Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add csiNode cache for plugin #2371

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2022
Merged

add csiNode cache for plugin #2371

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2022

Conversation

wpeng102
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: wpeng102 wpeng102@126.com

For internal CSI plugin, it requre scheduler cache maintains a csiNodes just like Nodes in cache.

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 22, 2022
CSINodeName: cs.CSINodeName,
DriverStatus: make(map[string]bool),
}
for k, v := range newcs.DriverStatus {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

newcs is a empty map. Did you want to loop cs.DriverStatus?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry for code mistake. it should be cs.DriverStatus

@Thor-wl Thor-wl requested review from hwdef, qiankunli, shinytang6 and william-wang and removed request for merryzhou and alcorj-mizar July 25, 2022 01:41
var ok bool
csiNode, ok = t.Obj.(*sv1.CSINode)
if !ok {
utilruntime.HandleError(fmt.Errorf("unable to convert object %T to *sv1.CSINode", obj))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what's the difference between klog and utilruntime.HandleError? if they are the same, we can use the unified format klog and do not have to introcue utiruntime package.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

address comments

@william-wang
Copy link
Member

@wpeng102 please merge multiple commits to one, thanks :)

Signed-off-by: wpeng102 <wpeng102@126.com>

Signed-off-by: wpeng102 <wpeng102@126.com>

Signed-off-by: wpeng102 <wpeng102@126.com>
Copy link
Member

@william-wang william-wang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 25, 2022
@volcano-sh-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: william-wang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 25, 2022
@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot merged commit 2ecf008 into volcano-sh:master Jul 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants