Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-16.0] VReplication: Ensure ROW events are sent within a transaction (#13547) #13580

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2023

Conversation

vitess-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot commented Jul 20, 2023

Description

This is a backport of #13547

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added Backport This is a backport Component: VReplication Merge Conflict Skip CI Skip CI actions from running Type: Bug labels Jul 20, 2023
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

vitess-bot bot commented Jul 20, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • If this is a change that users need to know about, please apply the release notes (needs details) label so that merging is blocked unless the summary release notes document is included.
  • If a test is added or modified, there should be a documentation on top of the test to explain what the expected behavior is what the test does.

If a new flag is being introduced:

  • Is it really necessary to add this flag?
  • Flag names should be clear and intuitive (as far as possible)
  • Help text should be descriptive.
  • Flag names should use dashes (-) as word separators rather than underscores (_).

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow should be required, the maintainer team should be notified.

Bug fixes

  • There should be at least one unit or end-to-end test.
  • The Pull Request description should include a link to an issue that describes the bug.

Non-trivial changes

  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.

New/Existing features

  • Should be documented, either by modifying the existing documentation or creating new documentation.
  • New features should have a link to a feature request issue or an RFC that documents the use cases, corner cases and test cases.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from VTop, if used there.

@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

vitess-bot bot commented Jul 20, 2023

Hello @mattlord, there are conflicts in this backport.

Please address them in order to merge this Pull Request. You can execute the snippet below to reset your branch and resolve the conflict manually.

Make sure you replace origin by the name of the vitessio/vitess remote

git fetch --all
gh pr checkout 13580 -R vitessio/vitess
git reset --hard origin/release-16.0
git cherry-pick -m 1 daedc549f85101f0e8739114336157cfd16cf98d

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Jul 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v16.0.3 milestone Jul 20, 2023
@mattlord mattlord removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says Skip CI Skip CI actions from running NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request Merge Conflict labels Jul 21, 2023
@mattlord mattlord force-pushed the backport-13547-to-release-16.0 branch from c70970c to f29794d Compare July 21, 2023 13:39
@mattlord mattlord marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2023 13:39
@mattlord mattlord force-pushed the backport-13547-to-release-16.0 branch from f29794d to 74ca2d5 Compare July 21, 2023 13:43
@mattlord mattlord force-pushed the backport-13547-to-release-16.0 branch from 74ca2d5 to 9df4a26 Compare July 21, 2023 13:53
Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <mattalord@gmail.com>
@mattlord mattlord force-pushed the backport-13547-to-release-16.0 branch from 9df4a26 to bea9758 Compare July 21, 2023 15:13
@mattlord mattlord merged commit 373d243 into release-16.0 Jul 21, 2023
221 checks passed
@mattlord mattlord deleted the backport-13547-to-release-16.0 branch July 21, 2023 15:55
arthurschreiber pushed a commit to github/vitess-gh that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2023
…io#13547) (vitessio#13580)

Signed-off-by: Arthur Schreiber <arthurschreiber@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matt Lord <mattalord@gmail.com>
@hmaurer hmaurer mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants