Minor fixes: strip json response from llm #189
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new utility function Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Relevant users for this PR:
Ignoring following files due to large size: - vibi-dpu/src/graph/utils.rs Auto assigning to relevant reviewers. If you are a relevant reviewer, you can use the Vibinex browser extension to see parts of the PR relevant to you To change comment and auto-assign settings, go to your Vibinex settings page. |
|
Diff Graph: Call Stack Diff%%{init: { 'theme': 'neutral', 'themeVariables': { 'fontSize': '20px' }, 'flowchart': { 'nodeSpacing': 100, 'rankSpacing': 100 } } }%%
flowchart LR
classDef modified stroke:black,fill:yellow
classDef added stroke:black,fill:#b7e892,color:black
classDef deleted stroke:black,fill:red
To modify DiffGraph settings, go to your Vibinex settings page. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
vibi-dpu/src/graph/utils.rs (1)
203-212: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.The
strip_json_prefixfunction is well-implemented and correctly extracts JSON content from code blocks. However, to improve maintainability and usability, consider adding documentation comments explaining the function's purpose, parameters, and return value.Here's a suggested documentation comment:
/// Extracts JSON content from a string enclosed in "```json" and "```" markers. /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `json_str` - A string slice that may contain JSON content enclosed in markers. /// /// # Returns /// /// * `Some(&str)` - The extracted JSON content if markers are found. /// * `None` - If the markers are not found or the content is not properly enclosed. pub fn strip_json_prefix(json_str: &str) -> Option<&str> { // ... (existing implementation) }vibi-dpu/src/graph/file_imports.rs (1)
Line range hint
349-363: Reminder: Address incomplete TODO itemsThe PR objectives mention that eventing functionality has not been tested and unit/integration tests have not been added or are not running. These items should be addressed before considering the PR complete.
Would you like assistance in generating test cases or setting up the testing infrastructure?
vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_line_range.rs (2)
184-187: LGTM: Improved JSON response handlingThe addition of JSON prefix stripping logic enhances the robustness of API response handling. This change should help prevent deserialization errors caused by unexpected prefixes in the JSON response.
Consider adding a debug log statement when a JSON prefix is stripped, which could be useful for troubleshooting:
if let Some(stripped_json) = strip_json_prefix(&prompt_response) { + log::debug!("JSON prefix stripped from API response"); prompt_response = stripped_json.to_string(); }
Line range hint
1-524: Consider adding unit tests for the new JSON prefix stripping logicThe changes made to improve JSON response handling are good, but given the complexity of this file and the critical nature of correctly parsing API responses, it would be beneficial to add unit tests specifically for the new JSON prefix stripping logic. This will help ensure that the function behaves correctly with various input scenarios, including:
- Responses with no JSON prefix
- Responses with a JSON prefix
- Malformed JSON responses
Adding these tests will increase confidence in the robustness of the code and help catch any potential regressions in the future.
Would you like assistance in drafting some example unit tests for this new functionality?
vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_name.rs (3)
4-4: Remove Unused ImportsOn line 4, you import
call_llm_api,read_file, andstrip_json_prefixfromsuper::utils. Ensure that all imported functions are used within this file. If any of them are unused, consider removing them to keep the code clean and maintainable.
93-95: Simplifyprompt_responseAssignmentReassigning
prompt_responsewithin theif letblock can be simplified for better readability and to avoid shadowing variables.You can refactor the code using a
matchexpression:prompt_response = match strip_json_prefix(&prompt_response) { Some(stripped_json) => stripped_json.to_string(), None => prompt_response, };This approach ensures that
prompt_responseis explicitly handled in both cases, improving code clarity.
102-105: Log When Function Name Is EmptyWhen the function name is empty, the method returns
Nonewithout any logging. This could make debugging difficult if unexpectedNonevalues are encountered.Consider adding a log statement before returning
Noneto aid in debugging:if func_name.get_function_name().is_empty() { log::warn!("Received empty function name for code line: {}", code_line); return None; }vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_call.rs (1)
181-183: Consider renamingtrim_empty_function_callsfor clarityThe method
trim_empty_function_callseffectively removes function calls with empty names. For better clarity and to follow Rust naming conventions, consider renaming it toremove_empty_function_callsorretain_valid_function_callsto more accurately reflect its functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- vibi-dpu/src/graph/file_imports.rs (3 hunks)
- vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_call.rs (3 hunks)
- vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_line_range.rs (2 hunks)
- vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_name.rs (2 hunks)
- vibi-dpu/src/graph/utils.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
vibi-dpu/src/graph/utils.rs (2)
Line range hint
1-315: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe changes in this file improve JSON handling with the new
strip_json_prefixfunction and enhance the readability of theget_extension_mapfunction. Here's a summary of the review:
- The
strip_json_prefixfunction is well-implemented but could benefit from documentation.- The
get_extension_mapfunction has improved readability with categorized comments, but there are questions about the commented-out config and data format extensions.Regarding the PR objectives:
- The build is reported to be running successfully, which aligns with the code changes observed.
- Manual QA has been performed, but it's important to note that eventing functionality and unit/integration tests have not been addressed in this file.
To ensure the changes don't introduce any regressions, consider:
- Adding unit tests for the new
strip_json_prefixfunction.- Verifying that the commented-out extensions in
get_extension_mapdon't affect other parts of the system.Here's a script to check for existing tests related to these functions:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing tests for the modified functions # Test: Search for test functions related to strip_json_prefix and get_extension_map echo "Searching for existing tests:" rg --type rust '#\[test\].*fn.*(strip_json_prefix|get_extension_map)'This will help identify if there are any existing tests that need to be updated or if new tests should be added to cover the changes.
Line range hint
214-315: Improved readability with categorized commentsThe addition of comments categorizing file extensions enhances code readability and organization. This change is beneficial for maintaining and understanding the extension map.
However, I noticed that some config and data format extensions (json, yaml, toml, ini, config) are commented out. Could you clarify the reason for excluding these formats? If they're intended to be included later, consider adding a TODO comment explaining the plan for these extensions.
To verify the impact of these commented-out extensions, let's run the following script:
This will help us understand if these extensions are used elsewhere in the codebase and if their exclusion might affect other parts of the system.
vibi-dpu/src/graph/file_imports.rs (2)
349-352: LGTM: Improved robustness in handling API responsesThe addition of
strip_json_prefixenhances the method's ability to handle potential JSON prefixes in the API response, making it more robust.
361-363: Verify the logic for returning NoneThe condition to return
Nonewhenpossible_file_pathis not empty seems counterintuitive. Typically, we would expect to return a result when a file path is found. Can you please verify if this logic is correct or if it should be inverted?vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_line_range.rs (1)
7-7: LGTM: New utility function import addedThe addition of
strip_json_prefixfrom theutilsmodule is a good improvement. This function will likely be used to clean up JSON responses from the API, which can help prevent parsing errors and improve the robustness of the code.vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_call.rs (2)
7-7: Importingstrip_json_prefixenhances response handlingAdding
strip_json_prefixto the imports ensures that any unwanted JSON prefixes from the LLM responses are properly handled before deserialization.
299-301: Handle cases whenstrip_json_prefixreturnsNoneCurrently, if
strip_json_prefixreturnsNone, the originalprompt_responseis used for deserialization. Ensure thatprompt_responsewithout stripping is always valid JSON to prevent potential deserialization errors.Run the following script to check if there are instances where
strip_json_prefixreturnsNoneand could lead to deserialization issues:
|
Relevant users for this PR:
Ignoring following files due to large size: - vibi-dpu/src/graph/utils.rs Auto assigning to relevant reviewers. If you are a relevant reviewer, you can use the Vibinex browser extension to see parts of the PR relevant to you To change comment and auto-assign settings, go to your Vibinex settings page. |
|
Relevant users for this PR:
Ignoring following files due to large size: - vibi-dpu/src/graph/utils.rs Auto assigning to relevant reviewers. If you are a relevant reviewer, you can use the Vibinex browser extension to see parts of the PR relevant to you To change comment and auto-assign settings, go to your Vibinex settings page. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_name.rs (1)
106-106: Improved caching mechanismGreat job on improving the caching mechanism by trimming the code line before using it as a cache key. This addresses the concern raised in the previous review and helps avoid cache misses due to leading or trailing whitespace differences.
For even better cache efficiency, consider a more comprehensive normalization of the code line. For example:
let normalized_code_line = code_line.split_whitespace().collect::<Vec<&str>>().join(" "); self.cached_output.insert(normalized_code_line, func_name.get_function_name().to_string());This approach would normalize internal whitespace as well, further reducing potential cache misses.
vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_call.rs (1)
181-183: LGTM: New method to trim empty function callsThe
trim_empty_function_callsmethod is a good addition for filtering out empty function calls. This improves the quality of the output data.Consider using
is_empty()instead of comparing with an empty string for slightly better readability:pub fn trim_empty_function_calls(&mut self) { - self.function_calls.retain(|func_call| !func_call.function_name().is_empty()); + self.function_calls.retain(|func_call| !func_call.function_name().is_empty()); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_call.rs (3 hunks)
- vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_name.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_name.rs (3)
4-4: Improved JSON response handlingThe introduction of the
strip_json_prefixfunction and its usage infunction_name_in_lineis a good improvement. It addresses the potential issue of unwanted prefixes in the API response, which could cause deserialization errors.The implementation correctly handles the case when
strip_json_prefixreturnsNone, addressing the concern raised in the previous review. Good job on implementing this improvement!Also applies to: 92-95
102-105: Improved error handling and result validationThe changes to the
function_name_in_linemethod signature and the addition of the empty function name check are excellent improvements:
- Returning
Option<FunctionNameOutput>allows for more explicit error handling.- The check for an empty function name (lines 103-105) prevents returning invalid results.
These changes enhance the robustness and reliability of the function. Well done!
Line range hint
1-107: Overall assessment: Significant improvementsThis pull request introduces several valuable enhancements to the
function_name_in_linemethod:
- Improved JSON response handling with the
strip_json_prefixfunction.- Better error handling and result validation with
Option<FunctionNameOutput>return type and empty function name check.- Enhanced caching mechanism with trimmed code lines as keys.
These changes address previous review concerns and improve the overall robustness and efficiency of the code. Great work on implementing these improvements!
A minor suggestion for further optimization has been provided regarding the caching mechanism, but it's not critical for this PR.
vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_call.rs (3)
7-7: LGTM: New utility function importThe addition of
strip_json_prefixto the imports is a good step towards improving JSON response handling, aligning with the PR objective.
298-312: LGTM: Improved JSON handling and empty function call filteringThese changes effectively address the PR objective of stripping JSON responses from LLM and improve the handling of empty function calls. The order of operations (trimming empty calls before checking for emptiness) now correctly addresses the issue mentioned in the past review comments.
298-312: Overall improvements look good, consider adding testsThe changes effectively improve JSON response handling and empty function call filtering, aligning well with the PR objectives. These modifications enhance the robustness of the code without introducing apparent negative impacts.
