-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 793
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: rm seq_unchecked usage in codebase #2485
fix: rm seq_unchecked usage in codebase #2485
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2485 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 84.54% 84.56% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 93 93
Lines 9237 9228 -9
Branches 2091 2086 -5
==========================================
- Hits 7809 7804 -5
+ Misses 939 937 -2
+ Partials 489 487 -2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Charles: A string can be a symbol _sym_xyz or straight variable reference like x, in either case is either a PUSH or a DUP. Co-authored-by: Charles Cooper <cooper.charles.m@gmail.com>
893766f
to
ebcba80
Compare
@@ -322,12 +322,6 @@ def _compile_to_assembly(code, withargs=None, existing_labels=None, break_dest=N | |||
o.append("POP") | |||
return o | |||
# Seq without popping. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
# Seq without popping. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM pending tests passing
What I did
With the guidance of @charles-cooper, removed seq_unchecked usage in various places in the codebase.
How I did it
mainly just
s/seq_unchecked/seq
How to verify it
Tests pass as usual
Description for the changelog
fix: remove
seq_unchecked
usage in LLLCute Animal Picture