-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
266 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,266 @@ | ||
| # Minutes of did-pkh work item | ||
|
|
||
| ## 24 Mar 2022 | ||
|
|
||
| Agenda: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/issues/28 | ||
|
|
||
| IRC: https://meet.w3c-ccg.org/archives/w3c-ccg-didpkh-2022-03-24-irc.log | ||
| Audio: https://meet.w3c-ccg.org/archives/w3c-ccg-didpkh-2022-03-24.ogg | ||
| Video: https://meet.w3c-ccg.org/archives/w3c-ccg-didpkh-2022-03-24.mp4 | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| did:pkh DID Method Task Force Transcript for 2022-03-23 | ||
| Organizer: | ||
| Wayne Chang | ||
| Scribe: | ||
| Our Robot Overlords | ||
| Present: | ||
| Zach (Ceramic), Sergey Ukustov, TallTed // Ted Thibodeau (he/him) | ||
| (OpenLinkSw.com), Charles E. Lehner, Brian Richter | ||
| Our Robot Overlords are scribing. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Recording is on. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: This is the did pkh call and recording is on. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: So I'm going to find the issue. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: That I. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And for this for this call. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And share this in the chat. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/issues/28 | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Does anyone have an agenda items. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Currently we there's two open PRs and a bunch | ||
| of issues. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And I wanted to mention the couplet cctc a | ||
| recovery script oh sweet is there anything else we should talk | ||
| about. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Okay I guess we could start. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: So the pull request there's two polar quests | ||
| the first one is number 23. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/pull/23 | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I'm meeting a few several weeks ago that was | ||
| not really a. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Full meeting but one person. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Attended as well as me and we talked. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Is this something that where we'd be okay | ||
| with emerging as a as a transcript of a previous call or is | ||
| nobody comfortable with that today. | ||
| Brian Richter: Seems fine to me I hear them. | ||
| <tallted_//_ted_thibodeau_(he/him)_(openlinksw.com)> no objection | ||
| here | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: All right I'll put a note. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: There are no objections. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I also realized we should probably have | ||
| introductions I recognize some people here did but does anybody | ||
| want to introduce themselves. | ||
| Brian Richter: Yeah sure yeah I'm Brian Richter company Aviary | ||
| Tech who's been hovering around the space for a while now and I | ||
| had been meaning to join these calls but didn't see it on my | ||
| calendar and can find it for a while but then I saw you and Juan | ||
| talking about it and there wasn't many people joining so I found | ||
| it in here. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Cool thanks Brian welcome did the auto scribe | ||
| describe your company's name correctly. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Or how is it spelled. | ||
| Zach_(Ceramic): And I can go as well yeah I'm Zach I'm with the | ||
| three-box Labs team working on ceramic and work on the client | ||
| libraries and some of the education stuff Join one of these is a | ||
| few weeks ago or maybe a few months now not too familiar the | ||
| process here but yeah we'll try to be here more often. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Cool thanks Zack welcome. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And I'm Charles Laney from Spruce sorry go | ||
| ahead. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And all Ted is everyone no tell Ted Ted you | ||
| want to introduce yourself. | ||
| TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): Sure I can do | ||
| that I'm Ted Thibodeau, with OpenLink Software have been for 20 | ||
| plus years. | ||
| TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): I'm involved | ||
| with a whole bunch of identity related working groups and | ||
| Community groups on W3 and this is just one of them not high on | ||
| the crypto but many of the other pieces. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Call thanks Daddy. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And I'm Charles I work at Spruce and I'm in | ||
| the did working group The VC working group credentials community | ||
| group and implementing software at Spruce and working on this | ||
| work item at ccg. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: So I guess we could proceed with PRS and | ||
| issues unless anybody has any any other ideas. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Okay so that was PR number 23 the next one | ||
| open is number 15. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/pull/15 | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: In no particular order this is ADD support | ||
| for a Leo. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And I think this is still waiting on iron | ||
| iron the The Capes process to approve this alien namespace. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Is there anything else to mention about this. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Okay I put. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Know in the comments about that. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: So next we can we have issues and. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And we have this additional agenda item that | ||
| I added there's nine issues. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c/vc-wg-charter/pull/105 | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I guess I'll just mention this this VC | ||
| working group Charter PR 105 that's was something I wanted to | ||
| share with this work item call because it's relevant for you did | ||
| pkh. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: It's a signature sweet for Recovery ecdsa | ||
| recovery signature for a sec P 256 K 1 and this is useful for did | ||
| pkh we use it we specify to use it in the in the did pkh spec and | ||
| it's because you can create a signature. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Then recover the public key and then hash the | ||
| public key to verify that it corresponds to a blockchain account | ||
| ID. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: To beat that the pkh did is using. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Does that make sense for our just anyone have | ||
| any questions about that. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I don't hear any questions or comments. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: All right so that's that I guess then there's | ||
| issues. | ||
| Brian Richter: I guess I guess I do have a comment so I voiced | ||
| my Swan on the issue I'm just wondering with the if there's | ||
| anything else we could do to make sure it gets into the charter | ||
| or anything else we can help with anything. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Oh I don't know but I thank you Brian for | ||
| that comment. | ||
| Brian Richter: Certain important work thanks for getting the | ||
| yarn. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Hopefully it will be okay with the working | ||
| group. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: So then as for the issues there's nine open | ||
| does anybody have any particular issue they'd want to discuss | ||
| first. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: If not we can just go in the order that | ||
| they're listed. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Prioritize by labels and then stay list | ||
| first. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: There's 13 minutes left for this scheduled | ||
| call do we feel this is a good use of the time or would we rather | ||