Given the importance of these changes, consider adding unit tests to verify the behavior of
strip_json_prefixandtrim_empty_function_callsto ensure their correctness and prevent future regressions.To verify the impact of these changes, you can run the following script:
|
Relevant users for this PR:
Ignoring following files due to large size: - vibi-dpu/src/graph/utils.rs Auto assigning to relevant reviewers. If you are a relevant reviewer, you can use the Vibinex browser extension to see parts of the PR relevant to you To change comment and auto-assign settings, go to your Vibinex settings page. |
|
Diff Graph: Call Stack Diff%%{init: { 'theme': 'neutral', 'themeVariables': { 'fontSize': '20px' }, 'flowchart': { 'nodeSpacing': 100, 'rankSpacing': 100 } } }%%
flowchart LR
subgraph guwq ["vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_name.rs"]
aizl["serialize"]
click aizl href "https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/blob/347e0232e68f80744b61a4ebffcf05569125f71b/vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_name.rs#L3" _blank
end
subgraph wjpq ["vibi-dpu/src/graph/function_call.rs"]
nyqf["use crate::utils::review::Review;"]
class nyqf added
click nyqf href "https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-499dff2256982a954a6cffe0157343279647ec59d6bfe91363bb8f9f403c8db5R5" _blank
end
class wjpq green
subgraph yylp ["vibi-dpu/src/graph/graph_edges.rs"]
mkeb["process_func_defs"]
click mkeb href "https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/blob/347e0232e68f80744b61a4ebffcf05569125f71b/vibi-dpu/src/graph/graph_edges.rs#L382" _blank
flkt["incoming_edges"]
click flkt href "https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/blob/347e0232e68f80744b61a4ebffcf05569125f71b/vibi-dpu/src/graph/graph_edges.rs#L10" _blank
qmke["graph_edges"]
click qmke href "https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/blob/347e0232e68f80744b61a4ebffcf05569125f71b/vibi-dpu/src/graph/graph_edges.rs#L5" _blank
nnqt["main"]
click nnqt href "https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/blob/347e0232e68f80744b61a4ebffcf05569125f71b/vibi-dpu/src/graph/graph_edges.rs#L106" _blank
jrlf["outgoing_edges"]
click jrlf href "https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/blob/347e0232e68f80744b61a4ebffcf05569125f71b/vibi-dpu/src/graph/graph_edges.rs#L233" _blank
end
subgraph fxpt ["vibi-dpu/src/graph/utils.rs"]
igfv["absolute_to_relative_path"]
class igfv added
click igfv href "https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-67cb87ae3299e5b07d01fa9c672dbc6ce4510a62fa9b49fbffd9eb30f0acfd2cR189" _blank
end
class fxpt green
classDef modified stroke:black,fill:yellow
classDef added stroke:black,fill:#b7e892,color:black
classDef deleted stroke:black,fill:red
nyqf =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-499dff2256982a954a6cffe0157343279647ec59d6bfe91363bb8f9f403c8db5R7'>Line 7</a>" =====>aizl
qmke =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR120'>Line 120</a>" =====>igfv
mkeb =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR416'>Line 416</a>" =====>igfv
mkeb =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR421'>Line 421</a>" =====>igfv
nnqt =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR196'>Line 196</a>" =====>igfv
jrlf =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR277'>Line 277</a>" =====>igfv
qmke =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR204'>Line 204</a>" =====>igfv
qmke =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR207'>Line 207</a>" =====>igfv
mkeb =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR406'>Line 406</a>" =====>igfv
qmke =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR7'>Line 7</a>" =====>igfv
qmke =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR115'>Line 115</a>" =====>igfv
nnqt =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR216'>Line 216</a>" =====>igfv
flkt =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR218'>Line 218</a>" =====>igfv
jrlf =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR269'>Line 269</a>" =====>igfv
qmke =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR117'>Line 117</a>" =====>igfv
qmke =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR205'>Line 205</a>" =====>igfv
jrlf =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR254'>Line 254</a>" =====>igfv
qmke =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR211'>Line 211</a>" =====>igfv
jrlf =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR261'>Line 261</a>" =====>igfv
qmke =="<a target='_blank' href='https://github.com/vibinex/vibi-dpu/pull/189/files#diff-cb26ef0124afe8a7602309c82adcf54ffb0c67ae2a8d263a2bb1b0878fd3287dR5'>Line 5</a>" =====>igfv
linkStyle 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 stroke:green,stroke-width:8
To modify DiffGraph settings, go to your Vibinex settings page. |
Please check the action items covered in the PR -
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation