Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove code commented out or not built #188

Closed
wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

MichaelRawson
Copy link
Contributor

@MichaelRawson MichaelRawson commented Nov 24, 2020

See #157. Some files are commented out (permanently) in the build system: this removes them. Bonus: remove some redundant includes.

EDIT: also remove things guarded by GNUMP as it doesn't compile.

@MichaelRawson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@quickbeam123 - the commit sequence is designed to be cherry-picked from if people want some of these. :-)

@selig
Copy link
Contributor

selig commented Nov 24, 2020

I think we should look through these in a little detail.

For example, the files in the CTFwSubsAndRes commit were removed with the plan to "definitely" put them back when we fix code trees.

@MichaelRawson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@selig - agreed, hence the file-per-commit. CTFw has been out since 2016 so I figured we don't miss it, but by all means let me know if I can reanimate something.

@MichaelRawson MichaelRawson force-pushed the michael-remove-unused-files branch 3 times, most recently from 46c03a8 to 77be0c7 Compare November 26, 2020 10:52
@MichaelRawson MichaelRawson changed the title remove files commented out in build system remove code commented out or not built Dec 1, 2020
@MichaelRawson
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think people prefer these removed one-by-one, and this needs rebasing anyway. Let's can it and do them individually.

@MichaelRawson MichaelRawson deleted the michael-remove-unused-files branch July 12, 2023 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants