You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have an in-progress Internet-Draft (I-D) that creates two distinct, but related, IANA registries, one for "WebAuthn Attestation Formats" and one for "WebAuthn Extension Identifiers".
We can and should at this time add appropriate placeholder references to the WebAuthn spec draft referencing these to-be-created registries, and noting the existence of draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-00 -- this will hopefully mitigate misunderstandings among us regarding whether we are creating registries or not.
A related but different issue is whether or not to have the actual specification of the presently-known attestation formats within the webauthn spec or in a separate specification. See #108
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
updating issue title to reflect the change terminology from 'attestation type' to 'attestation format'
equalsJeffH
changed the title
add references to IANA WebAuthn Attestation Types and Extension Identifiers Registries
add references to IANA WebAuthn Attestation Formats and Extension Identifiers Registries
Sep 1, 2016
We have an in-progress Internet-Draft (I-D) that creates two distinct, but related, IANA registries, one for "WebAuthn Attestation Formats" and one for "WebAuthn Extension Identifiers".
the initial draft of this I-D is here..
..and a subsequent message clarifying its purpose and applicability to the webauthn spec is here..
..as well as this message clarifying the relationship between registries and specifications..
We can and should at this time add appropriate placeholder references to the WebAuthn spec draft referencing these to-be-created registries, and noting the existence of draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-00 -- this will hopefully mitigate misunderstandings among us regarding whether we are creating registries or not.
A related but different issue is whether or not to have the actual specification of the presently-known attestation formats within the webauthn spec or in a separate specification. See #108
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: