Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add ijjk as a codeowner #259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2022
Merged

chore: add ijjk as a codeowner #259

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2022

Conversation

styfle
Copy link
Member

@styfle styfle commented Jan 5, 2022

Luc and Timer haven't work on nft in a couple years so adding ijjk as a codeowner

@styfle styfle requested a review from ijjk January 5, 2022 22:58
@styfle styfle requested review from lucleray and Timer as code owners January 5, 2022 22:58
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #259 (4a948c6) into main (cf453a5) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #259   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.64%   80.64%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        1452     1452           
  Branches      540      540           
=======================================
  Hits         1171     1171           
  Misses        116      116           
  Partials      165      165           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cf453a5...4a948c6. Read the comment docs.

@styfle styfle enabled auto-merge (squash) January 5, 2022 23:09
@styfle styfle merged commit 858209a into main Jan 5, 2022
@styfle styfle deleted the ijjk-codeowner branch January 5, 2022 23:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants