fix(plugin-react): process excluded files (fix #6921)

[ZYSzys]

Description

Do filter(id) on top of transform function to exclude files.

Fixes vitejs/vite-plugin-react#24

Additional context

---

What is the purpose of this pull request?

• Bug fix
• New Feature
• Documentation update
• Other

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

• Read the Contributing Guidelines.
• Read the Pull Request Guidelines and follow the Commit Convention.
• Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
• Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. fixes vitejs/vite#123).
• Ideally, include relevant tests that fail without this PR but pass with it.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for vite-docs-main canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	ee4e29b
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/vite-docs-main/deploys/62b59778b60c1a00094904bf

[sapphi-red]

I think this is a breaking change as the behavior is documented that include/exclude could be used to filter hmr enabled files.
https://github.com/vitejs/vite/tree/main/packages/plugin-react#filter-which-files-use-fast-refresh

I'm not much familiar with react, but I suppose adding a different property like includeTransform is better.

[bluwy]

I think this PR's way of using include/exclude make sense, and is usually how Rollup plugins work. Perhaps we can take the beta opportunity to make a breaking change. And for adjusting include/exclude for fast refresh, we can overload the fastRefresh option as { include, exclude } | boolean

[patak-dev]

Sounds good to me. @aleclarson ping so you're aware too. Let us know if you have an issue with the change.

[sapphi-red]

Maybe this one is doing slightly similar? #6202

[aleclarson]

Yeah I think #6202 is a better approach. Someone should write tests for it 😁

[ZYSzys]

Yeah I think #6202 is a better approach. Someone should write tests for it 😁

@aleclarson Yeah, I'm willing to write some tests for #6202, but I found there are some conflicts need to be resolved, could you make a git rebase from main branch first ?

[aleclarson]

@ZYSzys I will rebase it sometime in the next few days, thanks!

[patak-dev]

Closing this PR as #6202 seems like a better solution for the folks involved. @ZYSzys if you are going to add tests, you could fork @aleclarson PR, rebase, and push it yourself to the new plugin-react repository.