Not check errata link for REC with Candidate/Proposed changes

lib/rules.json

@@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@
                                 " <p>If this is a modified Recommendation that was modified in place or is a new edition, the document <span class=\"rfc2119\">must</span> include both the original publication date and the modification date. For example:</p> <pre xml:space=\"preserve\">&lt;p id=\"w3c-state\"&gt;<a href=\"https://www.w3.org/standards/types#REC\">W3C Recommendation</a> 7 April 2004, edited in place 19 August2004&lt;/p&gt;</pre>"
                             ],
                             "docIDFormat": true,
-                            "docIDOrder": "Document identifier information <span class=\"rfc2119\">must</span> be present in this order: <ul><li>'This version' - URI to that version</li><li>'Latest version' - URI to the latest version. See also the (non-normative) <cite> <a href=\"https://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions\">Version Management in W3C Technical Reports</a> </cite> for information about \"latest version\" URI and version management.</li><li class=\"historyuri\">'History' - URI to the history of the specification</li><li>Editor(s)</li><li>Feedback - GitHub repository issue links are required in the &lt;dl&gt;after &lt;dt&gt;Feedback:&lt;/dt&gt; in the headers (&lt;div class=\"head\"&gt;) of the document. Links are expected to be of the form <code>https://github.com/&lt;USER_OR_ORG&gt;/&lt;REPO_NAME&gt;/[issues|labels][/&hellip;]</code>.)</li><li>Errata - URI to an errata document for any errors or issues reported since publication. See also suggestions on <a href=\"https://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#Errata\">errata page structure</a> in the Manual of Style. <strong>Note:</strong> Do not put the errata document in TR space as the expectation is that we will not modify document in TR space after publication; see the policy for <a href=\"https://www.w3.org/2003/01/republishing/\">in-place modification of W3C Technical Reports</a>.</li></ul>",
+                            "docIDOrder": "Document identifier information <span class=\"rfc2119\">must</span> be present in this order: <ul><li>'This version' - URI to that version</li><li>'Latest version' - URI to the latest version. See also the (non-normative) <cite> <a href=\"https://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions\">Version Management in W3C Technical Reports</a> </cite> for information about \"latest version\" URI and version management.</li><li class=\"historyuri\">'History' - URI to the history of the specification</li><li>Editor(s)</li><li>Feedback - GitHub repository issue links are required in the &lt;dl&gt;after &lt;dt&gt;Feedback:&lt;/dt&gt; in the headers (&lt;div class=\"head\"&gt;) of the document. Links are expected to be of the form <code>https://github.com/&lt;USER_OR_ORG&gt;/&lt;REPO_NAME&gt;/[issues|labels][/&hellip;]</code>.)</li><li>Errata - URI to an errata document for any errors or issues reported since publication. See also suggestions on <a href=\"https://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#Errata\">errata page structure</a> in the Manual of Style. <strong>Note:</strong><ul><li> Do not put the errata document in TR space as the expectation is that we will not modify document in TR space after publication; see the policy for <a href=\"https://www.w3.org/2003/01/republishing/\">in-place modification of W3C Technical Reports</a>.</li><li>Recommendations with candidate/proposed changes are treated as inline errata, and these documents don't require an errata link.</li></ul></li></ul>",
                             "docIDThisVersion": ["REC"],
                             "docIDDate": true,
                             "docIDLatestVersion": true,

lib/rules/headers/errata.js

@@ -2,15 +2,32 @@
 
 const self = {
     name: 'headers.errata',
+    section: 'front-matter',
+    rule: 'docIDOrder',
 };
 
 export const { name } = self;
 
+// Check if document is Recommendation, and uses inline changes(REC with Candidate/Proposed changes)
+function isRECWithChanges(sr) {
+    if (sr.config.status !== 'REC') {
+        return false;
+    }
+
+    const recMeta = sr.getRecMetadata({});
+    return Object.values(recMeta).length !== 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * @param sr
  * @param done
  */
 export function check(sr, done) {
+    // for REC with Candidate/Proposed changes, no need to check errata link
+    if (isRECWithChanges(sr)) {
+        return done();
+    }
+
     const dts = sr.extractHeaders();
     // Check 'Errata:' exist, don't check any further.
     if (!dts.Errata) {

test/data/TR/Recommendation/REC.js

@@ -54,6 +54,22 @@ export const rules = {
                 data: 'noErrata',
                 errors: ['headers.errata.no-errata'],
             },
+            {
+                data: 'recWithProposedSubChanges',
+                errors: [],
+            },
+            {
+                data: 'recWithProposedNewChanges',
+                errors: [],
+            },
+            {
+                data: 'recWithCandidateSubChanges',
+                errors: [],
+            },
+            {
+                data: 'recWithCandidateNewChanges',
+                errors: [],
+            },
         ],
         dl: [
             ...baseRules.headers.dl,

test/doc-views/TR/Recommendation/REC.js

@@ -34,6 +34,66 @@ export default {
                 needErrata: false,
             },
         },
+        recWithProposedSubChanges: {
+            ...good,
+            config: {
+                ...good.config,
+                needErrata: false,
+            },
+            sotd: {
+                ...good.sotd,
+                rec: {
+                    ...good.sotd.rec,
+                    showAddition: true,
+                    addition: 'It includes proposed corrections.',
+                },
+            },
+        },
+        recWithProposedNewChanges: {
+            ...good,
+            config: {
+                ...good.config,
+                needErrata: false,
+            },
+            sotd: {
+                ...good.sotd,
+                rec: {
+                    ...good.sotd.rec,
+                    showProposedAdd: true,
+                },
+            },
+        },
+        recWithCandidateSubChanges: {
+            ...good,
+            config: {
+                ...good.config,
+                needErrata: false,
+            },
+            sotd: {
+                ...good.sotd,
+                rec: {
+                    ...good.sotd.rec,
+                    showAddition: true,
+                    addition: 'It includes candidate corrections.',
+                },
+            },
+        },
+        recWithCandidateNewChanges: {
+            ...good,
+            config: {
+                ...good.config,
+                needErrata: false,
+            },
+            sotd: {
+                ...good.sotd,
+                rec: {
+                    ...good.sotd.rec,
+                    showAddition: true,
+                    addition:
+                        'It includes candidate additions, introducing new features since the previous Recommendation.',
+                },
+            },
+        },
     },
     deployment: {
         noDeployment: {