HTMLLinkElement extension is redundant

[saschanaz]

All members on the following extension is already defined in HTML:

partial interface HTMLLinkElement {
  [CEReactions] attribute USVString scope;
  [CEReactions] attribute WorkerType workerType;
  [CEReactions] attribute boolean useCache;
};

[HTMLConstructor]
interface HTMLLinkElement : HTMLElement {
  [CEReactions] attribute USVString href;
  [CEReactions] attribute DOMString? crossOrigin;
  [CEReactions] attribute DOMString rel;
  [CEReactions] attribute RequestDestination as; // (default "")
  [SameObject, PutForwards=value] readonly attribute DOMTokenList relList;
  [CEReactions] attribute DOMString media;
  [CEReactions] attribute DOMString nonce;
  [CEReactions] attribute DOMString integrity;
  [CEReactions] attribute DOMString hreflang;
  [CEReactions] attribute DOMString type;
  [SameObject, PutForwards=value] readonly attribute DOMTokenList sizes;
  [CEReactions] attribute DOMString referrerPolicy;
  [CEReactions] attribute USVString scope;
  [CEReactions] attribute WorkerType workerType;
  [CEReactions] attribute boolean useCache;
};
HTMLLinkElement implements LinkStyle;

Is there any reason to keep this extension?

[mkruisselbrink]

No reason. This should be cleaned up on the service worker side now they are defined in HTML. I just haven't gotten around to doing so yet.

[mkruisselbrink]

And this actually is a duplicate of #1073