-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
turbo-ignore
do not work on a single repo
#8172
Comments
turbo-ignore
do not work on a single Next.js appturbo-ignore
do not work on a single repo
Hey @devjiwonchoi thanks for the report. This shouldn't straight up fail, so we can fix that. However using |
@tknickman Thank you for the fix! I came across from this video by Anthony where it introduces to use As I'm benefitting so much from I think it's feasible.. or maybe I misunderstood the feature? |
That's awesome you're benefiting from
|
### Description Single package repo dry runs can not include a packages key at all. Fixes #8172 ### Testing Instructions <!-- Give a quick description of steps to test your changes. -->
Ah, understood. Thank you for your kind explanation!! |
No problem - thanks again for the report of the issue! |
### Description Single package repo dry runs can not include a packages key at all. Fixes vercel#8172 ### Testing Instructions <!-- Give a quick description of steps to test your changes. -->
Verify canary release
Link to code that reproduces this issue
https://github.com/devjiwonchoi/repro-turbo-ignore-single-app
What package manager are you using / does the bug impact?
pnpm
What operating system are you using?
Mac
Which canary version will you have in your reproduction?
turbo 1.13.4-canary.4
Describe the Bug
Context: Using
turbo
on a single Next.js app (non-monorepo)turbo build --dry json
returns thepackages
as undefined, so it throws an error as below:Expected Behavior
In
tuborepo
, we need to add logic to include a single repo topackages
value as well.To Reproduce
Run the following commands:
Confirm that the
packages
value is missingAdditional context
x-ref: #8171
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: