dpv:Concept definition is missing in spec and serialisations #51
Assignees
Comments
|
Hi. Thanks for noticing and pointing this out. I will fix this in the next minor update, probably will be published tomorrow eve along with other fixes. |
coolharsh55
changed the title
|
@bertvannuffelen I've added HTML description for Concept in 4027fbd - you can see it live at https://harshp.com/dpv-x/dpv/#Concept Let me know if there is anything more to do here. |
coolharsh55
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2022
NOTE: While this is a regular 0.x style release, it also acts as the v1.0 release candidate. This means if there are no major issues raised and unable to be resolved, including missing parts, errors or bugs, or requirements that must be added, then after 15-OCT-2022, this version will be re-released as DPV v1.0 along with any further enhancements, fixes, minor additions, or documentations that have been developed until then. This release includes: - Change concepts to use subtype instead of instance for Duration, Frequency, Organisation, Data Subjects, and Location. - Change Anonymisation related terms in Technical Measures to disambiguate anonymisation and pseudonymisation, and create a cleaner hierarchy of anonymisation related terms. - Update and fix existing terms and labels for clarity of concepts. - Fixes #54 re. purpose label - Fixes #52 re. describing properties with no domain/range - Fixes #51 re. definition of Concept For more details, see the changelog at https://w3id.org/dpv/dpv/changelog
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
in many properties this is mentioned but not defined/nor resolveable.
kr,
Bert
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: