-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(azure service)!: Retrieve .inner() from SensitiveString for Azure ConnectionString #15225
fix(azure service)!: Retrieve .inner() from SensitiveString for Azure ConnectionString #15225
Conversation
azure_common::config::build_client requires a String not a SensitiveString, in the conversion using to_string() we were accidentally converting to the sensitive value to **REDACTED**. This fixes it by using the same method that seems to have been used in the PR that introduced this change: vectordotdev#14305 to call `.inner()` to retrieve the value from inside the struct and then converts that to a String.
❌ Deploy Preview for vrl-playground failed.
|
✅ Deploy Preview for vector-project ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
Regression Test Results
Baseline: ecdc5ab Explanation
A regression test is an integrated performance test for
The table below, if present, lists those experiments that have experienced a
statistically significant change in their No interesting changes in Fine details of change detection per experiment.
|
Soak Test ResultsBaseline: ecdc5ab ExplanationA soak test is an integrated performance test for vector in a repeatable rig, with varying configuration for vector. What follows is a statistical summary of a brief vector run for each configuration across SHAs given above. The goal of these tests are to determine, quickly, if vector performance is changed and to what degree by a pull request. Where appropriate units are scaled per-core. The table below, if present, lists those experiments that have experienced a statistically significant change in their throughput performance between baseline and comparision SHAs, with 90.0% confidence OR have been detected as newly erratic. Negative values mean that baseline is faster, positive comparison. Results that do not exhibit more than a ±8.87% change in mean throughput are discarded. An experiment is erratic if its coefficient of variation is greater than 0.3. The abbreviated table will be omitted if no interesting changes are observed. Changes in throughput with confidence ≥ 90.00% and absolute Δ mean >= ±8.87%:
Fine details of change detection per experiment.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good find!
The change is obviously simple, but CI was having some issues so I'll try and shepherd that along until it all passes so that we can get this merged. 👍🏻
Woops, realized the integration tests never ran for this PR. Just kicked those off, and that should hopefully be done in 20-30 minutes. |
@tobz thanks, it would be great appreciated to get this fix out and released :-) |
… ConnectionString (#15225) Retrieve .inner() from SensitiveString for Azure ConnectionString azure_common::config::build_client requires a String not a SensitiveString, in the conversion using to_string() we were accidentally converting to the sensitive value to **REDACTED**. This fixes it by using the same method that seems to have been used in the PR that introduced this change: #14305 to call `.inner()` to retrieve the value from inside the struct and then converts that to a String.
Just a heads up that this PR doesn't seem to be breaking, but was marked as such with the |
…ConnectionString (#15225) Retrieve .inner() from SensitiveString for Azure ConnectionString azure_common::config::build_client requires a String not a SensitiveString, in the conversion using to_string() we were accidentally converting to the sensitive value to **REDACTED**. This fixes it by using the same method that seems to have been used in the PR that introduced this change: #14305 to call `.inner()` to retrieve the value from inside the struct and then converts that to a String. Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <jesse.szwedko@datadoghq.com>
azure_common::config::build_client
requires a String not a SensitiveString, in the conversion using to_string() we were accidentally converting to the sensitive value to**REDACTED**
.This fixes it by using the same method that seems to have been used in the PR that introduced this change: #14305 to call
.inner()
to retrieve the value from inside the struct and then converts that to a String.Closes: #15214
Related: