibility in controlling the operation's lifecycle.
Consider implementing a timeout-aware version of this function:
func (c *client) IndexInfoWithTimeout(t *testing.T, timeout time.Duration) (*payload.Info_Index_Count, error) {
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), timeout)
defer cancel()
client, err := c.getClient()
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return client.IndexInfo(ctx, &payload.Empty{})
}| ENV RUSTUP_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/rustup | ||
| ENV PATH=${CARGO_HOME}/bin:${GOPATH}/bin:${GOROOT}/bin:${RUSTUP_HOME}/bin:/usr/local/bin:${PATH} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary inclusion of ${RUSTUP_HOME}/bin from PATH
The rustup and cargo executables are located in ${CARGO_HOME}/bin, not ${RUSTUP_HOME}/bin. Including ${RUSTUP_HOME}/bin in the PATH is unnecessary and may lead to confusion.
Apply this diff to update the PATH:
ENV CARGO_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/cargo
ENV RUSTUP_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/rustup
-ENV PATH=${CARGO_HOME}/bin:${GOPATH}/bin:${GOROOT}/bin:${RUSTUP_HOME}/bin:/usr/local/bin:${PATH}
+ENV PATH=${CARGO_HOME}/bin:${GOPATH}/bin:${GOROOT}/bin:/usr/local/bin:${PATH}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ENV RUSTUP_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/rustup | |
| ENV PATH=${CARGO_HOME}/bin:${GOPATH}/bin:${GOROOT}/bin:${RUSTUP_HOME}/bin:/usr/local/bin:${PATH} | |
| ENV RUSTUP_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/rustup | |
| ENV PATH=${CARGO_HOME}/bin:${GOPATH}/bin:${GOROOT}/bin:/usr/local/bin:${PATH} |
| func removeDuplicatesFromTSVLine(line string) string { | ||
| fields := strings.Split(line, "\t") | ||
| uniqueFields := make(map[string]bool) | ||
| result := make([]string, 0, len(fields)) | ||
| for _, field := range fields { | ||
| if !uniqueFields[field] { | ||
| uniqueFields[field] = true | ||
| result = append(result, field) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return strings.Join(result, "\t") | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize removeDuplicatesFromTSVLine function
The removeDuplicatesFromTSVLine function can be optimized for performance and clarity:
- Instead of using a
map[string]bool, consider using amap[string]struct{}to save memory. - Trim whitespace from fields to prevent logical duplicates with leading/trailing spaces.
- Handle empty strings or cases with multiple consecutive tabs to avoid including empty fields as unique entries.
An optimized version might look like:
func removeDuplicatesFromTSVLine(line string) string {
fields := strings.Split(line, "\t")
uniqueFields := make(map[string]struct{})
result := make([]string, 0, len(fields))
for _, field := range fields {
field = strings.TrimSpace(field)
if field == "" {
continue
}
if _, exists := uniqueFields[field]; !exists {
uniqueFields[field] = struct{}{}
result = append(result, field)
}
}
return strings.Join(result, "\t")
}| cp $(TEMP_DIR)/usearch-$(USEARCH_VERSION)/build/libusearch_static_c.a $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_c.a | ||
| cp $(TEMP_DIR)/usearch-$(USEARCH_VERSION)/build/libusearch_static_c.a $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_static_c.a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Redundant copying of static library file
The static library libusearch_static_c.a is being copied to both $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_c.a and $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_static_c.a. Unless both filenames are required for compatibility reasons, this duplication may be unnecessary.
Consider removing one of the copy commands to eliminate redundancy:
cp $(TEMP_DIR)/usearch-$(USEARCH_VERSION)/build/libusearch_static_c.a $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_c.a
-cp $(TEMP_DIR)/usearch-$(USEARCH_VERSION)/build/libusearch_static_c.a $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_static_c.a📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| cp $(TEMP_DIR)/usearch-$(USEARCH_VERSION)/build/libusearch_static_c.a $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_c.a | |
| cp $(TEMP_DIR)/usearch-$(USEARCH_VERSION)/build/libusearch_static_c.a $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_static_c.a | |
| cp $(TEMP_DIR)/usearch-$(USEARCH_VERSION)/build/libusearch_static_c.a $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_c.a |
| @@ -699,6 +699,7 @@ initContainers | |||
| {{- if .type }} | |||
| - name: {{ .name }} | |||
| image: {{ .image }} | |||
| imagePullPolicy: {{ .imagePullPolicy }} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Several container definitions are missing imagePullPolicy
The following containers do not have imagePullPolicy set:
vdaas/vald-loadtest:nightlyvdaas/vald-helm-operator:v1.7.13vdaas/vald-benchmark-operator:v1.7.13prom/prometheusprofefe/kprofefe:latestjaegertracing/jaeger-agentprofefe/profefe:latestgrafana/loki:2.0.0grafana/grafanabusybox:stablevdaas/vald-index-save:nightlyvdaas/vald-manager-index:nightlyvdaas/vald-mirror-gateway:nightlyvdaas/vald-index-correction:nightlyvdaas/vald-lb-gateway:nightlyvdaas/vald-index-operator:nightlyvdaas/vald-agent-ngt:nightlyminio/mcminio/miniovdaas/vald-discoverer-k8s:nightlycassandra:latest
Please ensure that imagePullPolicy is specified for all container definitions to maintain consistent image pulling behavior.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify that imagePullPolicy is set for all container definitions
The addition of imagePullPolicy to the initContainers is a good practice to ensure consistent image pulling behavior. To maintain consistency across the deployment, please verify that all container definitions in the Helm charts have the imagePullPolicy specified. This helps prevent potential issues with image caching and ensures that the correct image versions are used.
Run the following script to find any container definitions without imagePullPolicy set:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all container definitions in Helm templates that do not have `imagePullPolicy` specified.
# Expected result: No output implies all containers have `imagePullPolicy` set.
# Command:
rg --no-filename -A 5 '(containers:|initContainers:)' --type yaml \
| rg -A 5 'image:' \
| rg -B 5 -A 5 '(containers:|initContainers:)' \
| rg -v 'imagePullPolicy:'
Length of output: 10969
| client, err := c.getClient() | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return err |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated client initialization across methods
The initialization of the client object using client, err := c.getClient() along with the error handling is repeated in multiple methods. This leads to code duplication and can make maintenance more challenging.
Consider refactoring this repeated code into a separate helper method or struct embedding. For example, you could initialize the client once at the struct level or create a method that encapsulates the client initialization and error handling:
func (c *client) getInitializedClient(t *testing.T) (YourClientType, error) {
client, err := c.getClient()
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("failed to get client: %v", err)
return nil, err
}
return client, nil
}Then, in your methods, you can simplify the client initialization:
-func (c *client) SearchWithParameters(t *testing.T, ctx context.Context, ds Dataset, ...) error {
- client, err := c.getClient()
- if err != nil {
- return err
- }
+func (c *client) SearchWithParameters(t *testing.T, ctx context.Context, ds Dataset, ...) error {
+ client, err := c.getInitializedClient(t)
+ if err != nil {
+ return err
+ }This approach reduces redundancy and improves code readability.
Also applies to: 296-298, 416-418, 534-536, 640-642, 743-745, 847-849, 949-951, 1032-1034, 1050-1052, 1077-1079, 1099-1101
| st := res.GetStatus() | ||
| if st != nil { | ||
| if e := svalidator(t, st.GetCode(), st.GetMessage()); e != nil { | ||
| t.Errorf("an error returned:\tcode: %d\tmessage: %s\tdetails: %s", | ||
| status.GetCode(), | ||
| status.GetMessage(), | ||
| errdetails.Serialize(status.GetDetails())) | ||
| st.GetCode(), | ||
| st.GetMessage(), | ||
| errdetails.Serialize(st.GetDetails())) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Check for potential nil pointer dereference when accessing status details
In the error handling block, when st.GetDetails() is called, there is a possibility that st could be nil if res.GetStatus() returns nil. Although you've checked if st != nil before, it's good practice to ensure that st.GetDetails() won't cause a nil pointer dereference.
Consider adding a nil check for st.GetDetails() before calling errdetails.Serialize(st.GetDetails()):
t.Errorf("an error returned:\tcode: %d\tmessage: %s\tdetails: %s",
st.GetCode(),
st.GetMessage(),
- errdetails.Serialize(st.GetDetails()))
+ errdetails.Serialize(
+ func() []*any.Any {
+ if st.GetDetails() != nil {
+ return st.GetDetails()
+ }
+ return []*any.Any{}
+ }(),
+ ),
)Alternatively, handle the case where st.GetDetails() might be nil inside errdetails.Serialize.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| st := res.GetStatus() | |
| if st != nil { | |
| if e := svalidator(t, st.GetCode(), st.GetMessage()); e != nil { | |
| t.Errorf("an error returned:\tcode: %d\tmessage: %s\tdetails: %s", | |
| status.GetCode(), | |
| status.GetMessage(), | |
| errdetails.Serialize(status.GetDetails())) | |
| st.GetCode(), | |
| st.GetMessage(), | |
| errdetails.Serialize(st.GetDetails())) | |
| st := res.GetStatus() | |
| if st != nil { | |
| if e := svalidator(t, st.GetCode(), st.GetMessage()); e != nil { | |
| t.Errorf("an error returned:\tcode: %d\tmessage: %s\tdetails: %s", | |
| st.GetCode(), | |
| st.GetMessage(), | |
| errdetails.Serialize( | |
| func() []*any.Any { | |
| if st.GetDetails() != nil { | |
| return st.GetDetails() | |
| } | |
| return []*any.Any{} | |
| }(), | |
| )) |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/v1.7 #2648 +/- ##
===============================================
Coverage ? 24.29%
===============================================
Files ? 537
Lines ? 46950
Branches ? 0
===============================================
Hits ? 11405
Misses ? 34764
Partials ? 781 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 36
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (46)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security_issue_report.md (1)
22-24: LGTM! Consider adding a comment about version updates.The version updates for Docker, Kubernetes, and Helm are appropriate and align with the PR objectives. These minor version increments help keep the environment information current for security issue reports.
Consider adding a comment above the "Environment" section to remind contributors to update these versions when submitting reports. For example:
### Environment <!-- Please update the versions below to match your environment -->This addition could help ensure that the reported environment details are always up-to-date.
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md (1)
28-30: LGTM! Consider adding a comment about version requirements.The updates to Docker, Kubernetes, and Helm versions are appropriate and align with the template's purpose of gathering accurate environment information for bug reports.
Consider adding a comment above the environment section to clarify whether these are minimum required versions or just the latest tested versions. This can help users understand if they need to update their environment before reporting a bug. For example:
### Environment <!-- Please provide your environment information. The versions below are the latest tested versions. -->k8s/metrics/profefe/cronjob.yaml (2)
33-33: LGTM! Consider the trade-offs ofimagePullPolicy: AlwaysThe change to
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysensures that the latest version of thekprofefeimage is always used, which aligns with the PR objectives. This is beneficial for frequently updated images or in development environments.However, be aware of potential trade-offs:
- Increased network usage due to frequent image pulls.
- Possible slower pod startup times, especially with large images or slow networks.
- Increased load on the container registry.
For production environments, consider if
IfNotPresentmight be more suitable, especially if image updates are infrequent and controlled.
Line range hint
1-40: Consider adjustments for improved stability and resource managementWhile the current configuration is functional, consider the following suggestions for improved stability and resource management:
Image versioning: Replace
profefe/kprofefe:latestwith a specific version tag (e.g.,profefe/kprofefe:v1.2.3). This ensures consistency and predictability across deployments.Scheduling frequency: The current schedule (
*/3 * * * *) runs the job every 3 minutes. Combined withimagePullPolicy: Always, this might lead to excessive resource usage. Consider if this frequency is necessary for your profiling needs.Concurrency policy: The
Replacepolicy might lead to incomplete profiling data if jobs frequently overlap. If complete profiling data is crucial, consider using theForbidpolicy instead.Could you provide more context on the profiling requirements? This would help in determining if the current schedule and concurrency policy are optimal for your use case.
k8s/gateway/gateway/ing.yaml (1)
Line range hint
41-60: LGTM: Overall Ingress configuration is well-structured.The Ingress configuration is consistent and well-structured. All paths correctly use the same backend service and pathType, which is appropriate for a load balancer gateway.
Consider adding annotations for specific Ingress controller optimizations. For example, if you're using NGINX Ingress Controller, you might want to add:
metadata: annotations: nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/ssl-redirect: "false" nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/force-ssl-redirect: "false" nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/backend-protocol: "GRPC"These annotations can help optimize the Ingress for gRPC traffic and control SSL redirection behavior.
k8s/metrics/pyroscope/base/deployment.yaml (1)
Line range hint
72-72: Add resource limits and requestsThe current configuration does not specify any resource limits or requests for the Pyroscope container. This could potentially lead to resource contention issues in your Kubernetes cluster.
Consider adding resource limits and requests to ensure proper resource allocation and prevent potential performance issues. For example:
resources: limits: cpu: "1" memory: "1Gi" requests: cpu: "500m" memory: "512Mi"Adjust these values based on your specific requirements and the expected resource usage of Pyroscope in your environment.
dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
1-91: Overall impact is positive, with a minor suggestion for improvementThe addition of the
CARGO_HOMEenvironment variable enhances the Rust configuration in this Dockerfile without disrupting the existing structure or build process. This change is consistent with the PR's objectives and improves the clarity of the Rust environment setup.For improved consistency and maintainability, consider grouping all Rust-related environment variables together. You could move the
CARGO_HOMEdefinition right after theRUSTUP_HOMEdefinition.Here's a suggested reordering of the environment variables for better grouping:
ENV REPO=vald ENV RUST_HOME=/usr/local/lib/rust -ENV TZ=Etc/UTC -ENV USER=root ENV RUSTUP_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/rustup +ENV CARGO_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/cargo +ENV PATH=${CARGO_HOME}/bin:${RUSTUP_HOME}/bin:/usr/local/bin:${PATH} +ENV TZ=Etc/UTC +ENV USER=root -ENV CARGO_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/cargo -ENV PATH=${CARGO_HOME}/bin:${RUSTUP_HOME}/bin:/usr/local/bin:${PATH}This grouping makes the Rust-specific configurations more apparent and easier to maintain in the future.
dockers/dev/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
52-145: LGTM: Improved development environment setup with minor suggestionThe changes to the RUN command block are well-structured and improve the development environment setup. Notable improvements include:
- Addition of new development tools and languages (e.g., Node.js).
- Use of
--no-install-recommendsto keep the image size down.- Proper cleanup commands to reduce the final image size.
These changes enhance the capabilities of the development container while maintaining good Docker practices.
Consider grouping related installations together for better readability. For example, you could group all Go-related installations, all Rust-related installations, etc. This would make the Dockerfile easier to maintain and understand.
k8s/index/job/save/cronjob.yaml (1)
Line range hint
82-82: Approved: AddedimagePullPolicy: Alwaysto vald-index-save containerThis change ensures that the latest version of the
vdaas/vald-index-save:nightlyimage is always pulled, which is crucial for a nightly build to incorporate the latest changes.Consider using a specific version tag instead of
nightlyfor production deployments to have better control over the exact version being deployed. This can be managed through your CI/CD pipeline to update the tag with each release.k8s/index/job/creation/cronjob.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-156: Summary of changes and their impactThe modifications in this file are focused on setting
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor both init containers (wait-for-agentandwait-for-discoverer). These changes ensure that the latest versions of the init container images are always pulled, which can be beneficial for maintaining up-to-date configurations.However, it's important to consider the following:
- Increased startup time: Always pulling images may lead to longer startup times for the CronJob pods.
- Higher network usage: Frequent image pulls can result in increased network traffic.
- Potential for inconsistency: If the image tagged as "latest" changes frequently, it might lead to inconsistent behavior across different job runs.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Evaluate whether
Alwaysis the most appropriate policy for your production environment.IfNotPresentmight be a good balance between freshness and performance.- Implement a strategy for versioning your init container images to maintain better control over which versions are used.
- Monitor the impact of this change on your cluster's performance and adjust as necessary.
- Ensure that your CI/CD pipeline is aligned with this image pulling strategy to avoid potential issues with image availability or version mismatches.
k8s/metrics/loki/promtail.yaml (1)
43-43: Approved: imagePullPolicy set to Always, but consider using a specific image tag.The change to
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysensures that the latest Promtail image is always pulled, which aligns with the refactoring objectives for the new release. This will help maintain consistency across all nodes in the cluster.However, for production environments, it's recommended to use specific image tags rather than relying on the "latest" tag. This provides better version control and stability. Consider updating the image specification to include a specific tag, like this:
image: grafana/promtail:v2.7.4 # Replace with the desired version imagePullPolicy: AlwaysThis approach combines the benefits of always pulling the image with the stability of a known, tested version.
docs/user-guides/filtering-configuration.md (1)
156-156: Ignore linter warning for hard tabs in Go code blocksThe Markdownlint tool has flagged a hard tab issue at this line. However, this is a false positive as the line is within a Go code block. In Go, hard tabs are the standard for indentation.
To prevent future false positives, consider adding a Markdownlint configuration file (
.markdownlint.jsonor.markdownlint.yaml) to your project root with the following content:{ "no-hard-tabs": { "code_blocks": false } }This configuration will instruct Markdownlint to ignore hard tabs within code blocks, which is appropriate for Go code snippets.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
156-156: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
k8s/gateway/gateway/mirror/deployment.yaml (1)
58-58: LGTM! Consider usingIfNotPresentfor stable images.The addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto thewait-for-gateway-lbinit container is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. This ensures that the latest version of thebusybox:stableimage is always pulled, maintaining consistency across environments.However, for stable tagged images like
busybox:stable, consider usingimagePullPolicy: IfNotPresentinstead. This can potentially improve pod startup times while still ensuring up-to-date images in most scenarios.If you decide to change the policy, you can apply the following diff:
- imagePullPolicy: Always + imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresenttests/e2e/operation/operation.go (5)
Line range hint
153-163: Consider the implications of removing the context parameter.The removal of the
ctx context.Contextparameter from theCreateIndexmethod signature may impact the ability to cancel the operation or set deadlines. This change could affect the behavior of the e2e tests, especially in scenarios where timeouts or cancellations are crucial.Consider keeping the context parameter to maintain consistency with Go's context usage patterns and to allow for proper cancellation and timeout handling in e2e tests.
Line range hint
166-174: Consider the implications of removing the context parameter.Similar to the
CreateIndexmethod, the removal of thectx context.Contextparameter from theSaveIndexmethod signature may impact the ability to cancel the operation or set deadlines. This change could affect the behavior of the e2e tests, especially in scenarios where timeouts or cancellations are crucial.Consider keeping the context parameter to maintain consistency with Go's context usage patterns and to allow for proper cancellation and timeout handling in e2e tests.
Line range hint
208-215: Consider the implications of removing the context parameter.The removal of the
ctx context.Contextparameter from thegetAgentClientmethod signature is consistent with the changes in other methods. However, this change may impact the ability to cancel the operation or set deadlines for obtaining the agent client.Consider keeping the context parameter to maintain consistency with Go's context usage patterns and to allow for proper cancellation and timeout handling in e2e tests.
Line range hint
153-215: Overall impact of context parameter removalThe consistent removal of
context.Contextparameters across multiple methods in this file represents a significant change in the e2e testing framework. While this simplifies the method signatures, it also removes important functionality:
- Cancellation: The ability to cancel long-running operations is lost.
- Deadlines: Setting timeouts for operations is no longer possible at the call site.
- Value propagation: Any values stored in the context for tracing or metadata purposes are no longer available.
These changes may impact the robustness and flexibility of the e2e tests, particularly in scenarios involving timeouts, cancellations, or distributed tracing.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Reevaluate the decision to remove context parameters. If possible, retain them to preserve cancellation, deadline, and value propagation capabilities.
- If removing contexts is necessary, ensure that alternative mechanisms for timeout and cancellation are in place, particularly for long-running operations.
- Update the e2e testing documentation to reflect these changes and provide guidance on how to handle timeouts and cancellations in the new implementation.
- Review other parts of the codebase that may be affected by these changes, ensuring consistency across the project.
grpc.NewClientFunction Not Found in CodebaseThe
grpc.NewClientfunction used in thegetGRPCConnmethod does not appear to be defined within the codebase. This may lead to build errors or unexpected behavior.
- Verify Implementation: Ensure that
grpc.NewClientis properly implemented and imported. If it's a custom function, confirm that its implementation aligns with the desired connection behavior.- Check for Typos: Confirm that there are no typographical errors in the function name or its usage.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
185-197: Verify the implications of usinggrpc.NewClientand removing the context parameter.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis significant:
grpc.NewClientis not a standard gRPC function. Ensure it's a custom implementation that handles connection establishment correctly.- Removing the
ctx context.Contextparameter eliminates the ability to cancel the connection establishment or set a timeout.These changes may affect the behavior and reliability of the e2e tests, especially in network-sensitive environments.
Consider the following:
- If
grpc.NewClientis a custom implementation, ensure it provides equivalent functionality togrpc.DialContext, including proper error handling and connection management.- If possible, retain the context parameter to allow for cancellation and timeout control during connection establishment.
To ensure the
grpc.NewClientfunction is properly implemented and imported, run the following command:🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition or import of grpc.NewClient rg --type go 'func NewClient|import.*"grpc"'Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of NewClient in the codebase ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewClient($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 59
k8s/manager/index/deployment.yaml (2)
62-62: LGTM: AddingimagePullPolicy: Alwaysto init container.The addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto thewait-for-agentinit container ensures that the latest version of the image is always pulled. This is good for consistency and keeping the deployment up-to-date.Consider using a specific version tag for the
busyboximage instead ofstableto balance between consistency and performance. For example:image: busybox:1.36.1 imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresentThis approach allows for controlled updates while reducing unnecessary pulls of unchanged images.
Line range hint
1-208: Suggestions for enhancing the overall deployment configuration.The deployment configuration is well-structured and follows many Kubernetes best practices. Here are some suggestions for further improvements:
Consider documenting the purpose of the custom priority class
default-vald-manager-index-priority. This helps other team members understand its significance.Evaluate the need for NetworkPolicies to restrict traffic to and from this pod, enhancing security.
Consider using a ConfigMap for environment variables instead of inline definitions. This can make configuration management more flexible and easier to update.
Example of using a ConfigMap for environment variables:
apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: vald-manager-index-config data: MY_NODE_NAME: ${MY_NODE_NAME} MY_POD_NAME: ${MY_POD_NAME} MY_POD_NAMESPACE: ${MY_POD_NAMESPACE} --- # In the Deployment spec: envFrom: - configMapRef: name: vald-manager-index-configThis approach centralizes configuration and makes it easier to manage environment-specific settings.
example/client/main.go (1)
69-69: Consider using secure credentials for production environmentsWhile the use of
insecure.NewCredentials()is acceptable for testing and development, it's important to ensure that secure credentials are used in production environments.For production deployments, consider implementing secure gRPC connections. This can be done by:
- Using TLS certificates for authentication and encryption.
- Implementing proper credential management for secure communication.
Example of using TLS (replace with actual implementation):
creds, err := credentials.NewClientTLSFromFile(certFile, "") if err != nil { log.Fatalf("Failed to create TLS credentials %v", err) } conn, err := grpc.NewClient(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(creds))Ensure to implement proper error handling and credential management when switching to secure connections.
internal/net/net.go (1)
160-162: Approve the change with a suggestion for improvementThe modification to suppress warnings for missing port errors is a good improvement. It reduces log noise for a common and often expected case, which aligns with the PR's objective of enhancing error handling.
However, to make the code more robust, consider using a custom error type or a sentinel error instead of string matching. This would make the code less fragile in case the underlying error message changes.
Consider refactoring the error check as follows:
- if !errors.Is(err, errors.Errorf("address %s: missing port in address", addr)) { + var missingPortErr *net.AddrError + if !errors.As(err, &missingPortErr) || missingPortErr.Err != "missing port in address" { log.Warnf("failed to parse addr %s\terror: %v", addr, err) }This approach uses
errors.Asto check for a specific error type, making the code more resilient to changes in the underlying error implementation.example/client/mirror/main.go (1)
Line range hint
1-280: General feedback on file structure and potential improvementsThe overall structure of the file is well-organized and provides a good example of how to interact with the Vald cluster. However, there are a few areas where the code could be improved:
Error Handling: Consider implementing more robust error handling throughout the file. Many errors are currently handled by calling
glg.Fatal, which might not be ideal for a production environment.Documentation: While the code is generally well-commented, adding more inline comments explaining the purpose of each major section (e.g., insertion, search, retrieval, removal) would improve readability.
Configuration: Consider moving the hardcoded values (like
insertCountandtestCount) to configuration variables that can be easily adjusted.Logging: The use of
glgfor logging is consistent, but consider implementing structured logging for better log analysis in production environments.Context Management: The
context.Background()is used throughout the file. Consider implementing proper context management with timeouts or cancellation signals for better resource control.These suggestions aim to improve the overall quality and maintainability of the example code. They're not critical for the current PR but could be considered for future improvements.
tests/e2e/crud/crud_faiss_test.go (2)
303-303: Consistent error reporting improvement inTestE2EStandardCRUDThe enhancement to the error message is consistent with the change in
TestE2EUpdateOnly, which is good for maintaining uniformity across test functions.Consider refactoring the error handling logic into a separate function to avoid code duplication. This would make the tests more maintainable and reduce the risk of inconsistencies in future updates. For example:
func assertNotFoundError(t *testing.T, status int32, msg string) error { if status != int32(codes.NotFound) { return errors.Errorf("the returned status is not NotFound: %s,\tcode: %s", msg, status) } t.Logf("received a NotFound error: %s", msg) return nil }Then, you can use this function in both
TestE2EUpdateOnlyandTestE2EStandardCRUD.
Line range hint
1-338: Overall assessment of changes in crud_faiss_test.goThe modifications to error reporting in
TestE2EUpdateOnlyandTestE2EStandardCRUDare beneficial and align with the PR objectives. They improve the clarity of error messages, which will aid in debugging and understanding test failures.To further enhance the test suite, consider adding a test case that specifically checks for the correct handling of error details. This would ensure that the improvements in error reporting are thoroughly validated.
.github/workflows/e2e-profiling.yaml (6)
62-67: LGTM! Consider parameterizing the cron schedule.The new step for deploying Profefe is well-structured and follows good practices. It deploys Profefe, patches the cron job, and waits for the pod to be ready before proceeding.
Consider parameterizing the cron schedule (currently set to "*/1 * * * *") to make it more flexible for different environments or testing scenarios.
Line range hint
69-86: LGTM! Consider grouping environment variables for better readability.The modifications to the E2E CRUD step are good. Specifying
shell: bashensures consistent behavior, and adding theE2E_DATASET_NAMEenvironment variable improves flexibility.Consider grouping related environment variables or adding comments to explain their purpose. This would improve readability and maintainability of the workflow file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
70-70: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:12:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Line range hint
88-102: LGTM! Consider adding error handling and timeout for port-forwarding.The new "Get profiles" step effectively retrieves profiles for various services and types. The use of loops for iteration is efficient.
Consider the following improvements for robustness:
- Add error handling for the curl commands to catch and report any failures.
- Set a timeout for the kubectl port-forward command to prevent indefinite hanging if there's an issue.
- Use a more reliable method to wait for port-forwarding to be ready, such as checking the port availability instead of using a fixed sleep.
Example:
timeout 10s kubectl port-forward deployment/profefe 10100:10100 & for i in {1..10}; do if nc -z localhost 10100; then break fi sleep 1 done
Line range hint
157-171: LGTM! Consider adding error handling and improving the commit message.The new step for uploading to the vald-ci-images repository is well-structured and securely handles authentication.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling for git operations to catch and report any failures.
- Enhance the commit message to include more context, such as the PR number or the reason for the upload.
- Use
set -eat the beginning of the script to exit immediately if any command fails.Example improvement:
set -e # ... existing code ... git commit -m ":robot: Add profiling results for ${GITHUB_SHA::6} from PR #${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}"🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:29: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:44: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:99: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:14: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:25: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:4: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:18: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Line range hint
173-199: LGTM! Consider using GitHub Actions' built-in functions for commenting.The new "Comment" step effectively generates a visual summary of profiling results and posts it as a comment on the PR.
Consider the following improvements:
- Use GitHub Actions' built-in functions for creating PR comments instead of curl. This would be more efficient and less error-prone.
- Add error handling for the curl command if you decide to keep it.
- Consider breaking down the long string concatenation into smaller, more manageable parts for better readability.
Example using GitHub Actions:
- name: Comment PR uses: actions/github-script@v6 with: github-token: ${{secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN}} script: | const fs = require('fs'); const base = `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vdaas-ci/vald-ci-images/main/${context.sha.substring(0, 6)}`; let body = "# Profile Report\n<table>..."; // Generate table as before body += `\n<a href="https://github.com/vdaas-ci/vald-ci-images/tree/main/${context.sha.substring(0, 6)}">other images</a>`; github.rest.issues.createComment({ issue_number: context.issue.number, owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, body: body });🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
174-174: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:24:1: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Line range hint
1-199: Overall, the changes significantly enhance the E2E profiling workflow.The modifications to this workflow file introduce valuable improvements to the E2E profiling process for the Vald project. Key enhancements include:
- Deployment of the Profefe monitoring tool.
- More comprehensive E2E CRUD testing with configurable parameters.
- Automated retrieval and visualization of profiling data.
- Integration with a separate repository for storing profiling results.
- Automated PR commenting with visual summaries of profiling results.
These changes will greatly improve the ability to monitor and analyze performance across different services in the Vald project.
To further enhance this workflow, consider:
- Implementing more robust error handling throughout the script.
- Exploring ways to parallelize some of the profiling and graph generation steps to potentially reduce overall execution time.
- Adding a mechanism to compare profiling results against established baselines or previous runs to quickly identify performance regressions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
70-70: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:12:23: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
pkg/index/job/save/service/indexer_test.go (2)
Line range hint
59-207: Enhanced test coverage with new scenariosThe addition of new test cases significantly improves the coverage of the
Startmethod, especially with the inclusion of gRPC status error handling. This is a valuable improvement to the test suite.However, consider the following suggestions for further enhancement:
The test cases for handling gRPC errors (lines 114-158 and 159-203) are very similar. Consider refactoring these into a single parameterized test to reduce duplication.
Add comments to each test case explaining the specific scenario being tested. This will improve readability and maintainability of the test suite.
Consider using a table-driven test approach for all test cases to make it easier to add new scenarios in the future.
Line range hint
208-729: Consider addressing unimplemented test functionsThere are several unimplemented test functions commented out at the end of the file (e.g.,
TestNew,Test_delDuplicateAddrs,Test_index_StartClient,Test_index_doSaveIndex). To improve code cleanliness and maintainability, consider one of the following actions:
- If these tests are planned for future implementation, add a TODO comment explaining the plan and timeline for implementation.
- If these tests are no longer needed, remove them from the file to reduce clutter.
- If you decide to keep them as templates, consider moving them to a separate file or document to keep the main test file focused on implemented tests.
docs/user-guides/client-api-config.md (3)
49-49: Approve the updated gRPC connection methodThe change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis correct and aligns with the PR objectives. This update removes the usage of the deprecatedDialContextinterface.Consider adding a brief comment or note in the documentation explaining this new method for establishing a gRPC connection, as it might be helpful for users migrating from older versions of Vald.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
49-49: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
473-473: Approve the addition of AggregationAlgorithm and related informationThe changes in the Search service section are comprehensive and valuable:
- The gRPC connection method is updated consistently.
- The new
AggregationAlgorithmenum is added to the Search configuration.- A detailed table describing the different aggregation algorithms is provided.
- The code sample is updated to demonstrate the usage of
AggregationAlgorithm.These updates align with the PR objectives and significantly enhance the documentation.
To further improve the documentation, consider adding a brief guide on how to choose the appropriate algorithm based on the use case. This could help users make informed decisions when configuring their search requests. For example:
"When choosing an aggregation algorithm, consider your specific use case:
- For large-scale deployments with many Agents,
ConcurrentQueueis generally a good choice.- If you have a small number of Agents and a small top-K,
SortSliceorSortPoolSlicemight be more efficient.- For medium-scale deployments with a moderate top-K,
PairingHeapoften provides the best performance.Benchmark your specific workload to determine the optimal algorithm for your use case."
Also applies to: 413-445, 518-518
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
473-473: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
49-49: Consider using spaces instead of tabs in MarkdownThe static analysis tool (Markdownlint) has flagged the use of hard tabs in the code samples. While this doesn't affect the content or functionality of the documentation, using spaces instead of tabs in Markdown files is generally recommended for better compatibility across different Markdown renderers.
Consider replacing the hard tabs with spaces in the code samples throughout the document. This can typically be done automatically by configuring your text editor to use spaces instead of tabs for indentation in Markdown files.
Also applies to: 165-165, 289-289, 473-473, 656-656
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
49-49: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
internal/net/grpc/client.go (1)
Line range hint
168-185: Consider updating the documentation forStartConnectionMonitorWith the removal of
grpc.WithBlock(), the behavior of theStartConnectionMonitormethod has changed from blocking to non-blocking connection establishment. It would be beneficial to update the method's documentation to reflect this change in behavior, especially noting any potential impacts on the caller's assumptions about connection states when the method returns.go.mod (1)
Line range hint
1-3: Invalid Go version specifiedThe Go version specified (1.23.1) is not a valid Go version. As of September 2024, the latest stable version is 1.22.x. Please update to a valid and stable Go version.
Apply this change:
-go 1.23.1 +go 1.22.0charts/vald/values.yaml (1)
3302-3309: Approve: Consistent init container implementation, with a suggestion for improvementThe addition of init containers for the manager.index.corrector and manager.index.creator deployments maintains the consistent approach to dependency management seen in previous components. This ensures proper startup order and reliability across the system.
However, there's an opportunity to reduce code duplication in the future. Consider implementing a template or shared configuration for these common init containers, which could be reused across different components. This would improve maintainability and reduce the risk of inconsistencies.
In future updates, consider implementing a shared configuration or template for init containers. This could be achieved through Helm's named templates or a custom value structure in the values.yaml file. For example:
initContainers: - name: wait-for-agent {{- include "common.wait-for-container" (dict "target" "agent" "image" "busybox:stable" "imagePullPolicy" "Always" "sleepDuration" 2) | nindent 4 }} - name: wait-for-discoverer {{- include "common.wait-for-container" (dict "target" "discoverer" "image" "busybox:stable" "imagePullPolicy" "Always" "sleepDuration" 2) | nindent 4 }}This approach would centralize the configuration and make it easier to maintain consistency across different components.
Also applies to: 3414-3421
internal/net/grpc/errdetails/errdetails.go (1)
57-58: Consider unifying the type prefixes for clarityThe constants
typePrefixandtypePrefixV1are very similar. To improve readability and maintainability, consider unifying them or clearly documenting the difference between them if they serve distinct purposes.internal/net/grpc/pool/pool.go (2)
Line range hint
472-487: Consider refactoring repetitive error handling into a helper functionThe error handling after calling
grpc.NewClientis repetitive across multiple code segments. Extracting this logic into a helper function would improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.Here's how you might implement the helper function:
func closeConnOnError(conn *ClientConn, err error) error { if conn != nil { cerr := conn.Close() if cerr != nil && !errors.Is(cerr, grpc.ErrClientConnClosing) { return errors.Join(err, cerr) } } return err }Apply this change to the code:
conn, err = grpc.NewClient(addr, p.dopts...) if err != nil { - if conn != nil { - cerr := conn.Close() - if cerr != nil && !errors.Is(cerr, grpc.ErrClientConnClosing) { - err = errors.Join(err, cerr) - } - } + err = closeConnOnError(conn, err) log.Debugf("failed to dial gRPC connection to %s,\terror: %v", addr, err) return nil, err }Repeat this refactoring wherever similar error handling occurs.
700-703: Avoid callingconn.Close()within conditional expressionsCalling
conn.Close()inside the conditional statement can lead to side effects that make the code harder to read and maintain. It's better to separate the close operation from the condition to enhance clarity.Refactor the code as follows:
if err == nil && isHealthy(ctx, conn) { cerr := conn.Close() if cerr == nil { // if no error and healthy the port is ready for gRPC return port, nil } }This change improves readability by making side effects explicit.
internal/net/grpc/status/status.go (3)
243-246: InitializedmapConditionallyThe map
dmapis initialized before checking iferrordetailsare provided. If both arenilor empty, initializingdmapis unnecessary.Consider initializing
dmaponly when it's needed to optimize memory usage:if err != nil || len(details) > 0 { dmap := make(map[string][]proto.Message, len(details)+1) // existing logic... }
Line range hint
248-259: Extract Anonymous Function Into a Helper FunctionThe anonymous function used to get the hostname can be extracted for better readability and reusability.
Refactor the code as follows:
func getHostname() string { hostname, err := os.Hostname() if err != nil { log.Warn("failed to fetch hostname:", err) } return hostname } // Usage Domain: getHostname(),
427-430: Iterating Over a Map Without Deterministic OrderWhen iterating over
dmap, remember that map iteration in Go is randomized.If the order of processing matters, consider extracting the keys, sorting them, and then iterating:
keys := make([]string, 0, len(dmap)) for key := range dmap { keys = append(keys, key) } sort.Strings(keys) for _, typeName := range keys { // existing logic... }.gitfiles (1)
76-76: Ensure consistent file extension for workflow filesThe file
.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.ymluses the.ymlextension, while other workflow files use.yaml. For consistency, consider using the.yamlextension for all workflow files.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
apis/grpc/v1/agent/sidecar/sidecar_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goexample/client/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumhack/docker/gen/main.gois excluded by!**/gen/**rust/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (72)
- .gitfiles (9 hunks)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md (1 hunks)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security_issue_report.md (1 hunks)
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/e2e-profiling.yaml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/e2e.yaml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (2 hunks)
- charts/vald/templates/_helpers.tpl (1 hunks)
- charts/vald/values.yaml (7 hunks)
- dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- dockers/dev/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- docs/tutorial/get-started-with-faiss-agent.md (1 hunks)
- docs/tutorial/get-started.md (1 hunks)
- docs/tutorial/vald-agent-standalone-on-k8s.md (1 hunks)
- docs/user-guides/client-api-config.md (5 hunks)
- docs/user-guides/filtering-configuration.md (1 hunks)
- example/client/agent/main.go (1 hunks)
- example/client/go.mod (2 hunks)
- example/client/main.go (1 hunks)
- example/client/mirror/main.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (13 hunks)
- internal/core/algorithm/usearch/usearch_test.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/dialer.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/client.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/codes/codes.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/errdetails/errdetails.go (2 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/interceptor/server/logging/accesslog.go (5 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/pool/pool.go (4 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/pool/pool_bench_test.go (2 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/status/status.go (4 hunks)
- internal/net/net.go (1 hunks)
- internal/observability/exporter/otlp/otlp.go (1 hunks)
- internal/observability/trace/status.go (1 hunks)
- k8s/gateway/gateway/ing.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/gateway/gateway/lb/deployment.yaml (2 hunks)
- k8s/gateway/gateway/mirror/deployment.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/index/job/correction/cronjob.yaml (2 hunks)
- k8s/index/job/creation/cronjob.yaml (2 hunks)
- k8s/index/job/save/cronjob.yaml (2 hunks)
- k8s/index/operator/configmap.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/index/operator/deployment.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/manager/index/deployment.yaml (2 hunks)
- k8s/metrics/loki/loki.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/metrics/loki/promtail.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/metrics/profefe/cronjob.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/metrics/pyroscope/base/deployment.yaml (1 hunks)
- k8s/metrics/tempo/tempo.yaml (2 hunks)
- pkg/gateway/lb/handler/grpc/handler.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/index/job/save/service/indexer_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/e2e/crud/crud_faiss_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/e2e/crud/crud_test.go (9 hunks)
- tests/e2e/operation/multi.go (8 hunks)
- tests/e2e/operation/operation.go (4 hunks)
- tests/e2e/operation/stream.go (14 hunks)
- tests/e2e/performance/max_vector_dim_test.go (2 hunks)
- versions/CHAOS_MESH_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/DOCKER_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/HELM_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/KUBECTL_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/PROMETHEUS_STACK_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/PROTOBUF_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/REVIEWDOG_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/ACTIONS_CHECKOUT (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/ACTIONS_SETUP_NODE (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_ANALYZE (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_AUTOBUILD (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_INIT (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_UPLOAD_SARIF (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_ISSUE_METRICS (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/PETER_EVANS_CREATE_ISSUE_FROM_FILE (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/PETER_EVANS_CREATE_PULL_REQUEST (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (16)
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
- internal/observability/exporter/otlp/otlp.go
- internal/observability/trace/status.go
- versions/HELM_VERSION
- versions/KUBECTL_VERSION
- versions/PROMETHEUS_STACK_VERSION
- versions/PROTOBUF_VERSION
- versions/REVIEWDOG_VERSION
- versions/actions/ACTIONS_CHECKOUT
- versions/actions/ACTIONS_SETUP_NODE
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_ANALYZE
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_AUTOBUILD
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_INIT
- versions/actions/GITHUB_CODEQL_ACTION_UPLOAD_SARIF
- versions/actions/PETER_EVANS_CREATE_ISSUE_FROM_FILE
- versions/actions/PETER_EVANS_CREATE_PULL_REQUEST
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
example/client/agent/main.go (1)
Learnt from: kpango PR: vdaas/vald#2638 File: docs/tutorial/vald-agent-standalone-on-k8s.md:239-239 Timestamp: 2024-09-21T05:35:36.818Z Learning: In grpc-go, `grpc.DialContext` has been deprecated and `grpc.NewClient` should be used instead.
🪛 Markdownlint
docs/user-guides/client-api-config.md
49-49: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
165-165: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
289-289: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
473-473: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
656-656: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
docs/user-guides/filtering-configuration.md
156-156: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
🔇 Additional comments (99)
versions/CHAOS_MESH_VERSION (1)
1-1: Approve version update to Chaos Mesh 2.7.0The update from Chaos Mesh 2.6.4 to 2.7.0 has been noted. This minor version increment likely includes new features, improvements, or bug fixes that could benefit the project.
To ensure compatibility and understand the changes introduced in this version, please run the following verification steps:
Please review the output of these checks to ensure that:
- There are no breaking changes that affect our usage of Chaos Mesh.
- All relevant configuration files have been updated to use the new version.
- Any existing TODOs or FIXMEs related to Chaos Mesh have been addressed or are still relevant with the new version.
If any issues are found, please address them before merging this change.
✅ Verification successful
Chaos Mesh 2.7.0 Update Verified
No critical breaking changes or important notes were found in the Chaos Mesh 2.7.0 changelog. Additionally, there are no references to the new version in configuration files and no related TODO or FIXME comments requiring attention.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Chaos Mesh version compatibility and changelog # Check if there are any breaking changes or important notes in the changelog echo "Checking Chaos Mesh 2.7.0 changelog for breaking changes or important notes:" curl -s https://github.com/chaos-mesh/chaos-mesh/releases/tag/v2.7.0 | grep -iE "breaking change|important|attention|note" || echo "No critical notes found in the changelog." # Verify if the new version is mentioned in any configuration files echo "Checking for references to the new Chaos Mesh version in configuration files:" rg -i "chaos.?mesh.*2\.7\.0" --type yaml # Look for any Chaos Mesh related TODO or FIXME comments that might need addressing with the new version echo "Checking for Chaos Mesh related TODO or FIXME comments:" rg -i "TODO|FIXME" -C 3 | rg -i "chaos.?mesh"Length of output: 2843
versions/DOCKER_VERSION (1)
1-1: LGTM: Docker version updated correctly.The Docker version has been updated from v27.2.1 to v27.3.1, which aligns with the PR objectives of updating dependencies. This minor version bump suggests new features or improvements that should be backwards compatible.
To ensure this change is properly reflected throughout the project:
- Please update any documentation or configuration files that may reference the Docker version.
- Verify compatibility with the rest of the project, especially any Docker-related scripts or CI/CD pipelines.
You can use the following script to check for other occurrences of the old version number:
This will help ensure consistency across the project and prevent potential issues related to version mismatches.
✅ Verification successful
: Docker version updated consistently across the project.
The search for occurrences of v27.2.1 returned no results, confirming that the Docker version has been uniformly updated to v27.3.1 throughout the codebase.
No further action is required regarding Docker version references.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for occurrences of the old Docker version (v27.2.1) in the project echo "Searching for occurrences of v27.2.1 in the project:" rg "v27\.2\.1" --type-not md echo "If any results are found above, please update them to v27.3.1"Length of output: 278
example/client/go.mod (4)
28-28: LGTM: gRPC minor version updateThe update of google.golang.org/grpc to v1.67.0 is a minor version bump, which should maintain backward compatibility while potentially introducing new features or improvements.
14-17: LGTM: Google gRPC ecosystem updatesThe updates to Google's gRPC-related packages (genproto, grpc) appear to be routine version bumps. These updates likely include bug fixes and improvements.
To ensure compatibility, please run the following verification script:
36-36: LGTM: Indirect dependency updatesThe updates to indirect dependencies (golang.org/x/net and Google's genproto packages) align with the direct dependency changes. These updates should improve compatibility and potentially fix bugs.
To ensure these indirect dependency updates don't introduce any unexpected behavior, please run the following verification script:
Also applies to: 39-40
Line range hint
1-42: Summary: Routine dependency updates with potential improvementsThe changes in this
go.modfile represent routine updates to various dependencies, primarily focusing on Google's gRPC ecosystem and related packages. These updates likely include bug fixes, performance improvements, and potentially new features.While the changes appear safe, it's crucial to ensure that they don't introduce any unexpected behavior in the client example.
Please ensure to:
- Run all existing tests, including integration tests if available.
- Manually test the client example to verify its functionality with the updated dependencies.
- Review the changelogs of the updated packages, especially google.golang.org/grpc, to be aware of any new features or changes that might benefit the client example.
Run the following script to perform a comprehensive check:
k8s/gateway/gateway/ing.yaml (2)
Line range hint
48-60: LGTM: gRPC reflection service paths added correctly.The addition of explicit paths for gRPC reflection services (both v1alpha and v1) is excellent for compatibility and service discoverability. The configuration is consistent with other paths.
To ensure the gRPC reflection services are properly configured, please run:
41-47: LGTM: Catch-all path added correctly.The addition of the catch-all path "/" is a good practice to handle all unspecified routes. The configuration is consistent with other paths and uses the appropriate pathType.
To ensure this change doesn't conflict with existing routes, please run:
internal/net/grpc/codes/codes.go (1)
44-46: LGTM: Well-defined generic constraint for gRPC status codesThe
CodeTypeinterface is a well-designed type constraint that covers all relevant integer types and theCodetype. This allows for flexible and type-safe use of theToStringfunction with various representations of gRPC status codes.k8s/metrics/loki/loki.yaml (1)
34-34: Consider the implications of changingimagePullPolicytoAlwaysThe
imagePullPolicyfor the Loki container has been changed fromIfNotPresenttoAlways. While this ensures that the latest image is always used, it comes with some trade-offs:Pros:
- Guarantees the use of the most up-to-date image.
- Maintains consistency across different environments.
Cons:
- Increases network usage and deployment time.
- May cause issues if the image repository is temporarily unavailable.
For a metrics system like Loki, frequent updates might not be necessary, and the added overhead might not be justified.
Could you please clarify the reasoning behind this change? Are there specific requirements (e.g., frequent security updates) that necessitate always pulling the latest image?
If there's no strong reason for this change, consider keeping the policy as
IfNotPresentto optimize deployment performance and reduce potential points of failure.dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile (2)
43-44: LGTM: Proper configuration of Rust environment variablesThe addition of the
CARGO_HOMEenvironment variable and its inclusion in thePATHis a good practice. This change:
- Explicitly defines the location for Cargo's home directory, improving clarity and reproducibility.
- Ensures that Cargo's binaries are accessible in the
PATH.- Aligns with the PR objective of refactoring the Rust installation process.
These modifications contribute to a more robust and maintainable Rust development environment within the Docker image.
Line range hint
1-91: Summary: Dockerfile changes are beneficial and well-implementedThe modifications to this Dockerfile, primarily the addition of the
CARGO_HOMEenvironment variable, are positive improvements that enhance the Rust development environment configuration. These changes align well with the PR objectives and maintain the integrity of the existing build process.The only suggestion provided is a minor reorganization of environment variables for better grouping and readability. Overall, the changes contribute to a more robust and maintainable Dockerfile for the Vald agent.
k8s/metrics/tempo/tempo.yaml (2)
76-76: Approved: Updated imagePullPolicy to AlwaysThis change ensures that the latest Tempo image is always pulled, which aligns with the refactoring for the new release. It helps maintain consistency and ensures the most up-to-date version is deployed.
Consider the impact on deployment time and network usage. If these are concerns, you may want to implement a more controlled update strategy. To verify the current strategy, run:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Update strategy aligns with imagePullPolicy change
The
rollingUpdatestrategy withmaxSurge: 0andmaxUnavailable: 1ink8s/metrics/tempo/tempo.yamlensures that only one pod is unavailable during deployments while always pulling the latest image. This configuration supports maintaining up-to-date deployments with controlled resource usage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the update strategy for the Tempo deployment rg --type yaml 'kind:\s*Deployment' -A 20 | rg 'name:\s*tempo' -A 20 | rg 'strategy:'Length of output: 127257
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the update strategy for the Tempo deployment rg --type yaml 'kind:\s*Deployment' -A 30 | rg 'name:\s*tempo' -A 30 | rg 'strategy:'Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the full update strategy for the Tempo deployment rg --type yaml 'kind:\s*Deployment' -A 50 | rg 'name:\s*tempo' -A 50 | rg 'strategy:' -A 10Length of output: 638
Line range hint
1-160: Verify: Missing initContainers configurationThe PR objectives mention adding an
imagePullPolicyconfiguration to theinitContainers, but this file doesn't contain anyinitContainers. Please verify if this change should be applied to this file or if it's intended for a different configuration file.To check for
initContainersin other YAML files, run:internal/net/grpc/interceptor/server/logging/accesslog.go (4)
22-22: LGTM: New imports are appropriate for the changes.The addition of the "fmt" package and the "status" package from the internal Vald project are suitable for the new functionality implemented in this file.
Also applies to: 26-29
38-38: LGTM: New constant for failed RPC message.The addition of the
rpcFailedMessageconstant is a good practice for maintaining consistency in log messages for failed RPC calls.
118-120: LGTM: Improved logging in interceptors.The updates to the logging statements in both
AccessLogInterceptorandAccessLogStreamInterceptorare well-implemented. They now utilize the newString()method ofAccessLogEntity, which provides more comprehensive and consistent log messages, especially for error cases. The log levels remain appropriate, with Warn for errors and Debug for successful completions.Also applies to: 166-168
Line range hint
1-182: Summary: Enhancements to AccessLog Interceptor are well-implemented.The changes in this file successfully achieve the PR objective of enhancing the readability of the AccessLog Interceptor. The new
String()method forAccessLogEntityand the updated logging statements in the interceptors contribute to more informative and consistent log messages. These improvements will aid in debugging and monitoring gRPC calls.A minor suggestion was made to improve error handling during JSON marshaling in the
String()method. Overall, the changes are well-implemented and improve the functionality of the access logging system.internal/net/grpc/pool/pool_bench_test.go (3)
Line range hint
1-214: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The modifications to replace
grpc.DialContextwithgrpc.NewClienthave been consistently applied in both the static and parallel benchmark functions. These changes simplify the code and remove the usage of the deprecatedDialContextinterface.To ensure the changes don't negatively impact performance, it's recommended to run and compare the benchmark results as suggested in the previous comments.
189-189: LGTM! Verify parallel benchmark performance.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis consistent with the previous modification and aligns with the PR objectives.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact parallel performance, please run the following script to compare benchmark results:
This will help verify that the parallel performance remains consistent or improves with the new implementation.
132-132: LGTM! Consider comparing benchmark results.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis in line with the PR objectives to remove the deprecatedDialContextinterface. The new method simplifies the code by removing the need for a context parameter.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact performance, please run the following script to compare benchmark results:
This will help verify that the performance remains consistent or improves with the new implementation.
dockers/dev/Dockerfile (2)
48-48: LGTM: Good addition of RUSTUP_HOME environment variableThe addition of
ENV RUSTUP_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/rustupis a positive change. It explicitly sets the location for Rust's toolchain management, which improves organization and supports potential multi-user scenarios. Using the previously definedRUST_HOMEmaintains consistency in the environment setup.
Line range hint
1-147: Overall: Well-structured improvements to the development containerThe changes to this Dockerfile enhance the development environment setup while maintaining good Docker practices. The addition of the RUSTUP_HOME environment variable and the reorganization of package installations improve the container's functionality and maintainability.
Key improvements:
- Explicit setting of Rust toolchain location.
- Addition of new development tools and languages.
- Use of
--no-install-recommendsto optimize image size.- Proper cleanup commands to reduce the final image size.
The suggested minor improvements in grouping related installations could further enhance readability and maintainability. Overall, these changes contribute positively to the project's development workflow.
k8s/index/job/save/cronjob.yaml (3)
56-56: Approved: AddedimagePullPolicy: Alwaysto wait-for-agent init containerThis change ensures that the latest version of the
busybox:stableimage is always pulled for the init container. It helps maintain consistency across environments and prevents issues with outdated local images. However, be aware that it may slightly increase deployment time and network usage.
68-68: Approved: AddedimagePullPolicy: Alwaysto wait-for-discoverer init containerThis change is consistent with the previous init container modification. The same benefits and considerations apply as mentioned in the comment for the
wait-for-agentcontainer.
Line range hint
56-82: Summary: Consistent application ofimagePullPolicy: Alwaysacross all containersThe changes in this file consistently apply
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto all containers (two init containers and the main container). This ensures that the latest images are always pulled, which is beneficial for maintaining consistency and incorporating the latest changes, especially for the nightly build of the main container.These changes align with the PR objectives and improve the deployment consistency. However, keep in mind that this may slightly increase deployment time and network usage. For production deployments, consider using specific version tags for better control over the exact versions being deployed.
k8s/index/job/creation/cronjob.yaml (1)
56-56: Consider the implications of settingimagePullPolicy: AlwaysSetting
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysfor thewait-for-agentinit container ensures that the latest version of the image is always pulled. This can be beneficial for development environments or when frequent updates are expected. However, it may increase startup time and network usage in production environments.To ensure consistency across the configuration, let's check if this policy is applied to other containers:
Consider whether this policy aligns with your deployment strategy and environment requirements.
✅ Verification successful
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysis consistently applied to all containers incronjob.yamlAll containers within the
vald-index-creationCronJob are set to pull the latest images by specifyingimagePullPolicy: Always. This ensures that the most recent image versions are used every time the CronJob runs, aligning with environments that require up-to-date deployments.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check imagePullPolicy for all containers in the file grep -n "imagePullPolicy:" k8s/index/job/creation/cronjob.yamlLength of output: 185
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract container names and their imagePullPolicy from cronjob.yaml ast-grep --lang yaml --pattern $' containers = _ - name: $_ image: $_ imagePullPolicy: $_ ' k8s/index/job/creation/cronjob.yamlLength of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract container types and their imagePullPolicy from cronjob.yaml rg -C 2 "imagePullPolicy: Always" k8s/index/job/creation/cronjob.yamlLength of output: 612
k8s/index/job/correction/cronjob.yaml (3)
Line range hint
1-150: Summary: Consistent improvement in initContainers configurationThe changes in this file consistently add
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto both initContainers (wait-for-agentandwait-for-discoverer). This modification ensures that the latest busybox images are always used, which can be beneficial for critical setup processes.These changes align with the PR objectives and improve the reliability of the initContainers without altering the overall structure or functionality of the CronJob.
To ensure these changes don't conflict with any project-wide policies, run the following check:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete:
imagePullPolicyConsistency ConfirmedAll instances of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysin thecronjob.yamland across the codebase adhere to the project-wide guidelines. No inconsistencies or policy violations were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any project-wide imagePullPolicy guidelines or inconsistencies rg --type yaml 'imagePullPolicy:' -C 5Length of output: 85552
56-56: Approved: AddedimagePullPolicy: Alwaystowait-for-agentinitContainerThis change ensures that the latest version of the busybox image is always pulled for the
wait-for-agentinitContainer. It's a good practice for critical setup containers that may need frequent updates.Note: While this ensures up-to-date images, it might slightly increase job start time and network usage. Verify if this aligns with your deployment strategy:
68-68: Approved: AddedimagePullPolicy: Alwaystowait-for-discovererinitContainerThis change is consistent with the previous one, ensuring that the latest version of the busybox image is always pulled for the
wait-for-discovererinitContainer as well.To ensure consistency across the configuration, run the following check:
k8s/metrics/loki/promtail.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-224: Overall, the Promtail configuration looks well-structured and appropriate.The Kubernetes resources defined in this file (DaemonSet, ClusterRole, ClusterRoleBinding, ServiceAccount, and ConfigMap) are correctly configured for deploying Promtail as a log collection agent. The scrape configs and relabel configurations in the Promtail ConfigMap are set up to collect logs from Vald service pods, which aligns with the project's logging needs.
To further improve the configuration:
- Consider adding resource limits and requests to the Promtail container for better resource management.
- Evaluate if the current scrape configs and relabel rules capture all necessary information for your logging requirements.
- Periodically review and update the Promtail version to ensure you're using the latest stable release with security patches and performance improvements.
tests/e2e/performance/max_vector_dim_test.go (1)
Line range hint
128-156: Review the gRPC client creation changes and context managementThe changes in this segment involve updating the gRPC client creation method and adjusting the context management. Here are the key points to consider:
The switch from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientsuggests an update in the gRPC library version or a custom implementation. Ensure that this change is consistent with the project's gRPC usage across all files.The connection options (insecure and keepalive parameters) are now passed directly to
grpc.NewClient. Verify that this new method supports all the required options and that they are applied correctly.The context creation has been moved after the connection creation. This change might affect the context's lifecycle management, especially if the context was previously used during the connection establishment. Please confirm that this doesn't introduce any timing or cancellation issues.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in gRPC client creation methods and potential context-related issues across the codebase.
k8s/manager/index/deployment.yaml (1)
74-74: Consistent application ofimagePullPolicy: Always.The addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto thewait-for-discovererinit container is consistent with the change made to thewait-for-agentcontainer.Please refer to the previous comment regarding the
wait-for-agentcontainer for suggestions on optimizing this configuration.k8s/gateway/gateway/lb/deployment.yaml (3)
61-61: Approved: Addition of imagePullPolicy: AlwaysThe addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto the 'wait-for-discoverer' init container ensures that the latest version of the image is always pulled. This is generally a good practice for production environments as it helps maintain up-to-date and consistent deployments.However, be aware that this may slightly increase deployment time and network usage. If these factors are critical in your environment, you might want to consider using a specific image tag instead of 'stable' and setting
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent.
73-73: Approved: Consistent imagePullPolicy for init containersThe addition of
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto the 'wait-for-agent' init container is consistent with the change made to the 'wait-for-discoverer' container. This consistency is good for maintainability and ensures that both init containers behave the same way with regards to image pulling.As mentioned earlier, while this ensures the latest images are used, be mindful of the potential impact on deployment time and network usage in your specific environment.
Line range hint
1-205: Overall review: Changes are minimal and adhere to best practicesThe changes in this file are limited to adding
imagePullPolicy: Alwaysto both init containers ('wait-for-discoverer' and 'wait-for-agent'). These changes are consistent and align with best practices for ensuring up-to-date images in production environments.The rest of the deployment configuration remains unchanged and appears to follow Kubernetes best practices, including:
- Proper resource limits and requests
- Comprehensive liveness, readiness, and startup probes
- Secure container settings (non-root user, read-only filesystem, dropped capabilities)
- Well-defined affinity rules
- Use of config maps for configuration
No further changes or improvements are necessary at this time.
tests/e2e/operation/multi.go (8)
133-133:⚠️ Potential issueConsistent context handling issues
This method exhibits the same context-related issues as the previously reviewed methods.
Please apply the same fixes as suggested for the earlier methods.
Verify the changes with:
#!/bin/bash # Search for MultiLinearSearchByID method calls to verify context usage rg --type go 'MultiLinearSearchByID\s*\(' -A 3
99-99:⚠️ Potential issueContext handling issues persist
This method has the same context-related issues as discussed in the previous method review comments.
Please apply the same fixes as suggested for the MultiSearch and MultiSearchByID methods.
Verify the changes with:
Line range hint
1-315: Summary of review and next stepsThis review has identified a consistent issue across all methods in the file: the removal of the
context.Contextparameter and changes in client retrieval. These changes could potentially impact error handling, request cancellation, and overall functionality.To address these issues:
- Reintroduce the
ctx context.Contextparameter to all method signatures in this file.- Update all
getClientmethod calls to use the context parameter:c.getClient(ctx).- Ensure that the
getClientmethod in the parent struct is updated to accept and utilize the context parameter if necessary.- Review and update any calling code that may be affected by these signature changes.
- Consider adding more comprehensive error handling that utilizes the context, if not already present.
- Preserve and potentially enhance the documentation for MultiUpdate and MultiUpsert API behaviors.
To ensure these changes are applied consistently and to identify any other affected areas in the codebase, run the following command:
After making these changes, please request another review to ensure all issues have been adequately addressed.
244-244:⚠️ Potential issueContext issues and important API behavior note for MultiUpsert
- This method has the same context-related issues as the previously reviewed methods.
Please apply the same fixes as suggested for the earlier methods.
- The comment about the MultiUpsert API behavior is crucial, similar to the MultiUpdate method. Ensure this information is preserved and possibly documented in a more prominent place, such as in the API documentation.
Verify the changes with:
284-284:⚠️ Potential issuePersistent context handling issues
This method continues to exhibit the same context-related issues as all previously reviewed methods in this file.
Please apply the same fixes as suggested for the earlier methods.
Verify the changes with:
167-167:⚠️ Potential issueContext handling issues continue
The context-related issues persist in this method, mirroring those in the previously reviewed methods.
Please apply the same fixes as suggested for the earlier methods.
Verify the changes with:
204-204:⚠️ Potential issueContext issues and important API behavior note
- This method has the same context-related issues as the previously reviewed methods.
Please apply the same fixes as suggested for the earlier methods.
- The comment about the MultiUpdate API behavior is crucial. Ensure this information is preserved and possibly documented in a more prominent place, such as in the API documentation.
Verify the changes with:
✅ Verification successful
Confirmed: Context issues apply to all Multi methods*
The verification process confirms that the context-related issues mentioned in the original review comment are applicable not only to the MultiUpdate method but to all Multi* methods (MultiLinearSearchByID, MultiInsert, MultiUpdate, MultiUpsert, MultiRemove) throughout the codebase. These methods consistently use context as their first argument.
Apply the suggested fixes for context-related issues to all Multi* methods across the codebase.
The comment about the MultiUpdate API behavior remains crucial. Ensure this information is preserved and consider documenting it more prominently, such as in the API documentation for all Multi* methods where applicable.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for MultiUpdate method calls to verify context usage rg --type go 'MultiUpdate\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 17488
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected search for multiple Multi* methods to verify context usage rg --type go '(MultiLinearSearchByID|MultiInsert|MultiUpdate|MultiUpsert|MultiRemove)\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 97934
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected search for multiple Multi* methods to verify context usage rg --type go '(MultiLinearSearchByID|MultiInsert|MultiUpdate|MultiUpsert|MultiRemove)\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 97934
27-27:⚠️ Potential issuePotential issues with context handling and undefined variable
The changes to this method introduce a few concerns:
- Removing the
ctx context.Contextparameter from the method signature might impact error handling and request cancellation capabilities.- The
MultiSearchcall on line 52 still uses thectxparameter, which is now undefined due to its removal from the method signature.To resolve these issues, consider the following changes:
- Reintroduce the
ctx context.Contextparameter to the method signature.- Update the
getClientmethod to accept and utilize the context parameter if necessary.-func (c *client) MultiSearch(t *testing.T, ds Dataset) error { +func (c *client) MultiSearch(t *testing.T, ctx context.Context, ds Dataset) error { - client, err := c.getClient() + client, err := c.getClient(ctx) if err != nil { return err } // ... (rest of the method remains unchanged) }To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
Reintroduce context parameter to maintain consistency and functionality
The review comment is correct. The removal of the
ctx context.Contextparameter from theMultiLinearSearchByIDmethod is inconsistent with the rest of the codebase and could lead to issues. To resolve this:
- Reintroduce the
ctx context.Contextparameter to the method signature.- Update the
getClientmethod call to use the context parameter.- Ensure all other Multi* methods in the same file maintain the context parameter for consistency.
Example fix:
func (c *client) MultiLinearSearchByID(t *testing.T, ctx context.Context, ds Dataset) error { client, err := c.getClient(ctx) if err != nil { return err } // ... (rest of the method remains unchanged) }This change will maintain consistency with other parts of the codebase and preserve important functionality related to context handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for MultiSearch method calls to verify context usage rg --type go 'MultiSearch\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 17488
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to search for Multi* method calls to verify context usage rg --type go '(MultiLinearSearchByID|MultiInsert|MultiUpdate|MultiUpsert|MultiRemove)\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 97934
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to search for Multi* method calls to verify context usage rg --type go '(MultiLinearSearchByID|MultiInsert|MultiUpdate|MultiUpsert|MultiRemove)\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 97934
example/client/main.go (1)
69-69: Verify the compatibility and behavior ofgrpc.NewClientThe change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientappears to be part of an update in the gRPC client initialization. While this change seems valid, it's important to ensure that:
- The
NewClientfunction provides the same functionality asDialContext.- The removal of the
ctxparameter doesn't impact the desired behavior, especially in terms of cancellation and timeouts.- This change is consistent with the version of the gRPC library being used.
To ensure compatibility and correct behavior, please run the following checks:
Also, ensure that this change doesn't introduce any breaking changes in the client's behavior, especially regarding connection handling and context propagation.
✅ Verification successful
Compatibility and behavior of
grpc.NewClientverifiedThe transition from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClienthas been consistently implemented across the codebase. With the gRPC library updated to versionv1.67.0,grpc.NewClientis fully supported and properly handles connection management without thectxparameter. No issues impacting connection handling or context propagation were identified.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any other occurrences of DialContext in the codebase rg --type go 'grpc\.DialContext' # Verify the import and usage of grpc.NewClient rg --type go 'grpc\.NewClient' # Check the version of the gRPC library being used grep 'google.golang.org/grpc' go.modLength of output: 1662
tests/e2e/crud/crud_faiss_test.go (1)
193-193: Improved error reporting inTestE2EUpdateOnlyThe enhancement to the error message by including both
msgandstatusvalues is a positive change. This modification provides more context for debugging and aligns with Go's best practices for error handling.example/client/agent/main.go (1)
70-70: LGTM! Verify error handling and connection management.The change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis correct and aligns with the deprecation ofDialContextin grpc-go. This update improves the code by using the recommended method for creating a gRPC client.Please ensure that:
- Error handling is still appropriate for the new method.
- Connection lifecycle management (if any) is still correct with the new method.
You can verify this by running the following script:
internal/core/algorithm/usearch/usearch_test.go (1)
254-255: Verify and document changes in search result expectations.The expected search results for the test case "return most accurate result after insert 10 vectors with limited size 5" have been updated:
- The order of the first two results (IDs 10 and 9) has been swapped.
- The distance values for these results are now more precise (e.g., 2.384185791015625e-07 instead of 3).
These changes suggest a refinement in the search algorithm or its configuration. Please verify that these new expectations are correct and align with the current behavior of the
usearchlibrary.Could you provide more context on why these changes were made? It would be helpful to document the reason for these updates, either in a comment within the test case or in the commit message, to maintain clarity for future developers.
✅ Verification successful
Further investigate the updates to search result expectations.
To better understand the rationale behind the changes in the test case "return most accurate result after insert 10 vectors with limited size 5," please run the following shell scripts:
Review Verified: No issues found with the test case changes.
The updates in
internal/core/algorithm/usearch/usearch_test.gofor the test case "return most accurate result after insert 10 vectors with limited size 5" involve swapping the order of the first two results and increasing the precision of their distance values. These changes align with the documented tuning parameters to improve precision as outlined indocs/performance/tuning-search-performance.md.
- No removed or replaced code was detected in the specified lines.
- Test case adjustments enhance the accuracy and reliability of search results based on the documented tuning guidelines.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for recent changes in the usearch library or related configuration files. # Test: Look for recent changes in usearch-related files git log -n 5 --pretty=format:"%h - %s" --grep="usearch" # Test: Check for changes in configuration files related to search precision or algorithm git diff HEAD~5 HEAD -- **/config*.{go,yaml,json} # Test: Search for any recent discussions or issues related to search precision gh issue list --label "search-precision" --limit 5 gh pr list --label "search-precision" --limit 5Length of output: 55130
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the entire codebase for mentions of 'precision' to identify related changes or documentation. # Test: Use ripgrep to search for 'precision' in all files rg --ignore-case 'precision'Length of output: 256
docs/tutorial/get-started-with-faiss-agent.md (1)
281-281: Verify the implementation and usage ofgrpc.NewClient.The change from
grpc.Dialtogrpc.NewClientappears to be using a custom or wrapper function instead of the standard gRPC method. Please ensure that:
- The
NewClientfunction is properly implemented and tested.- It provides the same functionality as
grpc.Dialin terms of connection creation.- Any differences in behavior between
NewClientandDialare documented.Additionally, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose and implementation of the
NewClientfunction, especially if it's not a standard gRPC method.To verify the implementation and usage of
grpc.NewClient, please run the following script:internal/net/dialer.go (1)
249-264: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove port determination logic and error handling
The new implementation for determining the port when it's not explicitly provided is a good addition. It improves the robustness of the
cachedDialermethod by handling cases where the port is missing. However, there are a few points to consider:
The default ports (80 for TCP and 53 for UDP) might not be suitable for all use cases. Consider making these configurable or documenting this behavior clearly.
For unknown network types, the code currently logs a warning and leaves the port empty. This might lead to connection failures. Consider either:
a) Returning an error for unknown network types.
b) Providing a fallback default port.The warning message for unknown network types could be more informative. Consider including guidance on how to resolve the issue.
Here's a suggested improvement:
if nport != 0 { port = strconv.FormatUint(uint64(nport), 10) } else { const ( defaultTCPPort = "80" defaultUDPPort = "53" ) switch network { case TCP.String(), TCP4.String(), TCP6.String(): port = defaultTCPPort case UDP.String(), UDP4.String(), UDP6.String(): port = defaultUDPPort default: - log.Warnf("Unknown network type: %s. Port will be empty.", network) + log.Warnf("Unknown network type: %s. Using fallback port 0. Please specify a port explicitly for this network type.", network) + port = "0" } }This change provides a fallback port and gives more informative guidance in the warning message.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce regressions, please run the following verification:
This will help identify any existing tests or usages that might need to be updated due to this change.
✅ Verification successful
Port determination logic and error handling are appropriately implemented
The suggested improvements for the
cachedDialermethod enhance its robustness by handling unspecified ports and logging warnings for unknown network types. The existing tests forcachedDialerensure that these changes are well-covered and do not introduce regressions.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any existing tests or usages that might be affected by this change rg --type go "cachedDialer.*network.*port"Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the definition of cachedDialer in Go files ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func cachedDialer($_)' . # Search for all usages of cachedDialer in the codebase rg --type go "cachedDialer"Length of output: 697
docs/tutorial/get-started.md (1)
336-336:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate gRPC client creation and fix capitalization.
The gRPC client creation has been updated from
grpc.Dialtogrpc.NewClient, which is good as it likely reflects an update in the gRPC library or a move to a custom client creation method. However, two points need attention:
Ensure that
grpc.NewClientis properly documented and available in the version of the gRPC library being used in this tutorial.The sentence doesn't start with an uppercase letter. This issue was previously flagged by LanguageTool and remains valid.
To address these points, consider the following changes:
-conn, err := grpc.NewClient(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials())) +Conn, err := grpc.NewClient(grpcServerAddr, grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials()))Also, ensure that the
grpc.NewClientmethod is properly documented in the project's API reference or provide a brief explanation of this custom method if it's not a standard gRPC function.To confirm the availability and usage of
grpc.NewClient, please run the following command:This will help verify if
grpc.NewClientis a custom function defined in the project or if it's part of an updated gRPC library..github/workflows/e2e.yaml (2)
Line range hint
27-27: Excellent addition of theDATASETenvironment variable.The introduction of the
DATASETenvironment variable at the workflow level is a great improvement. It centralizes the dataset configuration, making it easier to maintain and modify across all jobs. This change enhances the workflow's flexibility and reduces the risk of inconsistencies between different E2E test scenarios.
Line range hint
1-589: Summary of changes in the E2E workflowThe changes made to this workflow file are generally positive and should improve the E2E testing process:
- The addition of the
DATASETenvironment variable centralizes the dataset configuration, enhancing maintainability and consistency across all jobs.- The increase in
E2E_WAIT_FOR_CREATE_INDEX_DURATIONfor thee2e-stream-crud-skip-exist-checkjob should help reduce false negatives due to timeout issues.However, consider reviewing the
E2E_WAIT_FOR_CREATE_INDEX_DURATIONparameter in other jobs for consistency. This will ensure that all jobs benefit from the extended wait time if necessary.Overall, these changes contribute to a more robust and maintainable E2E testing workflow.
pkg/index/job/save/service/indexer_test.go (2)
56-58: Improved error message comparison indefaultCheckFuncThe change from directly comparing error objects to comparing their string representations using
err.Error()is a good improvement. This modification enhances the readability of error messages in test output, making it easier to identify and debug issues.
Line range hint
1-729: Overall improvement in test coverage and error handlingThe changes in this file represent a significant improvement in the test suite for the
indexstruct'sStartmethod. The key improvements include:
- Enhanced error message comparison in
defaultCheckFunc.- Addition of new test cases covering various scenarios, including gRPC status error handling.
- Improved coverage of the
Startmethod's functionality.These changes contribute to a more robust and comprehensive test suite, which will help maintain the reliability of the codebase as it evolves. The suggestions provided in the previous comments, if implemented, would further enhance the quality and maintainability of these tests.
docs/user-guides/client-api-config.md (3)
165-165: Approve the consistent update to gRPC connection methodThe change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis correct and consistent with the previous update in the Insert service section.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
165-165: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
289-289: Approve the consistent update to gRPC connection methodThe change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis correct and consistent with the previous updates in the Insert and Update service sections.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
289-289: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
656-656: Approve the consistent update to gRPC connection methodThe change from
grpc.DialContexttogrpc.NewClientis correct and consistent with the previous updates in other service sections.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
656-656: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
Makefile (2)
Line range hint
1-706: Overall Makefile improvementsThe changes in this Makefile primarily focus on improving the installation processes for usearch and Faiss libraries. These updates should lead to a more robust and consistent build process, especially for the usearch library. The disabling of GPU support for Faiss might impact performance for GPU-accelerated operations, so ensure this aligns with your project's requirements.
No other significant changes were observed in the Makefile. The overall structure and other targets remain unchanged, maintaining the existing functionality for other parts of the build process.
668-668: Disabled GPU support for FaissThe Faiss installation process has been updated to disable GPU support by adding the
-DFAISS_ENABLE_GPU=OFFflag to the CMake configuration.This change has the following implications:
- It simplifies the build process by removing GPU-related dependencies.
- It may reduce the overall library size and compilation time.
- However, it also means that GPU acceleration for Faiss operations will not be available.
Consider whether this change aligns with your project's requirements. If GPU support is needed for performance reasons, you might want to keep it enabled.
To ensure the Faiss installation process works as expected with GPU support disabled, you can run the following script:
internal/net/grpc/client.go (1)
170-170: LGTM! Consider verifying the impact on connection establishment.The removal of
grpc.WithBlock()changes the connection behavior from blocking to non-blocking. This could potentially improve the overall performance of the connection monitor. However, it's important to verify that this change doesn't negatively impact the overall connection establishment process, especially in scenarios where immediate connection availability is crucial.To verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: No connection-related issues detected.
The removal of
grpc.WithBlock()does not appear to introduce any connection-related errors based on the current log analysis. No failures or timeouts related to establishing connections were found in the repository logs.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any connection-related issues or timeouts in the logs after this change. # Test: Search for connection-related log entries rg --type go "failed to (initial connection|connect)" -C 5Length of output: 1549
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search runtime log files for connection-related errors after removing grpc.WithBlock(). # Assuming log files are located in the 'logs' directory rg "failed to initial connection to|failed to connect to" logs/ -A 5Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the entire repository for connection-related errors after removing grpc.WithBlock(). # Search recursively for connection-related error messages in all files rg "failed to initial connection to|failed to connect to" -A 5Length of output: 828
go.mod (3)
7-8: Notable updates in replace directivesSeveral important Google Cloud libraries have been updated:
cloud.google.com/go/bigqueryfrom v1.62.0 to v1.63.0cloud.google.com/go/computefrom v1.28.0 to v1.28.1cloud.google.com/go/iamfrom v1.2.0 to v1.2.1cloud.google.com/go/kmsfrom v1.19.0 to v1.20.0cloud.google.com/go/monitoringfrom v1.21.0 to v1.21.1cloud.google.com/go/tracefrom v1.11.0 to v1.11.1These updates likely include bug fixes and minor improvements. Please ensure that these changes are compatible with your project and test thoroughly.
Also applies to: 11-13, 17-17
48-68: AWS SDK for Go v2 and related packages updatedThe AWS SDK for Go v2 and several related packages have been updated:
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2to v1.31.0git.luolix.top/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configto v1.27.38git.luolix.top/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsto v1.17.36- Several other AWS service clients (e.g., S3, KMS, SNS, SQS) have also been updated
These updates likely include new features, bug fixes, and performance improvements. Please review the changelog for these packages and ensure that your code is compatible with any breaking changes. Also, consider updating your tests to cover any new functionality.
To verify the impact of these changes, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for AWS SDK usage in the codebase # Expected result: List of files using AWS SDK, helping to identify areas that might be affected by the update echo "Files using AWS SDK:" rg --type go 'github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2' echo "Files using specific AWS services:" rg --type go 'github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/(s3|kms|sns|sqs|secretsmanager|ssm)'
322-322: Major updates to gRPC and Protobuf librariesgRPC has been updated to v1.67.0 and Protobuf to v1.34.2. These are significant updates that may introduce breaking changes along with bug fixes and performance improvements. Please consider the following:
- Review the changelogs for both gRPC and Protobuf to understand the changes and any potential breaking changes.
- Update and regenerate any Protobuf-generated code in your project.
- Test thoroughly, especially focusing on gRPC communication and Protobuf serialization/deserialization.
- Update any gRPC-related configurations or code that might be affected by the new version.
Run the following script to identify files that might be affected by these updates:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify files using gRPC and Protobuf # Expected result: List of files using gRPC and Protobuf, helping to focus testing efforts echo "Files using gRPC:" rg --type go 'google.golang.org/grpc' echo "Files using Protobuf:" rg --type go 'google.golang.org/protobuf' echo "Protobuf files that might need regeneration:" fd -e .protoAlso applies to: 411-412
charts/vald/values.yaml (3)
1078-1085: Approve: Addition of init containers improves startup reliabilityThe addition of init containers for waiting on the discoverer and agent components is a good practice. This ensures that the gateway starts only after its dependencies are ready, which can prevent issues during the startup process. The use of the lightweight busybox:stable image and the "Always" pull policy are appropriate choices for this purpose.
1362-1365: Approve: Consistent init container addition for gateway.filterThe addition of an init container for the gateway.filter deployment is consistent with the previous changes. This wait-for container targeting the gateway-lb component ensures proper startup order and dependency management. The configuration mirrors the previous init containers, maintaining uniformity across the deployment.
3140-3147: Approve: Consistent init container strategy for manager.indexThe addition of init containers for the manager.index deployment follows the same pattern established in previous components. This consistent approach to dependency management ensures that the manager.index starts only after the agent and discoverer components are ready. The uniform configuration across different components promotes a standardized and reliable startup process throughout the system.
versions/actions/GITHUB_ISSUE_METRICS (1)
1-1: Version update approvedThe update to version 3.12.0 is acceptable.
dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile (1)
48-48: Addition ofRUSTUP_HOMEenvironment variableThe line
ENV RUSTUP_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/rustupcorrectly sets theRUSTUP_HOMEenvironment variable. This is important for managing the Rust toolchain usingrustupand ensures that the tool can properly locate its configurations and installations. The addition is consistent with the existing environment variablesRUST_HOMEandCARGO_HOME, maintaining a structured environment setup for Rust.internal/net/grpc/errdetails/errdetails.go (1)
62-75: Verify the necessity of exporting message name variablesThe variables have been changed from unexported (e.g.,
debugInfoMessageName) to exported (e.g.,DebugInfoMessageName). Ensure that this change is needed and that these variables are intended to be accessed from outside the package.You can run the following script to check for external usages:
✅ Verification successful
Exporting of Message Name Variables Unnecessary
The exported message name variables are only referenced within internal packages. No external usages detected. Consider reverting these variables to unexported if external access is not required.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for external references to the exported message name variables. # Test: Find references to these variables outside the `errdetails` package. Expect: No matches indicate they are unused externally. rg --type go --glob 'internal/net/grpc/errdetails/' -L -v -F -w -e 'DebugInfoMessageName' \ -e 'ErrorInfoMessageName' \ -e 'BadRequestMessageName' \ -e 'BadRequestFieldViolationMessageName' \ -e 'LocalizedMessageMessageName' \ -e 'PreconditionFailureMessageName' \ -e 'PreconditionFailureViolationMessageName' \ -e 'HelpMessageName' \ -e 'HelpLinkMessageName' \ -e 'QuotaFailureMessageName' \ -e 'QuotaFailureViolationMessageName' \ -e 'RequestInfoMessageName' \ -e 'ResourceInfoMessageName' \ -e 'RetryInfoMessageName'Length of output: 614
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for external references to the exported message name variables, excluding the `errdetails` package. # Corrected Test: Find references to these variables outside the `internal/net/grpc/errdetails` package. rg --type go --glob '!internal/net/grpc/errdetails/**' -F -w -e 'DebugInfoMessageName' \ -e 'ErrorInfoMessageName' \ -e 'BadRequestMessageName' \ -e 'BadRequestFieldViolationMessageName' \ -e 'LocalizedMessageMessageName' \ -e 'PreconditionFailureMessageName' \ -e 'PreconditionFailureViolationMessageName' \ -e 'HelpMessageName' \ -e 'HelpLinkMessageName' \ -e 'QuotaFailureMessageName' \ -e 'QuotaFailureViolationMessageName' \ -e 'RequestInfoMessageName' \ -e 'ResourceInfoMessageName' \ -e 'RetryInfoMessageName'Length of output: 2954
internal/net/grpc/pool/pool.go (1)
Line range hint
130-146: Verify the necessity of closingconnwhengrpc.NewClientreturns an errorWhen
grpc.NewClientreturns an error, it's important to confirm whether the returnedconnneeds to be closed. According to common practices, if an error is returned, the connection might not be fully established, and closing a nil or invalid connection could lead to unexpected behavior.Please run the following script to check other usages of
grpc.NewClientin the codebase and see how errors are handled in those instances:✅ Verification successful
Verified: The current error handling for
grpc.NewClientcorrectly closes the connection when an error occurs, consistent with the rest of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of grpc.NewClient and inspect their error handling. # Expected: Identify patterns in error handling to ensure consistency. rg --type go 'grpc\.NewClient' -A 5Length of output: 4413
tests/e2e/operation/stream.go (13)
296-298: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
416-418: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
534-536: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
640-642: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
743-745: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
847-849: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
949-951: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
1032-1034: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
1050-1052: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
1077-1079: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
1099-1101: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
1189-1191: [Duplicate Comment] Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameter
96-98: Verify thatgetClientfunction correctly handles context after removal ofctxparameterThe
ctxparameter has been removed from thec.getClient()call. Ensure that thegetClientfunction no longer requires the context parameter and that context management is properly handled elsewhere to prevent any potential issues with context propagation or cancellation.Please run the following script to confirm that
getClientdoes not require actxparameter:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
getClientDoes Not Require actxParameterThe
getClientmethod intests/e2e/operation/operation.gois correctly defined without actxparameter. Context management is appropriately handled elsewhere, ensuring no issues with context propagation or cancellation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `getClient` method does not take a `ctx` parameter. # Test: Search for the definition of `getClient` method without any parameters. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (c *client) getClient() ($_*) {$$$}'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `getClient` method still requires a `ctx` parameter. # Test: Search for the definition of `getClient` method that includes a `ctx` parameter. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (c *client) getClient($_, ctx $_) {$$$}'Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate all definitions of the `getClient` method and display their parameters. # Test: Search for all definitions of `getClient` method with any parameters. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ($_ *client) getClient($_) {$$$}' --print # Additionally, list all occurrences of `getClient` to ensure no definitions are missed. rg 'func .*getClient.*' --glob '*.go'Length of output: 400
tests/e2e/crud/crud_test.go (7)
448-448: Enhanced error message to include error code.At line 448, the error message now includes the error code using
codes.ToString(status). This addition improves debugging by providing clearer information about the error encountered.
483-483: Enhanced error message to include error code.Similarly, at line 483, including the error code in the error message enhances clarity and aids in troubleshooting.
555-555: Enhanced error message to include error code.At line 555, the error message now includes the error code, which provides additional context when an
AlreadyExistserror occurs.
576-576: Improved error logging for test failure.Line 576 updates the
t.Fatalfmessage to specify "on #5", enhancing the clarity of which test case failed.
622-622: Enhanced error message to include error code.At line 622, incorporating the error code into the message when a
NotFounderror occurs during Remove operation improves debugging.
658-658: Enhanced error message to include error code.Line 658 follows the same pattern, enhancing the remove operation's error message with the error code for better diagnostics.
709-709: Enhanced error message to include error code.At line 709, including the error code in the
AlreadyExistserror message during Upsert operation aids in identifying the specific error encountered.charts/vald/templates/_helpers.tpl (1)
702-702: Addition ofimagePullPolicytoinitContainersenhances configurabilityIncluding
imagePullPolicy: {{ .imagePullPolicy }}allows users to specify the image pull policy for init containers, ensuring consistency with the main containers and providing better control over image updates..gitfiles (6)
170-171: New gRPC service files added formetaYou have added
apis/grpc/v1/meta/meta.pb.goandmeta_vtproto.pb.go. Ensure that these generated files are up-to-date with the.protodefinitions and that the corresponding service implementations are properly integrated.
226-226: Update Swagger documentation formetaserviceThe Swagger file
apis/swagger/v1/meta/meta.swagger.jsonhas been added. Ensure that the API endpoints are accurately documented and that the Swagger file is correctly generated from the Protobuf definitions.
1034-1034: Ensure error handling is comprehensive for USEARCHThe file
internal/errors/usearch.gohas been introduced. Verify that all potential error cases in the USEARCH implementation are properly handled and that meaningful error messages are provided.
1922-1925: Review the Rustmetaservice implementationAdded Rust files under
rust/bin/meta/for themetaservice. Ensure that the implementation adheres to Rust coding standards, includes necessary documentation, and integrates seamlessly with existing modules.
1946-1946: Check generated Rust Protobuf code formetaThe file
rust/libs/proto/src/meta.v1.tonic.rshas been generated. Please verify that the Protobuf code correctly reflects the.protodefinitions and that there are no discrepancies.
2002-2002: AddUSEARCH_VERSIONto version managementThe version file
versions/USEARCH_VERSIONhas been added. Confirm that this aligns with the project's versioning scheme and that any dependencies on USEARCH are correctly configured.pkg/gateway/lb/handler/grpc/handler.go (1)
Line range hint
1751-1755: Potential Issue with Zero Timestamp HandlingThe condition
if req.GetConfig().GetTimestamp() > 0excludes the case when the timestamp is zero. If a timestamp of zero is valid and should be accepted, this change may cause requests with a zero timestamp to default to the current time, potentially altering the intended behavior.Run the following script to check if zero is a valid timestamp in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Zero Timestamp Handling is Correct
The condition
if req.GetConfig().GetTimestamp() > 0correctly treats a zero timestamp as invalid and defaults to the current time. Existing codebase usage indicates that a zero timestamp is used to represent an unset or default value.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for code that sets timestamp to zero to determine if zero is a valid timestamp. rg --type go --no-filename 'Timestamp\s*=\s*0'Length of output: 340
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all function and method definitions that involve Timestamp to understand its usage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func $$($_) { $$$$ Timestamp $$$_ $$$$ }'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all function and method definitions that reference Timestamp in any capacity to understand its usage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func $$($_) { $$$$ $_Timestamp$$ $$$$ }'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for conditional statements that involve Timestamp to determine how zero values are handled. rg --type go 'Timestamp\s*(==|!=|>|<|>=|<=)\s*0'Length of output: 1106
| image: "pyroscope/pyroscope:latest" | ||
| imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent | ||
| imagePullPolicy: Always |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a specific version tag instead of latest
The current configuration uses the latest tag for the Pyroscope image. Combined with imagePullPolicy: Always, this could lead to unexpected updates and potential instability in your deployment.
Consider using a specific version tag for the Pyroscope image. This would provide better control over updates and ensure consistency across your environments. For example:
image: "pyroscope/pyroscope:0.37.0" # Replace with the desired version
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresentThis change would allow you to explicitly control when to update the Pyroscope version, reducing the risk of unexpected behavior due to automatic updates.
| @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ | |||
| - "/tmp/config.yaml" | |||
| securityContext: {} | |||
| image: "pyroscope/pyroscope:latest" | |||
| imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent | |||
| imagePullPolicy: Always | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Use a specific version tag instead of latest for the Pyroscope image
Using the latest tag in combination with imagePullPolicy: Always can lead to unpredictable deployments, as the image may update without explicit version control. To ensure stability and consistency in your deployments, it's advisable to specify a particular version of the Pyroscope image.
- Recommendation: Update the image tag to a specific version, for example,
pyroscope/pyroscope:1.8.0. - Benefit: This provides better control over the deployed versions and reduces the risk of unexpected changes affecting your environment.
🔗 Analysis chain
Confirm the necessity of Always image pull policy
The imagePullPolicy for the Pyroscope container has been changed from IfNotPresent to Always. This change ensures that the container image is always pulled from the registry, even if it already exists on the node.
While this can ensure you're always running the latest version, it may increase deployment time and network usage. Consider if this is necessary for your use case, especially if you're using a specific version tag (not latest) for the Pyroscope image.
To ensure this change aligns with your deployment strategy, please confirm:
- Are you frequently updating the Pyroscope image?
- Is the additional pull time and potential increase in network usage acceptable?
- Have you considered using a specific version tag instead of
latestto have more control over updates?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the image tag being used
grep -A 1 'image: "pyroscope/pyroscope' k8s/metrics/pyroscope/base/deployment.yaml
Length of output: 164
| func ToString[T CodeType](c T) string { | ||
| switch Code(c) { | ||
| case OK: | ||
| return "OK" | ||
| case Canceled: | ||
| return "Canceled" | ||
| case Unknown: | ||
| return "Unknown" | ||
| case InvalidArgument: | ||
| return "InvalidArgument" | ||
| case DeadlineExceeded: | ||
| return "DeadlineExceeded" | ||
| case NotFound: | ||
| return "NotFound" | ||
| case AlreadyExists: | ||
| return "AlreadyExists" | ||
| case PermissionDenied: | ||
| return "PermissionDenied" | ||
| case ResourceExhausted: | ||
| return "ResourceExhausted" | ||
| case FailedPrecondition: | ||
| return "FailedPrecondition" | ||
| case Aborted: | ||
| return "Aborted" | ||
| case OutOfRange: | ||
| return "OutOfRange" | ||
| case Unimplemented: | ||
| return "Unimplemented" | ||
| case Internal: | ||
| return "Internal" | ||
| case Unavailable: | ||
| return "Unavailable" | ||
| case DataLoss: | ||
| return "DataLoss" | ||
| case Unauthenticated: | ||
| return "Unauthenticated" | ||
| default: | ||
| return "InvalidStatus" | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
LGTM: Well-implemented ToString function with room for optimization
The ToString function is well-implemented and correctly handles all predefined gRPC status codes. It's generic and type-safe, which is great. However, there's room for potential optimization:
- Consider using a map for constant-time lookup instead of a switch statement. This could improve performance, especially if this function is called frequently.
- The map could be initialized once at package level, reducing the overhead of creating it on each function call.
Here's a suggested optimization:
var codeToString = map[Code]string{
OK: "OK",
Canceled: "Canceled",
Unknown: "Unknown",
InvalidArgument: "InvalidArgument",
DeadlineExceeded: "DeadlineExceeded",
NotFound: "NotFound",
AlreadyExists: "AlreadyExists",
PermissionDenied: "PermissionDenied",
ResourceExhausted: "ResourceExhausted",
FailedPrecondition: "FailedPrecondition",
Aborted: "Aborted",
OutOfRange: "OutOfRange",
Unimplemented: "Unimplemented",
Internal: "Internal",
Unavailable: "Unavailable",
DataLoss: "DataLoss",
Unauthenticated: "Unauthenticated",
}
func ToString[T CodeType](c T) string {
if str, ok := codeToString[Code(c)]; ok {
return str
}
return "InvalidStatus"
}This optimization would make the function more efficient and easier to maintain, as adding new codes would only require updating the map.
| @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ spec: | |||
| - args: | |||
| - -config.file=/etc/loki/loki.yaml | |||
| image: grafana/loki:2.0.0 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider updating Loki version
While not directly related to the changes in this PR, I noticed that the Loki image version is set to 2.0.0:
image: grafana/loki:2.0.0This version is quite old, as Loki has had several major releases since then. Consider updating to a more recent version to benefit from bug fixes, performance improvements, and new features.
If there are no specific reasons to stick with this version, consider updating to the latest stable version of Loki. You can check the latest version and its changelog on the Loki GitHub releases page.
| @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ spec: | |||
| - name: JAEGER_AGENT_PORT | |||
| value: "" | |||
| image: grafana/tempo-query:latest | |||
| imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent | |||
| imagePullPolicy: Always | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Concern Confirmed: Image Tags are Set to latest
Both grafana/tempo and grafana/tempo-query containers have their imagePullPolicy set to Always with the image tags specified as latest. While this ensures that the most recent images are always pulled, it can lead to unpredictability and inconsistencies in deployment environments. It's recommended to pin images to specific versions in production to enhance stability and reproducibility.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approved: Updated imagePullPolicy to Always for tempo-query
This change is consistent with the previous one, ensuring both containers in the deployment use the same image pull policy. This maintains consistency across the deployment.
While using Always ensures the latest images, consider pinning specific versions in production environments for better control and reproducibility. To verify current image tags, run:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the image tags for Tempo and Tempo-query
rg --type yaml 'image:\s*grafana/tempo' -A 1
rg --type yaml 'image:\s*grafana/tempo-query' -A 1
Length of output: 127257
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the image tags for Tempo and Tempo-query
rg --type yaml 'image:\s*grafana/tempo' -A 1
rg --type yaml 'image:\s*grafana/tempo-query' -A 1
Length of output: 504
kpango
deleted the
backport/release/v1.7/refactor/main/for-release-v1.7.14
branch
Description
This PR includes Six refactorings
a. Expose error detail TypeNames
b. Add error detail merge functionality to status.WithDetails function.
Related Issue
Versions
Checklist
Special notes for your reviewer
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
imagePullPolicysettings for various containers to ensure the latest images are always pulled.Version Updates