| have a different format or prefer to do this with. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: The other the other work item people. | ||
| Zach_(Ceramic): Yeah I don't I don't have much contact some of | ||
| these I guess last time I was pinned on one issue that I never | ||
| followed up on so the phone is contact some I guess number 12 I'd | ||
| be interested or in general how to navigate this the otherwise I | ||
| will contact some other issues. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Anyone else have any other thoughts. | ||
| Brian Richter: Let's start with that one see. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/issues/12 | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Okay sounds good so there's issue number 12 | ||
| playing Json text Vac test vectors still needed as noted in | ||
| number seven which is the pr that added test Vector did documents | ||
| which were later updated so I guess the idea is that these are | ||
| json-ld test vectors. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And LD documents and their this issue is | ||
| called for Json did documents. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I've had trouble seeing a consensus among the | ||
| did working group about if the Json did document is supposed to | ||
| be the same as a json-ld dig document as far as Json or if it's | ||
| supposed to just have the @context omitted. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Does anybody have ideas about that. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: It could be something that as a did method we | ||
| could take a stance on. | ||
| Brian Richter: I think personally I think committing the context | ||
| doesn't really add anything and it only subtract. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: So if it's if it's only the same if it's only | ||
| the same exact object then maybe it's not necessary or maybe the | ||
| suspect could be updated to say that that they can be used either | ||
| way. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Are there any other ideas about this. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Jack do you think that it would be good to | ||
| have a different set of test factors that are playing Json or do | ||
| you think these could be use used as as Json even though they're | ||
| originally json-ld. | ||
| Zach_(Ceramic): Yeah I don't have enough context to say but this | ||
| is mostly asking about this issue still relevant led to comment | ||
| on it and if there's any one thing yet figure out of context on | ||
| it. | ||
| Zach_(Ceramic): Not at the moment. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Is there anything we could say in the issue | ||
| thread that would be relevant. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Okay I'll tell you that weird if it seems | ||
| when we don't have a decision about this or enough context today | ||
| to make any decision about it. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I'm writing a comment. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Also we do have the CG but here so if anyone | ||
| wants to Q Plus is so small call but that could be useful. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Okay I wrote a comment. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Shall we going to more issues. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Well I guess that's what we could do. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Next shoe is number 27 update registration | ||
| and did spec registries. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Just something that we're going to go honors. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I have opinions about it. | ||
| Brian Richter: I have a sort of unrelated question is there a | ||
| rendered version of the spec or is it just the markdown in the | ||
| GitHub. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: It's just the markdown currently which is | ||
| rendered as that that file that there's no other web page | ||
| currently do we feel like this is sufficient or not. | ||
| Brian Richter: I think it's probably fine but I don't really | ||
| have any strong opinions. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I'm going back to the issues list. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Stillest first order. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-pkh/issues/18 | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: We have numbers 18 Upstream wishlist item. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Public or objective verification method | ||
| specification. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I think we might need one on this call to | ||
| address this. | ||
| TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): Looks like | ||
| adding a help wanted tag to this could also be good. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I guess as far as the verification method | ||
| used in did pkh the blockchain method is being suggested in this | ||
| issue blockchain 2021 under or he's account. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And this is also in the VC working group | ||
| Charter as one of the possible input documents so or no it's not | ||
| I'm sorry the pgp crypto Sweta is but the blockchain one is not | ||
| so. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Something relevant in the future. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: But we can't do much with the right now I | ||
| think. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Well unless anyone has anything else about | ||
| that I think maybe it'd be good if we can talk about the | ||
| scheduling of this call. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Because one said that this time is not | ||
| working for dif. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: And He suggests Tuesday or Wednesday but we | ||
| also have to check with Joel about that is anyone on this call | ||
| currently have requests or priorities for scheduling of this call | ||
| and the future. | ||
| Brian Richter: It would work I'm sorry well for me on Wednesdays | ||
| or Tuesdays. | ||
| Brian Richter: Yeah Wednesday might be better. | ||
| TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): Tuesday's | ||
| pretty full for people involved in CG and did work it may be | ||
| worth starting to Doodle Poll for this. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: What about after VC working group. | ||
| TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): On which day. | ||
| TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): It looks like | ||
| that could work at least for me I can't speak for others. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I have a conflict with. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: With that if so if it's too complicated we | ||
| could we could try to do polling. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: This would be a 12 or maybe 12 15 on | ||
| Wednesday Eastern Time. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Okay well that's it for this half hour. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Thanks everybody for for joining. | ||
| TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): Charles all | ||
| suggest that you throw a message out to I don't know what the | ||
| appropriate list is for this But whichever listed is suggesting | ||
| the possibility of the Wednesday time and see what happens. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Okay good idea thanks Ted. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: I'm any recording now. | ||
| Brian Richter: Maybe even the ccg mailing list for that. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Recording his sorry what's that. | ||
| TallTed_//_Ted_Thibodeau_(he/him)_(OpenLinkSw.com): All right I'm | ||
| just saying next time. | ||
| Brian Richter: Maybe even the ccg mailing list for that and then | ||
| you might get more interest joining as well. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Yep I thought that's what Ted suggested was | ||
| he saying the VC working group mailing list. | ||
| Brian Richter: No no he just didn't clarify what that's for | ||
| that. | ||
| Charles E. Lehner: Okay well that sounds good okay thanks have a | ||
| good one. | ||
| <zach_(ceramic)> thanks! | ||
| ``` |