-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pipeline Service should be able to handle params #81
Comments
As discussed during pre-IPM: for beta the scope of this issue should just feed into Tekton params. We should have an additional field called |
Can we be clear that this story introduces Inputs and Params or add an 'Inputs' story? |
I wrote a kuttl test here - |
|
[#81] Authored-by: Waciuma Wanjohi <lwanjohi@pivotal.io>
[#81] Authored-by: Waciuma Wanjohi <lwanjohi@pivotal.io>
Co-authored-by: Waciuma Wanjohi <lwanjohi@pivotal.io> Co-authored-by: Todd Ritchie <tritchie@vmware.com> [#81]
Co-authored-by: Waciuma Wanjohi <lwanjohi@pivotal.io> Co-authored-by: Todd Ritchie <tritchie@vmware.com> [#81]
Co-authored-by: Waciuma Wanjohi <lwanjohi@pivotal.io> Co-authored-by: Todd Ritchie <tritchie@vmware.com> [#81]
As an operator, I want to be able to write values into the pipeline which are picked up by the runTemplate.
AC
would result in an object
Notes:
The top level field should be called
Inputs
. This field should be a map[string]JSONobject.Out of scope
Default values
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: