Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

switch tie-breaker to site_id #393

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 30, 2023
Merged

switch tie-breaker to site_id #393

merged 8 commits into from
Oct 30, 2023

Conversation

tantaman
Copy link
Collaborator

@tantaman tantaman commented Oct 13, 2023

This is to allow us to preserve transactionality of mutations.

In conjunction with #386, this'll allow fields to be all set together or all reverted together.

E.g., a case where x & y coordinates are supposed to be updated together or not at all.

This is to allow us to preserve transactionality of mutations.

In conjunction with #386, this'll allow fields to be all set together or all reverted together.

Useful for cases where `x` & `y` coordinates are supposed to be updated together or not at all or some such thing.
@tantaman tantaman merged commit e62bdc3 into main Oct 30, 2023
9 checks passed
tantaman added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
tantaman added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant