-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(turbopack): Rewrite CollectiblesSource callsites to use OperationVc (part 2/3) #74168
Open
bgw
wants to merge
1
commit into
canary
Choose a base branch
from
bgw/operationvc-collectibles-migration-pt2
base: canary
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+73
−23
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ijjk
added
created-by: Turbopack team
PRs by the Turbopack team.
Turbopack
Related to Turbopack with Next.js.
labels
Dec 20, 2024
This was referenced Dec 20, 2024
Merged
Failing test suitesCommit: d36441f
Expand output● ReactRefreshRequire › propagates a hot update to closest accepted module
Read more about building and testing Next.js in contributing.md. |
Stats from current PRDefault BuildGeneral
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
Client Pages
Client Build Manifests
Rendered Page Sizes
Edge SSR bundle Size
Middleware size
Next Runtimes
build cache
Diff detailsDiff for main-HASH.jsDiff too large to display |
bgw
changed the base branch from
bgw/operationvc-collectibles-migration-pt1
to
graphite-base/74168
December 20, 2024 04:09
bgw
force-pushed
the
graphite-base/74168
branch
from
December 20, 2024 04:09
9a73684
to
ad2282d
Compare
bgw
force-pushed
the
bgw/operationvc-collectibles-migration-pt2
branch
from
December 20, 2024 04:09
ee9840c
to
ab2f916
Compare
bgw
force-pushed
the
bgw/operationvc-collectibles-migration-pt2
branch
from
December 20, 2024 04:10
ab2f916
to
fc3c612
Compare
…ationVc (part 2/3)
bgw
force-pushed
the
bgw/operationvc-collectibles-migration-pt2
branch
from
January 3, 2025 01:49
fc3c612
to
d36441f
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
OperationVc
s should be used withCollectiblesSource
instead ofVc
s because collectibles represent a side-effect or implicit extra return value of a function's execution.