[NEXT-1181] DynamicServerError: Dynamic server usage: cookies #49373
Comments
timneutkens
added
the
linear: next
timneutkens
changed the title
|
Am getting this issue too. @timneutkens do you have any guidance on workarounds prior to this being fixed? I couldn't find docs about how to use the |
|
I have a similar issue Error: Dynamic server usage: cookies When I removed But we need this during static page generation on the build, right? |
|
I solved this problem simply by adding this line to the app/layout.tsx file |
Is that the correct way? |
|
any update? |
|
Force dynamic prevents any static rendering. Static rendering was working for pages using "cookies" previously (at least, it appeared to be). |
|
I had a similar problem with function isDraftModeTrue(): boolean {
try {
const {isEnabled} = draftMode()
return isEnabled;
} catch (error) {
return false;
}
}const isDraftMode: boolean = isDraftModeTrue();
if(isDraftMode){
// fetch some data and set header with jummy cookie data
}I think you could do the same only for cookies. function isCookieAvailable(): boolean {
try {
const cookieStore = cookies();
return true;
} catch (error) {
return false;
}
}I just started with next.js. I know it doesn't make sense to access cookies when the pages are getting pre-generated, but I also didnt't figure out a better way to solve this. |
|
The
|
|
any work around? |
|
I'm getting this error too, I managed to squelch the error but it still didn't compile any api route pages :( So far I've tried - export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic' in both page and layout files and in api routes |
|
Same problem here. export async function generateStaticParams() {
return LANGUAGES.map((lng) => ({ lng }));
}Any redirects to pages that either use Removing the code from the Any suggestions on how to fix that? |
|
The same happens for other "dynamic" opt-in functions like |
|
This solution temporarily fixed the issue, but we need to remove after bug fix. I also noticed that the dynamicParams to False is also in trouble. This reflects the "fallback" used in ISR. |
Im facing same here |
|
It throws an error on the page with If I remove the I'm using 13.4.7 and a downgrade to 13.4.6 and 13.4.3 did not help. |
|
Facing this app router next 13.4.5: in route.ts |
|
I solved it by adding |
|
@DanielhCarranza wouldn't it opt the layout out of the static generation? |
facing this in a route. did add this as well as for now, it seems to work. but during build, the warning's still there. Any fix for this? |
export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic';
export const revalidate = 0;This helps with dev server on initial load, but any change to any file immediately shows this: |
You are correct as far as I understand either a page is static or dynamic. I used to think we can mix those components to get best of both worlds. |
|
Thank you! That's good to know – that was my understanding too, but guess that's not right. |
As far as I'm aware, you can mix static and dynamic down to the layout level, ie, a layout could be static, with dynamically pages iirc. I may be wrong though. |
|
Just had this issue today after upgrading my package.json. Can confirm that exporing "force-dynamic" makes the issue go away |
I do have the same specific error case with |
I added If I add it to layout.js, it gives that error: Please make sure that all your non-static routes export the following edge runtime route segment config:
export const runtime = 'edge';If I convert the runtime to edge, it gives that error (only server components): Invariant: Method expects to have requestAsyncStorageIssue detail: #45371 (comment) import { cookies } from 'next/headers';
import { cache } from 'react';
import { createServerComponentClient } from '@supabase/auth-helpers-nextjs';
export const dynamic = "force-dynamic" //clodflare solution
export const createServerSupabaseClient = cache(() =>
createServerComponentClient({ cookies })
)
export async function getSession() {
const supabase = createServerSupabaseClient()
try {
const {
data: { session }
} = await supabase.auth.getSession()
return session
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error:', error)
return null
}
} |
|
@emrecoban I only needed to add it to one single page (as seen in my code above) |
|
@emrecoban I added to all the pages I was experiencing the message. |
|
Interesting, I got the error while using cookies inside another function from my Page. If I make a call to cookies directly in the page component it's fine. |
Interesting. I am using import { cookies } from 'next/headers';
import { createServerComponentClient } from '@supabase/auth-helpers-nextjs';
export default async function Dashboard() {
const supabase = createServerComponentClient({ cookies })
async function getSession() {
try {
const {
data: { session }
} = await supabase.auth.getSession()
return session
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error:', error)
return null
}
}
const serverSession = await getSession()
const userInfo = serverSession?.user
return ()
}Error message: Error: Invariant: Method expects to have requestAsyncStorage, none available |
That's exactly what I have right now, having cookies import directly in the page same as you and it works. Can you try to upgrade your dependencies ? I can only extrapolate on what is going on here, nextjs build system is maybe trying to asserts things statically by analysing the code. By having cookies import in the page.tsx directly, it is analysed as valid. |
|
by the way my code was working correctly before, it has to be since a specific next version. |
|
@mbret thanks for the response. Everything is up to dated (#52176 (comment)). I guess |
to be fair, app router is not stable yet, I decided to try a new project on it and I regret already. It's very early and hard to get help. My workaround in your case is to use the client component which work correctly instead. You will lose your SSR optimization but you can still retrieve your session on client side. |
|
Hey all, I had a look into the reproduction provided on the initial issue post. It seems the reason that it doesn't work in the urql case is that it uses setTimeout / out of band promises quite a bit. The reason you can call The case that you're running into is different though, it seems the Changing the code to something like this will work: import { cacheExchange, Client, createClient, fetchExchange } from "@urql/core";
import { authExchange } from "@urql/exchange-auth";
import { cookies } from "next/headers";
export const getAccessToken = async (cookie: string) => {
const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:3000/api/auth/access-token`, {
cache: "no-store",
headers: {
cookie,
},
});
if (res.status === 401) {
throw new Error("Forbidden");
}
return (await res.json()) as { accessToken: string };
};
export const getClient = () => {
const cookie = cookies()
.getAll()
.map((c) => `${c.name}=${c.value}`)
.join(";");
return createClient({
url: `https://graphql-pokeapi.graphcdn.app/`,
fetchOptions: {
cache: "no-store",
},
requestPolicy: "network-only",
exchanges: [
cacheExchange,
authExchange(async (utils) => {
const { accessToken: token } = await getAccessToken(cookie);
return {
addAuthToOperation: (operation) => {
if (!token) {
return operation;
}
return utils.appendHeaders(operation, {
Authorization: `Bearer ${token}`,
});
},
didAuthError(error) {
return error.graphQLErrors.some(
(e) => e.extensions?.code === "UNAUTHENTICATED"
);
},
async refreshAuth() {
const { accessToken: token } = await getAccessToken();
},
};
}),
fetchExchange,
],
});
};Codesandbox with the changes running the production build: https://k7q35k-3000.csb.app/ However I think this is still a bug in urql as well so I'll dig a bit deeper into that. The reason that adding I'll have a look into the Supabase case as well, seems like it's potentially similar to the urql case where something is not bound to the same call stack. We'll also work on improving the error / guidance around why the error happens. What would be super helpful is if you can provide a GitHub repository or Codesandbox when running into this. I'm expecting most people on this thread to be running into different issues that has the same outcome. I.e. I've seen cases where awaiting promises was forgotten and such that also cause this. |
|
The issue was solved through this way: #45371 (comment) import { cookies } from 'next/headers';
import { cache } from 'react';
import { createServerComponentClient } from '@supabase/auth-helpers-nextjs';
export const createServerSupabaseClient = cache(() => {
const cookieStore = cookies()
return createServerComponentClient({ cookies: () => cookieStore })
})
export async function getSession() {
const supabase = createServerSupabaseClient()
try {
const {
data: { session }
} = await supabase.auth.getSession()
return session
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error:', error)
return null
}
} |
|
I am getting this same error while trying to use Supabase auth using Cookies in Next Here are my Supabase files for reference
import { createMiddlewareClient } from "@supabase/auth-helpers-nextjs";
import { NextResponse } from "next/server";
export async function middleware(req) {
const res = NextResponse.next();
const supabase = createMiddlewareClient({ req, res });
await supabase.auth.getSession();
return res;
}
import { createRouteHandlerClient } from "@supabase/auth-helpers-nextjs";
import { cookies } from "next/headers";
import { NextResponse } from "next/server";
export async function GET(request) {
const requestUrl = new URL(request.url);
const code = requestUrl.searchParams.get("code");
if (code) {
const supabase = createRouteHandlerClient({ cookies });
await supabase.auth.exchangeCodeForSession(code);
}
// URL to redirect to after sign in process completes
return NextResponse.redirect(requestUrl.origin);
}
import { createServerComponentClient } from "@supabase/auth-helpers-nextjs";
import { redirect } from "next/navigation";
import { cookies } from "next/headers";
export default async function Home() {
const supabase = createServerComponentClient({
cookies,
});
const {
data: { session },
} = await supabase.auth.getSession();
if (!session) {
redirect("/signup");
} else {
redirect("/dashboard");
}
return <div></div>;
} |
|
Going from to fixed it for me. |
|
Thanks @arthureberledev, this fixed it! |
that's also how I fixed it. well done |
When using imports from `next/headers` in a layout or page, `StaticGenerationBailout` will throw an error to indicate Next.js should fallback to dynamic rendering. However, when async context is lost, this error is uncaught and leads to a confusing error message at build time. This attempts to improve DX surrounding this error by linking out to a page that explains when it might happen. I've also tweaked `StaticGenerationBailout` to always throw a fully descriptive reason as opposed to just `DynamicServerError: Dynamic server usage: cookies` Closes NEXT-1181 Fixes #49373 --------- Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
This closed issue has been automatically locked because it had no new activity for 2 weeks. If you are running into a similar issue, please create a new issue with the steps to reproduce. Thank you. |
and others
Verify canary release
Provide environment information
Operating System: Platform: darwin Arch: arm64 Version: Darwin Kernel Version 22.4.0: Mon Mar 6 20:59:28 PST 2023; root:xnu-8796.101.5~3/RELEASE_ARM64_T6000 Binaries: Node: 16.13.2 npm: 9.3.0 Yarn: 1.22.19 pnpm: 7.25.1 Relevant packages: next: 13.4.1 eslint-config-next: 13.3.0 react: 18.2.0 react-dom: 18.2.0Which area(s) of Next.js are affected? (leave empty if unsure)
App directory (appDir: true)
Link to the code that reproduces this issue
https://github.com/focux/next-cookies-bug
To Reproduce
npm run buildDescribe the Bug
After upgrading to Next from
13.3.5to13.4.1, I'm getting a lot of errors that say:The app works good when running it on development mode.
Expected Behavior
According to the docs, using the
cookiesfunction automatically opt-ins my pages to dynamic rendering.So I would expect the build to succeed as before and also those errors to be clearer to at least know in what page is originating.
Which browser are you using? (if relevant)
No response
How are you deploying your application? (if relevant)
No response
NEXT-1181
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: