Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CHIPS IETF draft #823

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2023
Merged

Add CHIPS IETF draft #823

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2023

Conversation

tidoust
Copy link
Member

@tidoust tidoust commented Jan 9, 2023

As requested in #822.

I'm not entirely clear whether the IETF work supersedes the WICG work and repo. I kept the WICG/CHIPS entry in the monitor list for now.

Change:

{
  "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies",
  "seriesComposition": "full",
  "shortname": "partitioned-cookies",
  "series": {
    "shortname": "partitioned-cookies",
    "currentSpecification": "partitioned-cookies",
    "title": "Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State specification",
    "shortTitle": "Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State specification",
    "nightlyUrl": "https://dcthetall.github.io/CHIPS-spec/draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies.html"
  },
  "organization": "IETF",
  "groups": [
    {
      "name": "HTTP Working Group",
      "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/"
    }
  ],
  "nightly": {
    "url": "https://dcthetall.github.io/CHIPS-spec/draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies.html",
    "status": "Editor's Draft",
    "repository": "https://github.com/DCtheTall/CHIPS-spec",
    "alternateUrls": [],
    "sourcePath": "draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies.md",
    "filename": "draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies.html"
  },
  "title": "Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State specification",
  "source": "spec",
  "shortTitle": "Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State specification",
  "categories": [
    "browser"
  ],
  "standing": "good"
}

As requested in #822.

I'm not entirely clear whether the IETF work supersedes the WICG work and repo.
I kept the `WICG/CHIPS` entry in the monitor list for now.

Change:

```json
{
  "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies",
  "seriesComposition": "full",
  "shortname": "partitioned-cookies",
  "series": {
    "shortname": "partitioned-cookies",
    "currentSpecification": "partitioned-cookies",
    "title": "Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State specification",
    "shortTitle": "Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State specification",
    "nightlyUrl": "https://dcthetall.github.io/CHIPS-spec/draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies.html"
  },
  "organization": "IETF",
  "groups": [
    {
      "name": "HTTP Working Group",
      "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/"
    }
  ],
  "nightly": {
    "url": "https://dcthetall.github.io/CHIPS-spec/draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies.html",
    "status": "Editor's Draft",
    "repository": "https://github.com/DCtheTall/CHIPS-spec",
    "alternateUrls": [],
    "sourcePath": "draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies.md",
    "filename": "draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies.html"
  },
  "title": "Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State specification",
  "source": "spec",
  "shortTitle": "Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State specification",
  "categories": [
    "browser"
  ],
  "standing": "good"
}
```
@tidoust tidoust requested a review from dontcallmedom January 9, 2023 12:53
@tidoust tidoust merged commit 513c2b6 into main Jan 9, 2023
@tidoust tidoust deleted the CHIPS branch January 9, 2023 13:12
@chrisdavidmills
Copy link

Thanks @tidoust !

@tidoust
Copy link
Member Author

tidoust commented Jan 9, 2023

You're welcome, @chrisdavidmills, but note the update has not been released yet ;)
I will issue a new release once the pending PR is merged.

@chrisdavidmills
Copy link

chrisdavidmills commented Jan 9, 2023

Yup, it's all good. I was going to wait a while until MDN has slurped up the new data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants