Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix reference for element disabled #1769

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2023
Merged

Conversation

whimboo
Copy link
Contributor

@whimboo whimboo commented Nov 14, 2023

To properly check an element for disabled we have to reference the actually disabled section of the HTML spec.

It means the link changes from https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-fe-disabled to https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-element-disabled.

@jgraham can you please review?


Preview | Diff

@whimboo whimboo requested a review from jgraham November 14, 2023 17:26
Copy link
Member

@jgraham jgraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although I think maybe we should consider updating the text to use "actually disabled".

@whimboo
Copy link
Contributor Author

whimboo commented Nov 20, 2023

@sadym-chromium, @gsnedders, @AutomatedTester, @shs96c could you please review this change? While browsers may still use the Is Element Enabled atom this brings us closer to a world without the Is Element enabled atom from Selenium.

Thanks.

@whimboo
Copy link
Contributor Author

whimboo commented Dec 12, 2023

@sadym-chromium, @gsnedders, @AutomatedTester, @shs96c could you please review this change? While browsers may still use the Is Element Enabled atom this brings us closer to a world without the Is Element enabled atom from Selenium.

I would appreciate feedback for this change from those listed above. Are you ok with this change or do you have objections? Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@shs96c shs96c left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Thank you!

@whimboo
Copy link
Contributor Author

whimboo commented Dec 15, 2023

Thank you all for the reviews. I think that we basically have enough reviews from different stake holders that we can get the PR merged.

@whimboo whimboo merged commit 2e6ca25 into w3c:master Dec 15, 2023
2 checks passed
@whimboo whimboo deleted the element-disabled branch December 15, 2023 12:04
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2023
SHA: 2e6ca25
Reason: push, by whimboo

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit to soloinovator/webdriver that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2023
SHA: 2e6ca25
Reason: push, by pull[bot]

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit to xjc90s/webdriver that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2023
SHA: 2e6ca25
Reason: push, by pull[bot]

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants