-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Numerical facts don't get filtered properly #612
Labels
Comments
gdubicki
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2021
and extend the width of the fact values column in the node view as the values are usually longer that the names. Thus this implements #83. Also fix getting nodes with non-string fact values (#612): Examples: * int (in this case the filtering did not occur at all and ALL results were returned), * list of dict (here the filtering was not done and ZERO results were returned), As showing fact values does not use the code that strips trailing 'u' anymore, this also fixes #567.
gdubicki
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2021
and extend the width of the fact values column in the node view as the values are usually longer that the names. Thus this implements #83. Also fix getting nodes with non-string fact values (#612): Examples: * int (in this case the filtering did not occur at all and ALL results were returned), * list of dict (here the filtering was not done and ZERO results were returned), As showing fact values does not use the code that strips trailing 'u' anymore, this also fixes #567.
Fixed in v3.3.0 released today. Please check it out @mike406 . :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I noticed an issue with trying to filter numeric facts. For example I need to track version upgrades for our 600 Windows 10 PCs so I use the /fact/windows_release_id fact. If I want to view version 1909 for example, I would put /fact/windows_release_id/1909. However when I do this, it shows me all Windows 10's regardless of version number. I instead have to use the search box and type in "1909" to get the filter I need.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: