-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
defineModel ignores TS types #9587
Comments
I think this is related to special handling for boolean props that we also have in other scenarios. When we define props with a type interface, we generate the prop runtime definition without a runtime type (because the component will provide TS types to devs): const modelValue = defineModel<string | number | null>()
// results in runtime prop def:
props: {
"modelValue": {},
}, But when the prop is of type Boolean, we need to know that during runtime for casting props values properly. const modelValue = defineModel<boolean>()
// results in runtime prop def:
props: {
"modelValue": { type: Boolean },
}, Problem is that we get the same result for a union type containing const modelValue = defineModel<string | number | null | boolean>()
// results in runtime prop def:
props: {
"modelValue": { type: Boolean },
}, It would need to be: const modelValue = defineModel<string | number | null | boolean>()
// results in runtime prop def:
props: {
"modelValue": { type: [Boolean, String, Number] },
}, |
I briefly reviewed the source code and it looks like it was intentionally done. In the product environment, supports Boolean and Function when options are passed in. core/packages/compiler-sfc/src/script/defineModel.ts Lines 123 to 128 in fc79029
|
@RicardoErii core/packages/compiler-sfc/src/script/defineProps.ts Lines 262 to 276 in fc79029
|
Any update on this issue ? I've created a reproduction link (library mode) : https://stackblitz.com/edit/vitejs-vite-zz3d8x?file=dist%2Fmy-lib.js&view=editor and I've noticed a weird case. When typing using TypeScript AND setting <script setup lang="ts">
const a = defineModel<boolean>('a');
const b = defineModel<string>('b');
const c = defineModel<string | boolean>('c');
const d = defineModel<string | boolean>('d', { type: [String, Boolean] });
const e = defineModel('e', {type: [String, Boolean]});
</script> // lib output
import { defineComponent as t, useModel as o } from 'vue';
const n = /* @__PURE__ */ t({
__name: 'SampleComponent',
props: {
a: { type: Boolean },
aModifiers: {},
b: {},
bModifiers: {},
c: { type: Boolean }, // <-- Should be {type: [String, Boolean] }
cModifiers: {},
d: { type: Boolean, type: [String, Boolean] }, // <-- type property is duplicated with different values
dModifiers: {},
e: { type: [String, Boolean] },
eModifiers: {},
},
emits: ['update:a', 'update:b', 'update:c', 'update:d', 'update:e'],
setup(e) {
return o(e, 'a'), o(e, 'b'), o(e, 'c'), o(e, 'd'), o(e, 'e'), () => {};
},
});
export { n as SampleComponent };
//# sourceMappingURL=my-lib.js.map A possible workaround could be to specify type property, but TypeScript complains about it in my editor : |
Any update on this? |
…n types (vuejs#9603) close vuejs#9587 close vuejs#10676
Vue version
3.3.8
Link to minimal reproduction
https://play.vuejs.org/#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
Steps to reproduce
Create a Component with a defineModel that got multiple types
Use the component.
Observe warning:
What is expected?
Expected is that the component accepts the string without any errors.
What is actually happening?
The component throws a warning that it got passed a String instead a Boolean
System Info
No response
Any additional comments?
Im now defineModel is an experimental feature , but i guess the user would expect that it works as the usual prop type definition that throws no warning.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: